 |
Intel Core i7-13800H vs Intel Core i7-10870H |
|
Processor comparisons 02-02-2023
Let's say you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a choice after reading the detailed tests Intel Core i7-13800H vs Intel Core i7-10870H and see which is better for games or normal use for programming, machine learning, rendering, video editing, streaming. Here is useful information from several benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A careful review of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests like AIDA64, PCMark 10, WPrime, Gears 5, MATLAB, 7zip, Blender, RealBench, Dolphin Emulator, Prime95, SuperPi, VeraCrypt, Blender, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Furmark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, UserBenchmark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), GeekBench 6, 5.2, Handbrake, PassMark, 3DMark.
Gaming performance of CPUs in: - World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Overwatch
- Fortnite
- Fallout 76
- Valorant
- Halo Infinite
- Borderlands 3
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Valheim
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Apex Legends
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Death Stranding
- DOOM: Eternal
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Last Man Standing
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i7-10870H or Intel Core i7-13800H.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i7-13800H | 59% |
Core i7-10870H | 54% |
This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i7-13800H is 8% better than Core i7-10870H. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i7-13800H | 58% |
Core i7-10870H | 54% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of other games in which processors were compared: Horizon Zero Dawn, Metro Exodus, DOTA 2A, Forza Horizon 4, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), NBA 2K20, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Battlefield V, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Monster Hunter World, Hitman 3, League of Legends (LOL), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Ghostrunner, Control, Half-Life: Alyx, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO).
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 102.2 | 96.0 | | Valorant | 116.2 | 109.1 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 65.1 | 61.1 | | Apex Legends | 109.2 | 102.5 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 87.1 | 81.8 | | Overwatch | 94.1 | 88.3 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 80.2 | 75.3 | | DOOM Eternal | 58.1 | 54.5 | | Warzone | 90.6 | 85.1 | | Assassin's Creed | 97.6 | 91.6 | | Valheim | 96.4 | 90.5 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i7-13800H | 140% |
Core i7-10870H | 94% |
To make a final resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i7-13800H is more energy efficient than the Core i7-10870H since it has less power consumption: 45W vs. 45W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, streaming, programming, video rendering or video editing, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU includes all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to reach maximum performance. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i7-13800H |
Intel Core i7-10870H | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 295 | 208 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2867 | 1522 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 476 | 499 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 6345 | 3457 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1623 | 1167 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 18210 | 11396 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-13800H |
Intel Core i7-10870H | | Single-Core | 1486 | 2734 | | Multi-Core | 31020 | 15954 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-13800H |
Intel Core i7-10870H | | Single-Core | 1903 | 1271 | | Multi-Core | 13966 | 7816 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in new games. It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Core i7-13800H |
Intel Core i7-10870H | | Announcement date | January 28, 2023 | October 01, 2020 | | Type | Laptop | Laptop | | Socket | FCBGA1744 | FCBGA1440 | | Core name | Raptor Lake | Comet Lake | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 13 | 10 | | Turbo Frequency | 5.2 MHz | 5 MHz | | Frequency | 4 MHz | 2.2 MHz | | Cores | 14 | 8 | | Threads | 20 | 16 | | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm | | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 6800 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 45 W | 45 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5200 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5/x 6400 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | DDR4-2933 | | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 128 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 6500 | | | Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 45.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | 2 MB | | | L2 cache | 8 MB | | | L3 cache | 24 MB | 16 MB | | Overclocking | No | Yes | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | Expansion Options
| |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i7-13800H is 44% better than Core i7-10870H in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i7-13800H has 6 more core than Core i7-10870H. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-13800H is better: 32
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-10870H is better: 5
However, it should be understood that all the data that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Core i7-13800H and Intel Core i7-10870H before deciding which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i7-13800H Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i9-13900HX
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Core i7-13700HX
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Core i9-13980HX
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Core i5-13450HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Core i5-13500HX
• Vs Core i7-12800H
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Core i9-12900HX
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX
• Vs Core i9-12900HK
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
• Vs Core i7-1365U
• Vs Core i9-11980HK
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS
• Vs Core i7-12850HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
• Vs Core i7-1370P
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H
• Vs Core i9-11950H
• Vs Core i7-12650HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900H
• Vs Core i3-1305U
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
• Vs Core i7-12650H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
• Vs Core i7-1360P
• Vs Core i5-13505H
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Core i5-12600H
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS
• Vs Core i9-12950HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Core i5-12600HX
• Vs Core i7-1280P
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Core i5-1155G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Core i5-1350P
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600U
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Core i5-11500H
• Vs Core i3-1115G4
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Ryzen 3 3250U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
• Vs Core i5-1250P
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Core i7-1355U
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U
• Vs Core i9-9980HK
• Vs Core i5-1340P
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500U
• Vs Core i9-10885H
• Vs Core i5-1135G7
• Vs Core i7-1165G7
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800U
• Vs Core i7-1270P
• Vs Core i7-1065G7
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition
• Vs Core i7-11390H
• Vs Ryzen 3 5400U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300U
• Vs Core i7-1255U
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Core i5-1230U
• Vs Core i5-1334U
• Vs Core i5-12450HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600U
• Vs Core i5-1245U
• Vs Core i9-10980HK
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
• Vs Ryzen 5 3580U
• Vs Core i3-1220P
• Vs Core i5-1235U
• Vs Core i7-1260U
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U
• Vs Core i5-1240P
• Vs Core i5-1240U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625U
• Vs Core i7-1250U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Core i5-1345U
• Vs Core i7-1265U
• Vs Core i7-13850HX
• Vs Core i9-13900H
• Vs Core i9-13905H
• Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7530U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
Intel Core i7-10870H Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE
• Vs Core i7-10700F
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Core i7-10700
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Core i7-10700K
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
• Vs Core i5-11600K
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Core i9-10850K
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Core i9-10900K
• Vs Core i9-9920X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Core i5-10600K
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Core i7-9700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Core i5-10600
• Vs Core i7-8700K
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
• Vs Core i7-9700
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500X
• Vs Core i5-10500
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600
• Vs Core i7-10700T
• Vs Core i7-8700
• Vs Ryzen 3 3300X
• Vs Core i7-9700E
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Core i5-10400F
• Vs Core i5-10400
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 3100
• Vs Core i5-1145G7
• Vs Core i7-1160G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Core i7-9750H
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600U
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs Core i5-10600T
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Core i7-11700T
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
• Vs Core i5-11600KF
• Vs Core i5-11600
• Vs Core i5-11600T
• Vs Core i5-11500
• Vs Core i5-11500T
• Vs Core i5-11400
• Vs Core i5-11400F
• Vs Core i5-11400T
• Vs Core i5-11300H
• Vs Core i7-11375H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600E
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600U
• Vs Core i7-10700KF
• Vs Core i9-7900X
• Vs Core i9-10900F
• Vs Core i9-10900
• Vs Core i9-9820X
• Vs Core i9-9900KS
• Vs Core i7-7900X
• Vs Core i9-10900T
• Vs Core i9-9900KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600
• Vs Core i7-9800X
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900H
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition
• Vs Core i7-7820X
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800U
• Vs Core i7-6950X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
• Vs Core i9-9900
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
• Vs Core i9-10980HK
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
• Vs Core i9-10885H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G
• Vs Core i9-10880H
• Vs Ryzen 7 1800X
• Vs Core i5-10600KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
• Vs Core i7-9700KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
• Vs Core i7-8086K
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
• Vs Core i9-9900T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700E
• Vs Core i7-6900K
• Vs Core i7-9700F
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700X
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
• Vs Core i9-10900TE
• Vs Core i9-10900E
• Vs Core i5-11320H
• Vs Core i5-11260H
• Vs Xeon W-11855M
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Pentium 8500
• Vs Core i3-1210U
• Vs Pentium 8505
• Vs Core i5-1230U
• Vs Core i5-1240U
• Vs Core i7-1250U
• Vs Core i3-1215U
• Vs Core i5-1235U
• Vs Core i5-1245U
• Vs Core i7-1255U
• Vs Core i7-1260U
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625U
• Vs Core i9-9980HK
• Vs Core i5-1235UL
• Vs Core i5-1245UE
• Vs Core i3-1215UL
• Vs Core i3-1215UE
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Core i3-N300
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Core i5-1350P
• Vs Core i5-1340P
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Core i5-1334U
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Core i5-13450HX
• Vs Core i7-1355U
• Vs Core i7-1365U
• Vs Core i3-1305U
• Vs Core i7-1370P
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i7-13850HX
• Vs Core i9-13900H
• Vs Ryzen 7 3750H
• Vs Core i9-9880H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625C
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825C
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425C
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700C
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
• Vs Ryzen 9 7845HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535U
|
|
|
