 |
Intel Core i7-13800H vs Intel Core i7-1260U |
|
Processor comparisons 02-02-2023
For example you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a choice by looking at the Intel Core i7-13800H vs Intel Core i7-1260U tests and understand which is better for games or simple use for video editing, machine learning, programming, streaming, rendering. Here is useful information from different benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A careful review of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications such as Dolphin Emulator, Furmark, Blender, AIDA64, DaVinci Resolve Studio, 3DMark, 7zip, SuperPi, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, MATLAB, Blender, Handbrake, VeraCrypt, PCMark 10, Gears 5, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PassMark, Prime95, RealBench, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), UserBenchmark, WPrime.
Gaming performance of processors in: - World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Halo Infinite
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Last Man Standing
- Borderlands 3
- Overwatch
- Valorant
- Apex Legends
- Valheim
- Fortnite
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Death Stranding
- DOOM: Eternal
- Fallout 76
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
After looking at the data of parallel benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i7-1260U or Intel Core i7-13800H.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i7-13800H | 59% |
Core i7-1260U | 55% |
This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i7-13800H is 6% better than Core i7-1260U. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i7-13800H | 58% |
Core i7-1260U | 54% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Forza Horizon 4, Metro Exodus, Half-Life: Alyx, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Ghostrunner, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Horizon Zero Dawn, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Monster Hunter World, League of Legends (LOL), DOTA 2A, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, NBA 2K20, Hitman 3, Control, Battlefield V, Microsoft Flight Simulator.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 102.2 | 95.1 | | Valorant | 116.2 | 108.1 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 65.1 | 60.5 | | Apex Legends | 109.2 | 101.6 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 87.1 | 81.0 | | Overwatch | 94.1 | 87.5 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 80.2 | 74.6 | | DOOM Eternal | 58.1 | 54.0 | | Warzone | 90.6 | 84.3 | | Assassin's Creed | 97.6 | 90.8 | | Valheim | 96.4 | 89.7 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i7-13800H | 140% |
Core i7-1260U | 463% |
To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i7-1260U is more energy efficient than the Core i7-13800H as it consumes less power: 45W vs. 9W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video editing or video rendering, machine learning, streaming, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the processor turns on all threads and cores that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i7-13800H |
Intel Core i7-1260U | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 295 | 230 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2867 | 1691 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 476 | 554 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 6345 | 3839 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1623 | 1297 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 18210 | 12654 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-13800H |
Intel Core i7-1260U | | Single-Core | 1486 | 3035 | | Multi-Core | 31020 | 17715 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-13800H |
Intel Core i7-1260U | | Single-Core | 1903 | 1251 | | Multi-Core | 13966 | 6947 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in the newest games. The savings are obvious! Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i7-13800H |
Intel Core i7-1260U | | Announcement date | January 28, 2023 | January 07, 2022 | | Type | Laptop | Laptop | | Socket | FCBGA1744 | FCBGA1744 | | Core name | Raptor Lake | Alder Lake-U | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 13 | 12 | | Turbo Frequency | 5.2 MHz | 4.7 MHz | | Frequency | 4 MHz | 1.1 MHz | | Cores | 14 | 10 | | Threads | 20 | 12 | | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 10 nm | | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 9800 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 45 W | 9 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5200 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5/x 6400 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5 5200 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 64 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 6500 | | | Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 45.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | 2 MB | | | L2 cache | 8 MB | | | L3 cache | 24 MB | 24 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | Expansion Options
| |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i7-13800H is 72% better than Core i7-1260U in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i7-13800H has 4 more core than Core i7-1260U. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-13800H is better: 31
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-1260U is better: 4
Although it should be realized that the summary data in the text above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of of people who bought Intel Core i7-13800H and Intel Core i7-1260U before deciding which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i7-13800H Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i9-13900HX
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Core i7-13700HX
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Core i9-13980HX
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Core i5-13450HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Core i5-13500HX
• Vs Core i7-12800H
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Core i9-12900HX
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX
• Vs Core i9-12900HK
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
• Vs Core i7-1365U
• Vs Core i9-11980HK
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS
• Vs Core i7-12850HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
• Vs Core i7-1370P
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H
• Vs Core i9-11950H
• Vs Core i7-12650HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900H
• Vs Core i3-1305U
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
• Vs Core i7-12650H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
• Vs Core i7-1360P
• Vs Core i5-13505H
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Core i5-12600H
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS
• Vs Core i9-12950HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Core i5-12600HX
• Vs Core i7-1280P
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Core i5-1155G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Core i5-1350P
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600U
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Core i5-11500H
• Vs Core i3-1115G4
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Ryzen 3 3250U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
• Vs Core i5-1250P
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Core i7-1355U
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U
• Vs Core i9-9980HK
• Vs Core i5-1340P
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500U
• Vs Core i9-10885H
• Vs Core i5-1135G7
• Vs Core i7-1165G7
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800U
• Vs Core i7-1270P
• Vs Core i7-1065G7
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition
• Vs Core i7-11390H
• Vs Ryzen 3 5400U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300U
• Vs Core i7-1255U
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Core i5-1230U
• Vs Core i5-1334U
• Vs Core i5-12450HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600U
• Vs Core i5-1245U
• Vs Core i9-10980HK
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
• Vs Ryzen 5 3580U
• Vs Core i3-1220P
• Vs Core i5-1235U
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U
• Vs Core i5-1240P
• Vs Core i5-1240U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625U
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Core i7-1250U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Core i5-1345U
• Vs Core i7-1265U
• Vs Core i7-13850HX
• Vs Core i9-13900H
• Vs Core i9-13905H
• Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7530U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
Intel Core i7-1260U Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i5-1230U
• Vs Core i5-1240U
• Vs Core i7-1250U
• Vs Core i3-1215U
• Vs Core i5-1235U
• Vs Core i5-1245U
• Vs Core i7-1255U
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Core i5-11500T
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600
• Vs Core i7-1265U
• Vs Core i5-11600T
• Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition
• Vs Core i7-9800X
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Core i5-11400F
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT
• Vs Core i3-1220P
• Vs Core i9-9900KF
• Vs Core i5-11400
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900H
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Core i5-11500
• Vs Core i7-7900X
• Vs Core i7-10700K
• Vs Core i9-9900KS
• Vs Core i7-10700KF
• Vs Core i5-11600
• Vs Core i9-10900E
• Vs Core i5-11400T
• Vs Core i7-7820X
• Vs Core i7-10700F
• Vs Core i7-6950X
• Vs Core i9-9900
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
• Vs Core i9-10900T
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
• Vs Core i9-10980HK
• Vs Core i9-10900TE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 1800X
• Vs Core i9-10885H
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
• Vs Core i3-12100TE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE
• Vs Core i7-1265UE
• Vs Core i7-1255UL
• Vs Core i5-1235UL
• Vs Core i5-1245UL
• Vs Core i5-1245UE
• Vs Core i3-1215UL
• Vs Core i3-1220PE
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Core i3-N300
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Core i7-1360P
• Vs Core i5-1350P
• Vs Core i5-1340P
• Vs Core i5-13500HX
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Core i5-1345U
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Core i5-1334U
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Core i7-1355U
• Vs Core i7-1365U
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Core i3-1305U
• Vs Core i7-1370P
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Core i9-9880H
|
|
|
