 |
Intel Core i7-13705H vs Intel Core i5-11320H |
|
Processor comparisons 02-02-2023
You may have difficulties with the choice of a CPU, you will solve them by reading the comprehensive tests Intel Core i7-13705H vs Intel Core i5-11320H and understand which is better for games or simple use for machine learning, video editing, rendering, programming, streaming. Here you can find useful information from different benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A thorough review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests such as Furmark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Prime95, WPrime, Dolphin Emulator, Gears 5, 7zip, UserBenchmark, Blender, Handbrake, MATLAB, SuperPi, AIDA64, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, PCMark 10, VeraCrypt, PassMark, RealBench, 3DMark, Blender, DaVinci Resolve Studio.
And how good the CPUs are in games: - Rainbow Six Siege
- Halo Infinite
- Valorant
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Valheim
- Apex Legends
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Overwatch
- Last Man Standing
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Borderlands 3
- Death Stranding
- Fallout 76
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Fortnite
- DOOM: Eternal
- Watch Dogs Legion
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i5-11320H or Intel Core i7-13705H.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i7-13705H | 58% |
Core i5-11320H | 54% |
This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i7-13705H is 6% better than Core i5-11320H. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i7-13705H | 57% |
Core i5-11320H | 53% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Microsoft Flight Simulator, NBA 2K20, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Control, Monster Hunter World, DOTA 2A, Ghostrunner, Battlefield V, Hitman 3, League of Legends (LOL), Half-Life: Alyx, Metro Exodus, Horizon Zero Dawn, Forza Horizon 4, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 101.4 | 94.2 | | Valorant | 115.3 | 107.1 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 64.5 | 60.0 | | Apex Legends | 108.3 | 100.6 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 86.4 | 80.3 | | Overwatch | 93.4 | 86.7 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 79.5 | 73.9 | | DOOM Eternal | 57.6 | 53.5 | | Warzone | 89.9 | 83.5 | | Assassin's Creed | 96.8 | 89.9 | | Valheim | 95.7 | 88.9 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The tested computers not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i7-13705H | 133% |
Core i5-11320H | 167% |
To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i5-11320H is more energy efficient than the Core i7-13705H as it consumes less power: 45W vs. 32W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, streaming, video editing or video rendering, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the processor uses all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i7-13705H |
Intel Core i5-11320H | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 280 | 228 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2705 | 1609 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 452 | 791 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 5982 | 2821 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1532 | 2028 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 17163 | 8928 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-13705H |
Intel Core i5-11320H | | Single-Core | 1403 | 4177 | | Multi-Core | 29234 | 14994 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-13705H |
Intel Core i5-11320H | | Single-Core | 1796 | 1611 | | Multi-Core | 13164 | 6090 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Intel Core i7-13705H |
Intel Core i5-11320H | | Announcement date | January 26, 2023 | May 01, 2021 | | Type | Laptop | Laptop | | Socket | FCBGA1792 | FCBGA1787 | | Core name | Raptor Lake | Tiger Lake | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 13 | 11 | | Turbo Frequency | 5 MHz | 4.5 MHz | | Frequency | 3.7 MHz | 3.2 MHz | | Cores | 14 | 4 | | Threads | 20 | 8 | | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | 4 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 10 nm | | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 1990 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 45 W | 32 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5200 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5/x 6400 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267 | | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 64 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 6500 | | | Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 51.2 GB/s | | L1 cache | 2 MB | | | L2 cache | 8 MB | | | L3 cache | 24 MB | 8 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | Expansion Options
| |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i7-13705H is 13% better than Core i5-11320H in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i7-13705H has 10 more core than Core i5-11320H. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-13705H is better: 30
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-11320H is better: 6
However, it should be understood that all the figures that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch the testing video and read the reviews of of people who bought Intel Core i7-13705H and Intel Core i5-11320H before deciding which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i7-13705H Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i9-13900HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Core i5-13505H
• Vs Core i7-13700HX
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Core i9-13980HX
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Core i5-13500HX
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Core i5-13450HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX
• Vs Core i7-12800H
• Vs Core i7-1370P
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs Core i9-11980HK
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Core i7-12850HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS
• Vs Core i5-12600H
• Vs Core i9-11950H
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Core i5-12600HX
• Vs Core i9-12900HX
• Vs Core i5-12450HX
• Vs Core i7-12650HX
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
• Vs Core i9-12950HX
• Vs Core i9-12900HK
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS
• Vs Core i7-12650H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600U
• Vs Core i5-1245U
• Vs Core i5-1334U
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825U
• Vs Core i7-1165G7
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900H
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Core i3-1220P
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Core i7-1270P
• Vs Core i5-1345U
• Vs Core i5-1340P
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS
• Vs Core i3-1305U
• Vs Core i7-1250U
• Vs Core i7-1360P
• Vs Core i5-1155G7
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Core i3-1115G4
• Vs Core i5-1135G7
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Core i7-1065G7
• Vs Core i5-11500H
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS
• Vs Core i7-1265U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Core i7-1260U
• Vs Core i7-1355U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Core i5-1350P
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Core i5-1250P
• Vs Core i7-1280P
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600H
• Vs Core i7-1255U
• Vs Core i5-1240P
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500U
• Vs Core i7-1365U
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Ryzen 3 3250U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625U
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
• Vs Pentium 8505
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U
• Vs Pentium 8500
• Vs Core i5-1240U
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Core i5-1230U
• Vs Celeron 7300
• Vs Core i9-10885H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600U
• Vs Core i9-10880H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U
• Vs Core i5-11300H
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425U
• Vs Core i9-9880H
• Vs Core i7-11390H
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
• Vs Core i5-1235U
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Core i3-N300
• Vs Core i7-13800H
• Vs Core i7-13850HX
• Vs Core i9-13900H
• Vs Core i9-13905H
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7530U
Intel Core i5-11320H Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i9-10880H
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Core i9-10885H
• Vs Ryzen 7 1800X
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G
• Vs Core i9-10900TE
• Vs Core i9-10980HK
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
• Vs Core i9-10900T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Core i9-9900
• Vs Core i7-6950X
• Vs Core i7-10700F
• Vs Core i7-7820X
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800U
• Vs Core i5-11400T
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Core i9-10900E
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Core i5-10600KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE
• Vs Core i7-9700KF
• Vs Core i7-8086K
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600U
• Vs Core i5-10600K
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700E
• Vs Core i7-9700K
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Core i5-11260H
• Vs Core i5-10600
• Vs Core i7-8700K
• Vs Core i9-9900T
• Vs Core i7-6900K
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600U
• Vs Core i7-9700F
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600E
• Vs Core i7-9700
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500X
• Vs Core i5-10500
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600
• Vs Xeon W-10855M
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U
• Vs Xeon W-11855M
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Celeron 7300
• Vs Celeron 7305
• Vs Pentium 8500
• Vs Pentium 8505
• Vs Core i3-1210U
• Vs Core i5-1230U
• Vs Core i5-1240U
• Vs Core i3-1215U
• Vs Core i5-1235U
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625U
• Vs Core i9-9880H
• Vs Core i9-9980HK
• Vs Core i3-1215UL
• Vs Core i3-1215UE
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Core i3-N300
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Core i5-1340P
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Core i7-1355U
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i7-13850HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625C
• Vs Ryzen 7 3750H
• Vs Ryzen 3 7320U
|
|
|
