 |
Intel Core i7-13705H vs Intel Pentium 8505 |
|
Processor comparisons 02-02-2023
Let's say there are difficulties with the choice of a CPU, you will solve them by reading the comprehensive tests Intel Core i7-13705H vs Intel Pentium 8505 and decide which is better for games or simple use for rendering, programming, video editing, machine learning, streaming. Here is all information from various benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A thorough review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like Furmark, VeraCrypt, Blender, SuperPi, Gears 5, PCMark 10, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), PassMark, 3DMark, Dolphin Emulator, UserBenchmark, Prime95, AIDA64, RealBench, Handbrake, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Blender, 7zip, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, WPrime, DaVinci Resolve Studio, MATLAB.
Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Valorant
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Fortnite
- Fallout 76
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Apex Legends
- DOOM: Eternal
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Halo Infinite
- Last Man Standing
- Death Stranding
- Borderlands 3
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Overwatch
- Valheim
After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Pentium 8505 or Intel Core i7-13705H.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i7-13705H | 58% |
Pentium 8505 | 54% |
This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i7-13705H is 6% better than Pentium 8505. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i7-13705H | 57% |
Pentium 8505 | 53% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Half-Life: Alyx, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, DOTA 2A, Monster Hunter World, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Horizon Zero Dawn, NBA 2K20, Control, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Ghostrunner, Metro Exodus, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Forza Horizon 4, League of Legends (LOL), PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Hitman 3, Battlefield V, Shadow of the Tomb Raider.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 101.4 | 93.8 | | Valorant | 115.3 | 106.6 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 64.5 | 59.7 | | Apex Legends | 108.3 | 100.2 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 86.4 | 80.0 | | Overwatch | 93.4 | 86.4 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 79.5 | 73.6 | | DOOM Eternal | 57.6 | 53.3 | | Warzone | 89.9 | 83.2 | | Assassin's Creed | 96.8 | 89.6 | | Valheim | 95.7 | 88.5 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i7-13705H | 133% |
Pentium 8505 | 228% |
To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Pentium 8505 is more energy efficient than the Core i7-13705H since it has less power consumption: 45W vs. 15W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, programming, video rendering or video editing, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum performance, the processor uses all cores and threads that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i7-13705H |
Intel Pentium 8505 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 280 | 190 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2705 | 1390 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 452 | 455 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 5982 | 3157 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1532 | 1067 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 17163 | 10406 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-13705H |
Intel Pentium 8505 | | Single-Core | 1403 | 2496 | | Multi-Core | 29234 | 14568 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-13705H |
Intel Pentium 8505 | | Single-Core | 1796 | 1029 | | Multi-Core | 13164 | 5713 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in new games. It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Core i7-13705H |
Intel Pentium 8505 | | Announcement date | January 26, 2023 | January 07, 2022 | | Type | Laptop | Laptop | | Socket | FCBGA1792 | FCBGA1744 | | Core name | Raptor Lake | Alder Lake-U | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 13 | 12 | | Turbo Frequency | 5 MHz | 4.4 MHz | | Frequency | 3.7 MHz | 1.2 MHz | | Cores | 14 | 5 | | Threads | 20 | 6 | | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 10 nm | | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 9800 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 45 W | 15 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5200 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5/x 6400 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5 5200 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 32 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 6500 | | | Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 45.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | 2 MB | | | L2 cache | 8 MB | | | L3 cache | 24 MB | 24 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | Expansion Options
| |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i7-13705H is 67% better than Pentium 8505 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i7-13705H has 9 more core than Pentium 8505. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-13705H is better: 32
The number of parameters for which Intel Pentium 8505 is better: 4
Although it should be realized that all the number in the table above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Core i7-13705H and Intel Pentium 8505 before making a selection which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i7-13705H Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i9-13900HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Core i5-13505H
• Vs Core i7-13700HX
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Core i9-13980HX
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Core i5-13500HX
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Core i5-13450HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX
• Vs Core i7-12800H
• Vs Core i7-1370P
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs Core i9-11980HK
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Core i7-12850HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS
• Vs Core i5-12600H
• Vs Core i9-11950H
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Core i5-12600HX
• Vs Core i9-12900HX
• Vs Core i5-12450HX
• Vs Core i7-12650HX
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
• Vs Core i9-12950HX
• Vs Core i9-12900HK
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS
• Vs Core i7-12650H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600U
• Vs Core i5-1245U
• Vs Core i5-1334U
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825U
• Vs Core i7-1165G7
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900H
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Core i3-1220P
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Core i7-1270P
• Vs Core i5-1345U
• Vs Core i5-1340P
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS
• Vs Core i3-1305U
• Vs Core i7-1250U
• Vs Core i7-1360P
• Vs Core i5-1155G7
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Core i3-1115G4
• Vs Core i5-1135G7
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Core i7-1065G7
• Vs Core i5-11500H
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS
• Vs Core i7-1265U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Core i7-1260U
• Vs Core i7-1355U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Core i5-1350P
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Core i5-1250P
• Vs Core i7-1280P
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600H
• Vs Core i7-1255U
• Vs Core i5-1240P
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500U
• Vs Core i7-1365U
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Ryzen 3 3250U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625U
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U
• Vs Pentium 8500
• Vs Core i5-1240U
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Core i5-1230U
• Vs Celeron 7300
• Vs Core i9-10885H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600U
• Vs Core i5-11320H
• Vs Core i9-10880H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U
• Vs Core i5-11300H
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425U
• Vs Core i9-9880H
• Vs Core i7-11390H
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
• Vs Core i5-1235U
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Core i3-N300
• Vs Core i7-13800H
• Vs Core i7-13850HX
• Vs Core i9-13900H
• Vs Core i9-13905H
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7530U
Intel Pentium 8505 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Celeron 7300
• Vs Celeron 7305
• Vs Pentium 8500
• Vs Core i7-9700K
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700E
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Core i5-10600K
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600U
• Vs Core i7-8086K
• Vs Core i7-9700KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE
• Vs Core i5-10600KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
• Vs Core i5-11320H
• Vs Core i9-10880H
• Vs Xeon W-11855M
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700X
• Vs Core i3-1210U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
• Vs Core i3-1215U
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Core i9-10885H
• Vs Ryzen 7 1800X
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G
• Vs Core i9-10900TE
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Core i5-11260H
• Vs Core i5-10600
• Vs Core i7-8700K
• Vs Core i9-9900T
• Vs Core i7-6900K
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600U
• Vs Core i7-9700F
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600E
• Vs Core i7-9700
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500X
• Vs Core i5-10500
• Vs Xeon W-10855M
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600
• Vs Core i7-11390H
• Vs Core i7-10700T
• Vs Core i7-8700
• Vs Core i5-11300H
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
• Vs Core i3-1210U
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625U
• Vs Core i9-9880H
• Vs Core i9-9980HK
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600X
• Vs Core i3-1215UL
• Vs Core i3-1215UE
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Core i3-N300
• Vs Core i5-1334U
• Vs Core i7-1355U
• Vs Core i7-1365U
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Core i3-1305U
• Vs Core i7-1370P
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
|
|
|
