 |
Intel Core i7-13705H vs Intel Core i9-10880H |
|
Processor comparisons 02-02-2023
Let's say there are difficulties with the choice of a CPU, you will solve them by reading the detailed tests Intel Core i7-13705H vs Intel Core i9-10880H and understand which is better for games or normal use for machine learning, programming, video editing, rendering, streaming. Here you can find all information from several benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software like Gears 5, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), DaVinci Resolve Studio, AIDA64, SuperPi, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Dolphin Emulator, 3DMark, VeraCrypt, 7zip, Prime95, UserBenchmark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, RealBench, WPrime, Blender, PCMark 10, MATLAB, Handbrake, Furmark, PassMark, Blender.
Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Fallout 76
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Halo Infinite
- Watch Dogs Legion
- DOOM: Eternal
- Overwatch
- Fortnite
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Apex Legends
- Last Man Standing
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Valorant
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Death Stranding
- Borderlands 3
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Valheim
After looking at the data of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i9-10880H or Intel Core i7-13705H.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i7-13705H | 58% |
Core i9-10880H | 54% |
The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i7-13705H is 6% better than Core i9-10880H. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i7-13705H | 57% |
Core i9-10880H | 54% |
For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of other games in which processors were compared: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Metro Exodus, League of Legends (LOL), DOTA 2A, Ghostrunner, Half-Life: Alyx, Forza Horizon 4, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Monster Hunter World, Horizon Zero Dawn, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Control, NBA 2K20, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Battlefield V, Hitman 3.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 101.4 | 95.8 | | Valorant | 115.3 | 108.9 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 64.5 | 61.0 | | Apex Legends | 108.3 | 102.3 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 86.4 | 81.6 | | Overwatch | 93.4 | 88.2 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 79.5 | 75.1 | | DOOM Eternal | 57.6 | 54.4 | | Warzone | 89.9 | 84.9 | | Assassin's Creed | 96.8 | 91.4 | | Valheim | 95.7 | 90.3 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i7-13705H | 133% |
Core i9-10880H | 92% |
To make a final resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i7-13705H is more energy efficient than the Core i9-10880H since it has less power consumption: 45W vs. 45W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video rendering or video editing, streaming, programming, machine learning, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the processor turns on all cores and threads that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i7-13705H |
Intel Core i9-10880H | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 280 | 203 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2705 | 1506 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 452 | 469 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 5982 | 3372 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1532 | 1052 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 17163 | 10194 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-13705H |
Intel Core i9-10880H | | Single-Core | 1403 | 2804 | | Multi-Core | 29234 | 15355 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-13705H |
Intel Core i9-10880H | | Single-Core | 1796 | 1250 | | Multi-Core | 13164 | 7637 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Intel Core i7-13705H |
Intel Core i9-10880H | | Announcement date | January 26, 2023 | April 01, 2020 | | Type | Laptop | Laptop | | Socket | FCBGA1792 | FCBGA1440 | | Core name | Raptor Lake | Coffee Lake | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 13 | 9 | | Turbo Frequency | 5 MHz | 4.8 MHz | | Frequency | 3.7 MHz | 2.3 MHz | | Cores | 14 | 8 | | Threads | 20 | 16 | | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm | | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 9200 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 45 W | 45 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5200 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5/x 6400 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | DDR4-2666, LPDDR3-2133 | | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 128 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 6500 | | | Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 41.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | 2 MB | | | L2 cache | 8 MB | | | L3 cache | 24 MB | 16 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | Expansion Options
| |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i7-13705H is 37% better than Core i9-10880H in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i7-13705H has 6 more core than Core i9-10880H. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-13705H is better: 32
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-10880H is better: 4
Although it should be understood that all the number in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should totally trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch the video tests and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Core i7-13705H and Intel Core i9-10880H before making a choice which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i7-13705H Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i9-13900HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Core i5-13505H
• Vs Core i7-13700HX
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Core i9-13980HX
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Core i5-13500HX
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Core i5-13450HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX
• Vs Core i7-12800H
• Vs Core i7-1370P
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs Core i9-11980HK
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Core i7-12850HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS
• Vs Core i5-12600H
• Vs Core i9-11950H
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Core i5-12600HX
• Vs Core i9-12900HX
• Vs Core i5-12450HX
• Vs Core i7-12650HX
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
• Vs Core i9-12950HX
• Vs Core i9-12900HK
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS
• Vs Core i7-12650H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600U
• Vs Core i5-1245U
• Vs Core i5-1334U
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825U
• Vs Core i7-1165G7
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900H
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Core i3-1220P
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Core i7-1270P
• Vs Core i5-1345U
• Vs Core i5-1340P
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS
• Vs Core i3-1305U
• Vs Core i7-1250U
• Vs Core i7-1360P
• Vs Core i5-1155G7
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Core i3-1115G4
• Vs Core i5-1135G7
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Core i7-1065G7
• Vs Core i5-11500H
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS
• Vs Core i7-1265U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Core i7-1260U
• Vs Core i7-1355U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Core i5-1350P
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Core i5-1250P
• Vs Core i7-1280P
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600H
• Vs Core i7-1255U
• Vs Core i5-1240P
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500U
• Vs Core i7-1365U
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Ryzen 3 3250U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625U
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
• Vs Pentium 8505
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U
• Vs Pentium 8500
• Vs Core i5-1240U
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Core i5-1230U
• Vs Celeron 7300
• Vs Core i9-10885H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600U
• Vs Core i5-11320H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U
• Vs Core i5-11300H
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425U
• Vs Core i9-9880H
• Vs Core i7-11390H
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
• Vs Core i5-1235U
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Core i3-N300
• Vs Core i7-13800H
• Vs Core i7-13850HX
• Vs Core i9-13900H
• Vs Core i9-13905H
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7530U
Intel Core i9-10880H Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Core i9-10885H
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G
• Vs Core i9-10980HK
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
• Vs Core i9-10900T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Core i9-9900
• Vs Core i7-6950X
• Vs Core i7-10700F
• Vs Core i7-7820X
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800U
• Vs Core i5-11400T
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Core i7-10700
• Vs Core i5-11500T
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600
• Vs Core i5-11600T
• Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition
• Vs Core i7-9800X
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600U
• Vs Core i5-10600K
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Core i7-9700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Core i5-10600
• Vs Core i7-8700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600E
• Vs Core i7-9700
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500X
• Vs Core i5-10500
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600
• Vs Core i7-10700T
• Vs Core i7-8700
• Vs Core i5-11300H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
• Vs Ryzen 3 3300X
• Vs Core i7-9700E
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Core i5-10400F
• Vs Core i5-10400
• Vs Core i7-11375H
• Vs Ryzen 7 1800X
• Vs Core i5-10600KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
• Vs Core i7-9700KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
• Vs Core i7-8086K
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
• Vs Core i9-9900T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700E
• Vs Core i7-6900K
• Vs Core i7-9700F
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700X
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
• Vs Core i9-10900TE
• Vs Core i9-10900E
• Vs Core i5-11320H
• Vs Core i5-11260H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U
• Vs Xeon W-11855M
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Celeron 7300
• Vs Pentium 8500
• Vs Pentium 8505
• Vs Core i3-1210U
• Vs Core i5-1230U
• Vs Core i5-1240U
• Vs Core i3-1215U
• Vs Core i5-1235U
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625U
• Vs Core i9-9880H
• Vs Core i9-9980HK
• Vs Core i3-1215UL
• Vs Core i3-1215UE
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Core i3-N300
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Core i5-1340P
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Core i5-1334U
• Vs Core i5-13450HX
• Vs Core i7-1355U
• Vs Core i7-1365U
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Core i3-1305U
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i7-13850HX
• Vs Core i9-13905H
|
|
|
