|
Intel Core i9-13905H vs Intel Core i7-13705H |
|
Processor comparisons 02-02-2023 Let's say you have difficulties with the choice of a CPU, you will solve them by reading the comprehensive tests Intel Core i9-13905H vs Intel Core i7-13705H and see which is better for games or simple use for programming, rendering, machine learning, video editing, streaming. Here is useful information from real video editing and streaming tests or many benchmarks. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests such as Blender, MATLAB, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Furmark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, WPrime, AIDA64, 3DMark, Gears 5, Prime95, DaVinci Resolve Studio, UserBenchmark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), 7zip, PassMark, Blender, PCMark 10, VeraCrypt, SuperPi, Handbrake, Dolphin Emulator, RealBench. Gaming performance of processors in: - Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Last Man Standing
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Halo Infinite
- Borderlands 3
- DOOM: Eternal
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Fallout 76
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Overwatch
- Apex Legends
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Fortnite
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Valheim
- Valorant
- Death Stranding
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i7-13705H or Intel Core i9-13905H.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i9-13905H | 59% |
Core i7-13705H | 58% | This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i9-13905H is 1% better than Core i7-13705H. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i9-13905H | 58% |
Core i7-13705H | 57% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Hitman 3, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Horizon Zero Dawn, Control, Half-Life: Alyx, Monster Hunter World, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Metro Exodus, Forza Horizon 4, Battlefield V, DOTA 2A, Ghostrunner, NBA 2K20, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, League of Legends (LOL).
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 103.5 | 101.4 | Valorant | 117.7 | 115.3 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 65.9 | 64.5 | Apex Legends | 110.6 | 108.3 | Call of Duty Warzone | 88.2 | 86.4 | Overwatch | 95.3 | 93.4 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 81.2 | 79.5 | DOOM Eternal | 58.8 | 57.6 | Warzone | 91.8 | 89.9 | Assassin's Creed | 98.8 | 96.8 | Valheim | 97.7 | 95.7 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i9-13905H | 141% |
Core i7-13705H | 133% | To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i9-13905H is more energy efficient than the Core i7-13705H as it consumes less power: 45W vs. 45W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video editing or video rendering, machine learning, streaming, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the processor turns on all threads and cores that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i9-13905H |
Intel Core i7-13705H | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 317 | 280 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 3013 | 2705 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 508 | 452 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 6656 | 5982 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1709 | 1532 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 19084 | 17163 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-13905H |
Intel Core i7-13705H | Single-Core | 1564 | 1403 | Multi-Core | 32503 | 29234 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-13905H |
Intel Core i7-13705H | Single-Core | 1907 | 1796 | Multi-Core | 15235 | 13164 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Intel Core i9-13905H |
Intel Core i7-13705H | Announcement date | January 17, 2023 | January 26, 2023 | Type | Laptop | Laptop | Socket | FCBGA1792 | FCBGA1792 | Core name | Raptor Lake | Raptor Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 13 | 13 | Turbo Frequency | 5.4 MHz | 5 MHz | Frequency | 4.1 MHz | 3.7 MHz | Cores | 14 | 14 | Threads | 20 | 20 | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | 16 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 14200 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 45 W | 45 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5200 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5/x 6400 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | Up to DDR5 5200 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5/x 6400 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 64 Gb | Memory Frequency | 6500 | 6500 | Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 89.6 GB/s | L1 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | L2 cache | 8 MB | 8 MB | L3 cache | 24 MB | 24 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | Expansion Options
| Expansion Options
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i9-13905H is 9% better than Core i7-13705H in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-13905H is better: 23
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-13705H is better: 1 However, it should be realized that all the number in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch the testing video and read the opinion of real owners of Intel Core i9-13905H and Intel Core i7-13705H before deciding which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i9-13905H Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i9-13900H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i7-13800H • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Core i5-13420H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Core i5-13450HX • Vs Core i7-13620H • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i7-13850HX • Vs Core i7-13650HX • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Core i5-12450HX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 6800U • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Core i5-1155G7 • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Ryzen 9 4900H • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Ryzen 5 6600H • Vs Core i9-10980HK • Vs Core i9-10880H • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Ryzen 5 6600U • Vs Core i5-11500H • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Core i9-10885H • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U • Vs Core i5-12600HX • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H • Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7736U • Vs Ryzen 5 7530U • Vs Ryzen 3 7330U • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
Intel Core i7-13705H Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Core i7-13650HX • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i5-13420H • Vs Core i7-13620H • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Core i5-13450HX • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i7-1370P • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Core i5-12600HX • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i5-12450HX • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Ryzen 5 6600U • Vs Core i5-1245U • Vs Core i5-1334U • Vs Core i5-1335U • Vs Ryzen 7 5825U • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS • Vs Ryzen 9 4900H • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i3-1220P • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Core i7-1270P • Vs Core i5-1345U • Vs Core i5-1340P • Vs Core i3-1315U • Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS • Vs Core i3-1305U • Vs Core i7-1250U • Vs Core i7-1360P • Vs Core i5-1155G7 • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Core i5-11500H • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS • Vs Core i7-1265U • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Core i7-1260U • Vs Core i7-1355U • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Ryzen 7 6800U • Vs Core i5-1350P • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Core i5-1250P • Vs Core i7-1280P • Vs Ryzen 5 6600H • Vs Core i7-1255U • Vs Core i5-1240P • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Core i7-1365U • Vs Core i7-1260P • Vs Ryzen 3 3250U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 5625U • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U • Vs Pentium 8505 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U • Vs Pentium 8500 • Vs Core i5-1240U • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Core i5-1230U • Vs Celeron 7300 • Vs Core i9-10885H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U • Vs Ryzen 5 4600U • Vs Core i5-11320H • Vs Core i9-10880H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U • Vs Core i5-11300H • Vs Ryzen 3 5425U • Vs Core i9-9880H • Vs Core i7-11390H • Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS • Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U • Vs Core i5-1235U • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Core i3-N300 • Vs Core i7-13800H • Vs Core i7-13850HX • Vs Core i9-13900H • Vs Core i3-N305 • Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7530U
| |
|