|
Intel Core i7-13705H vs AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS |
|
Processor comparisons 02-02-2023 For example you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a choice by looking at the Intel Core i7-13705H vs AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS tests and decide which is better for games or normal use for rendering, machine learning, programming, streaming, video editing. Here is all information from real streaming and video editing tests or various benchmarks. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests such as Blender, Gears 5, PCMark 10, VeraCrypt, MATLAB, Handbrake, 7zip, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, 3DMark, Dolphin Emulator, PassMark, UserBenchmark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, WPrime, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Furmark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, AIDA64, Blender, RealBench, Prime95, SuperPi. And how good the CPUs are in games: - Valorant
- Halo Infinite
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- DOOM: Eternal
- Last Man Standing
- Borderlands 3
- Fortnite
- Apex Legends
- Rainbow Six Siege
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Valheim
- Fallout 76
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Overwatch
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Death Stranding
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS or Intel Core i7-13705H.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i7-13705H | 58% |
Ryzen 7 6800HS | 57% | This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i7-13705H is 1% better than Ryzen 7 6800HS. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i7-13705H | 57% |
Ryzen 7 6800HS | 54% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, League of Legends (LOL), Half-Life: Alyx, Horizon Zero Dawn, DOTA 2A, Forza Horizon 4, Hitman 3, Ghostrunner, Control, Battlefield V, NBA 2K20, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Monster Hunter World, Microsoft Flight Simulator, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Metro Exodus.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 101.4 | 96.6 | Valorant | 115.3 | 109.8 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 64.5 | 61.5 | Apex Legends | 108.3 | 103.2 | Call of Duty Warzone | 86.4 | 82.4 | Overwatch | 93.4 | 88.9 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 79.5 | 75.8 | DOOM Eternal | 57.6 | 54.9 | Warzone | 89.9 | 85.7 | Assassin's Creed | 96.8 | 92.2 | Valheim | 95.7 | 91.1 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The tested computers not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i7-13705H | 133% |
Ryzen 7 6800HS | 144% | To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Ryzen 7 6800HS is more energy efficient than the Core i7-13705H since it has less power consumption: 45W vs. 35W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, programming, video rendering or video editing, machine learning, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the CPU includes all threads and cores that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i7-13705H |
AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 280 | 230 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2705 | 2348 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 452 | 555 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 5982 | 5163 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1532 | 1456 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 17163 | 13156 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-13705H |
AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS | Single-Core | 1403 | 3134 | Multi-Core | 29234 | 26025 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-13705H |
AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS | Single-Core | 1796 | 1518 | Multi-Core | 13164 | 8464 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Core i7-13705H |
AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS | Announcement date | January 26, 2023 | January 09, 2022 | Type | Laptop | Laptop | Socket | FCBGA1792 | FP7 | Core name | Raptor Lake | Rembrandt | Architecture | x86 | Zen 3+ | Generation | 13 | 6 | Turbo Frequency | 5 MHz | 4.7 MHz | Frequency | 3.7 MHz | 3.2 MHz | Cores | 14 | 8 | Threads | 20 | 16 | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 6 nm | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 10200 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 45 W | 35 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5200 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5/x 6400 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | DDR5 | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 6500 | 3200 | Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | | L1 cache | 2 MB | 512KB | L2 cache | 8 MB | 4MB | L3 cache | 24 MB | 16MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | Expansion Options
| FP7:100-000000545 FP7r7:100-000000561
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i7-13705H is 13% better than Ryzen 7 6800HS in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i7-13705H has 6 more core than Ryzen 7 6800HS. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-13705H is better: 32
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS is better: 5 Although it should be realized that all the data in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should totally trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch the video tests and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Core i7-13705H and AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS before making a selection which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i7-13705H Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Core i7-13650HX • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i5-13420H • Vs Core i7-13620H • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Core i5-13450HX • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i7-1370P • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Core i5-12600HX • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i5-12450HX • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Ryzen 5 6600U • Vs Core i5-1245U • Vs Core i5-1334U • Vs Core i5-1335U • Vs Ryzen 7 5825U • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS • Vs Ryzen 9 4900H • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i3-1220P • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Core i7-1270P • Vs Core i5-1345U • Vs Core i5-1340P • Vs Core i3-1315U • Vs Core i3-1305U • Vs Core i7-1250U • Vs Core i7-1360P • Vs Core i5-1155G7 • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Core i5-11500H • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS • Vs Core i7-1265U • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Core i7-1260U • Vs Core i7-1355U • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Ryzen 7 6800U • Vs Core i5-1350P • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Core i5-1250P • Vs Core i7-1280P • Vs Ryzen 5 6600H • Vs Core i7-1255U • Vs Core i5-1240P • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Core i7-1365U • Vs Core i7-1260P • Vs Ryzen 3 3250U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 5625U • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U • Vs Pentium 8505 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U • Vs Pentium 8500 • Vs Core i5-1240U • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Core i5-1230U • Vs Celeron 7300 • Vs Core i9-10885H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U • Vs Ryzen 5 4600U • Vs Core i5-11320H • Vs Core i9-10880H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U • Vs Core i5-11300H • Vs Ryzen 3 5425U • Vs Core i9-9880H • Vs Core i7-11390H • Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS • Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U • Vs Core i5-1235U • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Core i3-N300 • Vs Core i7-13800H • Vs Core i7-13850HX • Vs Core i9-13900H • Vs Core i9-13905H • Vs Core i3-N305 • Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7530U
AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Ryzen 5 6600H • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Core i9-10920X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990X • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Core i9-7940X • Vs Core i9-7960X • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Core i5-12600HE • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X • Vs Ryzen 7 6800U • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Core i9-9920X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Core i3-12300HE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 5 6600U • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Core i9-7920X • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Core i7-1270PE • Vs Core i5-12500HL • Vs Core i5-12450HX • Vs Core i5-12600HL • Vs Core i5-12600HX • Vs Core i3-12300HL • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i3-N305 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Core i7-1360P • Vs Core i5-1350P • Vs Core i5-1340P • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-1345U • Vs Core i5-1335U • Vs Core i5-1334U • Vs Core i5-13420H • Vs Core i5-13450HX • Vs Core i7-1355U • Vs Core i7-1365U • Vs Core i3-1315U • Vs Core i3-1305U • Vs Core i7-1370P • Vs Core i7-13620H • Vs Core i7-13650HX • Vs Core i7-13800H • Vs Core i7-13850HX • Vs Core i9-13900H • Vs Core i9-13905H • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Ryzen 5 5625C • Vs Ryzen 7 5825C • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Ryzen 7 3750H • Vs Ryzen 9 7945HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7845HX • Vs Ryzen 7 7745HX • Vs Ryzen 5 7645HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7940HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7840HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7736U • Vs Ryzen 7 7735U • Vs Ryzen 5 7535U • Vs Ryzen 5 7530U • Vs Ryzen 3 7330U • Vs Ryzen 5 5560U • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
| |
|