Intel Atom x3-C3200RK vs Intel Atom x3-C3130

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   Well, which processor or chip is better? Detailed data of benchmarks and speed tests Intel Atom x3-C3200RK vs Intel Atom x3-C3130, compare of GPUs Mali-400 MP2 and Mali-450 MP4.
   This performance comparison involves two processors: Atom x3-C3200RK is quad-core () and Atom x3-C3130 is dual-core (SoFIA). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications of the SoCs, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table.
   From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in special testing software such as Geekbench, WebXPRT 3, Mozilla Kraken, PassMark, Octane V2, Neocore, GFXBench, AnTuTu, 3DMark, Quadrant, Vellamo, PCMark, even the gaming performance of processors in Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Sniper 3D, Fortnite, Call of Duty: Mobile, Minecraft Bedrock, Mortal Kombat, PUBG, Real Racing 3 etc.
   After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy Atom x3-C3200RK or Atom x3-C3130 and which chip is better for gaming: Asphalt 9, Madout2, CSR Racing 2, Need for Speed No Limits.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Atom x3-C3200RK

Atom x3-C3130

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Atom x3-C3200RK

26%

Atom x3-C3130

26%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Atom x3-C3200RK

Atom x3-C3130

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Atom x3-C3200RK	Atom x3-C3130
Total score	19384	15909
CPU	5426	4444
GPU	7356	6045
MEM	3101	2544
UX	3489	2873

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Atom x3-C3200RK	Atom x3-C3130
Single-Core	51	42
Multi-Core	236	194

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Atom x3-C3200RK	Atom x3-C3130
Frequency	1100 MHz	1000 MHz
Cores	4	2
Bit	64	64
Lithography	28 nm	28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x1.1 GHz	2x1.0 GHz SoFIA
Power consumption (TDP)	7 W	7 W
Memory type	LPDDR2/3	LPDDR2
Max. Memory	2 Gb	1 Gb
Memory Frequency	1333	800
Memory bandwidth	4	4
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	128 KB	128 KB
L2 cache	2 MB	2 MB
L3 cache	8 MB	8 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Atom x3-C3200RK is 9% better than Atom x3-C3130 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Atom x3-C3200RK has -2 more core than Atom x3-C3130. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-450 MP4	Mali-400 MP2
GPU Frequency	600 MHz	600 MHz
GFloPS	35.77	10.8
# of Cores	4	2
# of Shader Units
Display	1920 x 1080 pixels	1280 x 800 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	6.9	5.6
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	16.4	13.2
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	10.5	8.1
Call of Duty: Mobile	9.1	7.4
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	13.6	10.6
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	20.5	16.3
Real Racing 3	15.8	12.2
Sniper 3D	16.8	17.8
Need for Speed No Limits	14.7	13
Mortal Kombat X	13.7	9.3
CSR Racing 2	14.7	8.9

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly.
Due to the low performance of the processors, the results of the gaming tests are calculated by analogy with other more powerful CPUs from the site database. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	13 MP	8 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	FullHD	FullHD
Codec support	H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC	H.264

Networks and Navigation

Modem		A-GOLD 620
Download speed	21 MBit/s.	21 MBit/s.
Upload speed	6 MBit/s.	6 MBit/s.
Navigation
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Atom x3-C3200RK is better: 28
The number of parameters for which Intel Atom x3-C3130 is better: 1
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of joint comparison and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs Atom x3-C3200RK and Atom x3-C3130, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

Atom x3-C3200RK SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Atom x3-C3200RK specs and review.

Atom x3-C3130 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Atom x3-C3130 specs and review.