|
Intel Atom Z2520 vs Intel Atom x3-C3130 |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 So, which chip or processor is better? Detailed comparison data of benchmarks Intel Atom Z2520 vs Intel Atom x3-C3130, speed examination of GPUs PowerVR SGX544 and Mali-400 MP2. This performance comparison includes two processors: Atom Z2520 is dual-core (Cloverview) and Atom x3-C3130 is dual-core (SoFIA). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A careful analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in special testing software like Octane V2, WebXPRT 3, GFXBench, AnTuTu 8, Vellamo, Quadrant, Mozilla Kraken, Geekbench, PCMark, 3DMark, Neocore, PassMark, and how good the CPUs are in games Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Fortnite, Call of Duty: Mobile, Mortal Kombat, Minecraft Bedrock, Sniper 3D, PUBG, Real Racing 3 etc. After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which processors is better to buy Atom Z2520 or Atom x3-C3130 and which chip is better for gaming: Need for Speed No Limits, Asphalt 9, CSR Racing 2, Madout2.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreAtom Z2520 | 1% |
Atom x3-C3130 | 1% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Atom Z2520 | 14% |
Atom x3-C3130 | 26% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingAtom Z2520 | 1% |
Atom x3-C3130 | 1% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Atom Z2520 |
Atom x3-C3130 | Total score | 11918 | 15909 | CPU | 3335 | 4444 | GPU | 4536 | 6045 | MEM | 1906 | 2544 | UX | 2154 | 2873 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Atom Z2520 |
Atom x3-C3130 | Single-Core | 31 | 42 | Multi-Core | 145 | 194 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Atom Z2520 |
Atom x3-C3130 | Frequency | 1200 MHz | 1000 MHz | Cores | 2 | 2 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 32 nm | 28 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 2x1.2 GHz Cloverview | 2x1.0 GHz SoFIA | Power consumption (TDP) | 7 W | 7 W | Memory type | LPDDR2 | LPDDR2 | Max. Memory | 2 Gb | 1 Gb | Memory Frequency | 1066 | 800 | Memory bandwidth | 4 | 4 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB | L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | L3 cache | 8 MB | 8 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Atom Z2520 is 16% better than Atom x3-C3130 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | PowerVR SGX544 | Mali-400 MP2 | GPU Frequency | 533 MHz | 600 MHz | GFloPS | 17.06 | 10.8 | # of Cores | 1 | 2 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 1280 x 800 pixels | 1280 x 800 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 3.2 | 5.6 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 9.8 | 13.2 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 5.3 | 8.1 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 5.9 | 7.4 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 7.7 | 10.6 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 11.5 | 16.3 | Real Racing 3 | 9.3 | 12.2 | Sniper 3D | 10.1 | 17.8 | Need for Speed No Limits | 9.5 | 13 | Mortal Kombat X | 6.9 | 9.3 | CSR Racing 2 | 6.9 | 8.9 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. Due to the low performance of the processors, the results of the gaming tests are calculated by analogy with other more powerful CPUs from the site database. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 8 MP | 8 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | FullHD | Codec support | H.264 | H.264 |
Networks and NavigationModem | Intel XMM 7160 | A-GOLD 620 | Download speed | 72 MBit/s. | 21 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 6 MBit/s. | 6 MBit/s. | Navigation | | | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Atom Z2520 is better: 6
The number of parameters for which Intel Atom x3-C3130 is better: 21 Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of parallel comparison and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
Atom Z2520 SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek MT8312CW • Vs MediaTek MT8312 • Vs MediaTek MT6570 • Vs MediaTek MT6572A • Vs MediaTek MT6572 • Vs MediaTek MT6589 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731 • Vs Atom x3-C3230RK • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026 • Vs Rockchip RK3126C • Vs MediaTek MT6735M • Vs MediaTek MT6580A • Vs MediaTek MT6582M • Vs MediaTek MT6580P • Vs MediaTek MT6580M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 • Vs MediaTek MT6580 • Vs MediaTek MT8735M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 • Vs Atom Z3735F • Vs MediaTek MT8321 • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832 • Vs MediaTek MT8389 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9830A • Vs MediaTek MT6572M • Vs Spreadtrum SC9830 • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SW • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2 • Vs Atom x3-C3200RK • Vs Samsung Exynos 4 Quad 4412 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SE • Vs Spreadtrum SC5735 • Vs MediaTek MT6575
Atom x3-C3130 SoC Comparisons • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731 • Vs Atom x3-C3230RK • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026 • Vs Rockchip RK3126C • Vs MediaTek MT6735M • Vs MediaTek MT6580A • Vs MediaTek MT6580P • Vs MediaTek MT6580M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 • Vs MediaTek MT6580 • Vs MediaTek MT8735M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 • Vs MediaTek MT8321 • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832 • Vs MediaTek MT8382 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228 • Vs MediaTek MT8735B • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A • Vs MediaTek MT8735W • Vs MediaTek MT8732 • Vs Spreadtrum SC8830 • Vs MediaTek MT6582 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215 • Vs MediaTek MT6735P • Vs Spreadtrum SC9850 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210 • Vs MediaTek MT6572 • Vs MediaTek MT6572A • Vs MediaTek MT6570 • Vs MediaTek MT8312 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9830A • Vs MediaTek MT6572M • Vs Spreadtrum SC9830 • Vs MediaTek MT6589 • Vs MediaTek MT8389 • Vs Atom Z3735F • Vs MediaTek MT6582M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212 • Vs MediaTek MT8312CW • Vs MediaTek MT6737H • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SW • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2 • Vs Atom x3-C3200RK • Vs Samsung Exynos 4 Quad 4412 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SE • Vs MediaTek MT8735P • Vs Spreadtrum SC5735 • Vs MediaTek MT6575
| |
|