MediaTek MT6575 vs Intel Atom x3-C3130

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   So, which chip or processor is better? Detailed compare data of benchmarks MediaTek MT6575 vs Intel Atom x3-C3130, speed examination of GPUs Mali-400 MP2 and PowerVR SGX531.
   This performance comparison includes two processors: MT6575 is single-core (ARM Cortex-A9) and Atom x3-C3130 is dual-core (SoFIA). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A careful review of all the technical characteristics of the SoCs, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table.
   From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in software tests like GFXBench, Mozilla Kraken, Quadrant, AnTuTu, 3DMark, PassMark, Neocore, Vellamo, Octane V2, PCMark, GeekBench 6, 5, WebXPRT 3, even the gaming performance of processors in Fortnite, Real Racing 3, PUBG, Minecraft Bedrock, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Sniper 3D, Call of Duty: Mobile, Mortal Kombat etc.
   After looking at the data of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which chip is better to buy MT6575 or Atom x3-C3130 and which chip is better for gaming: Need for Speed No Limits, Asphalt 9, CSR Racing 2, Madout2.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MT6575

Atom x3-C3130

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MT6575

-4%

Atom x3-C3130

26%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MT6575

Atom x3-C3130

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MT6575	Atom x3-C3130
Total score	10235	15909
CPU	2875	4444
GPU	3891	6045
MEM	1627	2544
UX	1834	2873

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MT6575	Atom x3-C3130
Single-Core	27	42
Multi-Core	125	194

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MT6575	Atom x3-C3130
Frequency	1000 MHz	1000 MHz
Cores	1	2
Bit	32	64
Lithography	40 nm	28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	1x1.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A9	2x1.0 GHz SoFIA
Power consumption (TDP)	7 W	7 W
Memory type	LPDDR2	LPDDR2
Max. Memory	0.5 Gb	1 Gb
Memory Frequency	266	800
Memory bandwidth	4	4
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	32 KB	128 KB
L2 cache	1 MB	2 MB
L3 cache	1 MB	8 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Another difference is that MT6575 has 1 more core than Atom x3-C3130. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	PowerVR SGX531	Mali-400 MP2
GPU Frequency	216 MHz	600 MHz
GFloPS	2.24	10.8
# of Cores	1	2
# of Shader Units
Display	840 x 480 pixels	1280 x 800 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	1.8	5.6
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	7.5	13.2
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	3.6	8.1
Call of Duty: Mobile	3.1	7.4
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	5.9	10.6
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	9.1	16.3
Real Racing 3	7.2	12.2
Sniper 3D	5.8	17.8
Need for Speed No Limits	6.5	13
Mortal Kombat X	4.1	9.3
CSR Racing 2	4.7	8.9

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly.
Due to the low performance of the processors, the results of the gaming tests are calculated by analogy with other more powerful CPUs from the site database. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	5 MP	8 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	HD	FullHD
Codec support	H.264	H.264

Networks and Navigation

Modem		A-GOLD 620
Upload speed		6 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6575 is better: 2
The number of parameters for which Intel Atom x3-C3130 is better: 33
You need to know that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of joint testing and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs MT6575 and Atom x3-C3130, as well as read the test results at the links below.

MT6575 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10

• MT6575 specs and review.

Atom x3-C3130 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Atom x3-C3130 specs and review.