Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
Intel Atom x3-C3130 vs MediaTek MT8735W benchmark which processor is better

Intel Atom x3-C3130 vs MediaTek MT8735W

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   Well, which processor or chip is better? Full data of speed tests and benchmarks Intel Atom x3-C3130 vs MediaTek MT8735W, compare of GPUs Mali-T720 MP2 and Mali-400 MP2.
   This performance comparison involves two processors: Atom x3-C3130 is dual-core (SoFIA) and MT8735W is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A53). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A careful review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table.
   From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in software tests like AnTuTu, GeekBench 6, 5, Quadrant, GFXBench, 3DMark, PassMark, WebXPRT 3, PCMark, Mozilla Kraken, Neocore, Octane V2, Vellamo, and how good the processors are in games Real Racing 3, Call of Duty: Mobile, Mortal Kombat, Minecraft Bedrock, Fortnite, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, PUBG, Sniper 3D etc.
   After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which chipset is better to buy Atom x3-C3130 or MT8735W and which chip is better for gaming: CSR Racing 2, Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2, Asphalt 9.

 
Intel Atom x3-C3130
MediaTek MT8735W

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score
Atom x3-C31301% MT8735W1%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)
Atom x3-C313026% MT8735W26%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming
Atom x3-C31301% MT8735W1%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed
Atom x3-C3130 MT8735W
Total score1590923460
CPU44446565
GPU60458914
MEM25443746
UX28734222

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
Atom x3-C3130 MT8735W
Single-Core4262
Multi-Core194286

Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory
Atom x3-C3130 MT8735W
Frequency1000 MHz1300 MHz
Cores24
Bit6464
Lithography28 nm28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration2x1.0 GHz SoFIA4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Power consumption (TDP)7 W7 W
Memory typeLPDDR2LPDDR3
Max. Memory1 Gb4 Gb
Memory Frequency800800
Memory bandwidth44
Neural Processor (NPU)NoNo
L1 cache128 KB32 KB
L2 cache2 MB1 MB
L3 cache8 MB1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)ARMv8-AARMv8-A
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MT8735W is 23% better than Atom x3-C3130 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Atom x3-C3130 has 2 more core than MT8735W. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media
GPUMali-400 MP2Mali-T720 MP2
GPU Frequency600 MHz500 MHz
GFloPS10.817
# of Cores22
# of Shader Units
Display1280 x 800 pixels1280 x 800 pixels
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark
Fortnite Mobile5.65.7
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)13.217.9
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra8.111.7
Call of Duty: Mobile7.410.5
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)10.614.1
Minecraft: Pocket Edition16.322.1
Real Racing 312.214.6
Sniper 3D17.825.7
Need for Speed No Limits1318.7
Mortal Kombat X9.317
CSR Racing 28.915.2
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly.
    Due to the low performance of the processors, the results of the gaming tests are calculated by analogy with other more powerful CPUs from the site database. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.


Cameras
Camera resolution8 MP13 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS3030
Video Encoding resolutionFullHDFullHD
Codec supportH.264H.264


Networks and Navigation
ModemA-GOLD 620
Download speed21 MBit/s.150 MBit/s.
Upload speed6 MBit/s.50 MBit/s.
NavigationGPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC supportNoNo
5G supportYesNo


Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Atom x3-C3130 is better: 4
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT8735W is better: 27
   Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of parallel testing and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips Atom x3-C3130 and MT8735W, as well as read the test results at the links below.
Atom x3-C3130 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
MT8735W SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10


Atom x3-C3130 SoC Comparisons
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731
• Vs Atom x3-C3230RK
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026
• Vs Rockchip RK3126C
• Vs MediaTek MT6735M
• Vs MediaTek MT6580A
• Vs MediaTek MT6580P
• Vs MediaTek MT6580M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016
• Vs MediaTek MT6580
• Vs MediaTek MT8735M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928
• Vs MediaTek MT8321
• Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832
• Vs MediaTek MT8382
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228
• Vs MediaTek MT8735B
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A
• Vs MediaTek MT8732
• Vs Spreadtrum SC8830
• Vs MediaTek MT6582
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215
• Vs MediaTek MT6735P
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9850
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210
• Vs MediaTek MT6572
• Vs MediaTek MT6572A
• Vs MediaTek MT6570
• Vs MediaTek MT8312
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9830A
• Vs MediaTek MT6572M
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9830
• Vs MediaTek MT6589
• Vs MediaTek MT8389
• Vs Atom Z3735F
• Vs MediaTek MT6582M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212
• Vs MediaTek MT8312CW
• Vs Atom Z2520
• Vs MediaTek MT6737H
• Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S1
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SW
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2
• Vs Atom x3-C3200RK
• Vs Samsung Exynos 4 Quad 4412
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SE
• Vs MediaTek MT8735P
• Vs Spreadtrum SC5735
• Vs MediaTek MT6575


MT8735W SoC Comparisons
• Vs MediaTek MT8732
• Vs Spreadtrum SC8830
• Vs MediaTek MT6582
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215
• Vs MediaTek MT6735P
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9850
• Vs MediaTek MT8127
• Vs MediaTek MT6737V
• Vs MediaTek MT8735
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E
• Vs MediaTek MT6737M
• Vs MediaTek MT6732M
• Vs MediaTek MT6735
• Vs MediaTek MT6592M
• Vs MediaTek MT8783
• Vs MediaTek MT6737
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916
• Vs MediaTek MT6592
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974
• Vs MediaTek MT8163
• Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WM
• Vs Qualcomm 205
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WW
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 MSM8920
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A
• Vs MediaTek MT8735B
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E
• Vs MediaTek MT8382
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832
• Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475
• Vs MediaTek MT8321
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928
• Vs MediaTek MT8735M
• Vs MediaTek MT6580
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016
• Vs MediaTek MT6580M
• Vs MediaTek MT6580P
• Vs MediaTek MT6580A
• Vs MediaTek MT6735M
• Vs Rockchip RK3126C
• Vs Atom x3-C3230RK
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210
• Vs MediaTek MT6572
• Vs MediaTek MT6570
• Vs MediaTek MT8312
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026
• Vs MediaTek MT8765B
• Vs MediaTek MT6589
• Vs MediaTek MT8389
• Vs Atom Z3735F
• Vs MediaTek MT6582M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212
• Vs MediaTek MT6737H
• Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470
• Vs MediaTek MT8167D
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S1
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SW
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2
• Vs MediaTek MT6732
• Vs Atom x3-C3200RK
• Vs Samsung Exynos 4 Quad 4412
• Vs MediaTek MT6753T
• Vs MediaTek MT6735T
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SE
• Vs MediaTek MT8735P
• Vs Spreadtrum SC5735
• Vs Unisoc SC7331e
• Vs MediaTek MT8167A
• Vs MediaTek MT6731
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands