 |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX vs AMD EPYC 7702 |
|
Processor comparisons 17-03-2021 If there are difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the comprehensive tests AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX vs AMD EPYC 7702 and see which is better for games or simple use for programming, rendering, machine learning, streaming, video editing. Here you can find useful information from real streaming and video editing tests or different benchmarks. A thorough review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software like UserBenchmark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Prime95, SuperPi, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Handbrake, Furmark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, PassMark, RealBench, PCMark 10, MATLAB, Geekbench 5.2, AIDA64, Gears 5, Blender, 7zip, VeraCrypt, Dolphin Emulator, Blender, WPrime, 3DMark. And how good the processors are in games: - Last Man Standing
- Borderlands 3
- Valorant
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Fortnite
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Apex Legends
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Halo Infinite
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Overwatch
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Fallout 76
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Valheim
- DOOM: Eternal
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Death Stranding
After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7702 or AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | 69% |
EPYC 7702 | 71% | The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7702 is 2% better than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | 66% |
EPYC 7702 | 81% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: Metro Exodus, NBA 2K20, DOTA 2A, Hitman 3, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Battlefield V, Half-Life: Alyx, Forza Horizon 4, League of Legends (LOL), Monster Hunter World, Control, Ghostrunner, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Horizon Zero Dawn.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 116.6 | 143.1 | Valorant | 132.5 | 162.6 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 74.2 | 91.0 | Apex Legends | 124.5 | 152.8 | Call of Duty Warzone | 99.4 | 121.9 | Overwatch | 107.3 | 131.7 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 91.4 | 112.2 | DOOM Eternal | 66.2 | 81.3 | Warzone | 103.3 | 126.8 | Assassin's Creed | 111.3 | 136.6 | Valheim | 110.0 | 134.9 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The tested computers not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | 15% |
EPYC 7702 | 17% | To make a final resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 7702 is more energy efficient than the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX as it consumes less power: 280W vs. 200W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, machine learning, streaming, video rendering or video editing, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the processor includes all cores and threads that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
AMD EPYC 7702 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 209 | 216 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 7575 | 8896 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 509 | 406 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 17768 | 18857 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1244 | 996 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 43450 | 49035 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
AMD EPYC 7702 | Single-Core | 2639 | 2099 | Multi-Core | 63806 | 71929 |
GeekBench 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
AMD EPYC 7702 | Single-Core | 1283 | 1023 | Multi-Core | 28017 | 53995 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. The economy are obvious! It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
AMD EPYC 7702 | Announcement date | July 14, 2020 | April 01, 2020 | Type | Desktop | Server | Socket | sTRX4 | SP3 | Core name | Matisse | Rome | Architecture | Zen 2 | Zen | Generation | 3 | 2 | Turbo Frequency | 4.2 MHz | 3.4 MHz | Frequency | 3.5 MHz | 2 MHz | Cores | 32 | 64 | Threads | 64 | 128 | Bus rate | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 22600 millions | 86000 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 280 W | 200 W | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4 | Max. Memory | | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | | | L1 cache | 2MB | | L2 cache | 16MB | | L3 cache | 128MB | 256MB | Overclocking | No | Yes | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | 100-000000086
| 100-000000038 100-100000038WOF
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is 42% better than EPYC 7702 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7702 has 32 more core than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is better: 11
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7702 is better: 23 Although it should be realized that all the number that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should completely trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of of people who bought AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX and AMD EPYC 7702 before deciding which of the processors to buy for gaming.
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
AMD EPYC 7702 Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
| |
|