Processor comparisons 25-03-2021 Let's say you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a decision after reading the comprehensive tests AMD EPYC 7513 vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX and decide which is better for games or simple use for machine learning, streaming, programming, video editing, rendering. Here you can find all information from real streaming and video editing tests or different benchmarks. A thorough review of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications like Geekbench 5.2, Blender, RealBench, Dolphin Emulator, Handbrake, AIDA64, PCMark 10, 3DMark, MATLAB, VeraCrypt, DaVinci Resolve Studio, UserBenchmark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), 7zip, Prime95, PassMark, Gears 5, Furmark, Blender, SuperPi, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, WPrime. And how good the processors are in games: - Death Stranding
- Grand Theft Auto V
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Overwatch
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Fortnite
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- DOOM: Eternal
- Valorant
- Halo Infinite
- Apex Legends
- Valheim
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Borderlands 3
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Fallout 76
- Last Man Standing
After looking at the data of parallel benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX or AMD EPYC 7513.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
EPYC 7513 | 75% |
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | 79% | This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is 5% better than EPYC 7513. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.EPYC 7513 | 75% |
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | 74% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of less popular games in which processors were compared: PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), League of Legends (LOL), Half-Life: Alyx, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Hitman 3, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Metro Exodus, DOTA 2A, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Control, Battlefield V, Ghostrunner, Horizon Zero Dawn, Forza Horizon 4, Monster Hunter World, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), NBA 2K20.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 133.5 | 131.3 | Valorant | 151.7 | 149.2 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 85.0 | 83.6 | Apex Legends | 142.6 | 140.3 | Call of Duty Warzone | 113.8 | 111.9 | Overwatch | 122.9 | 120.9 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 104.7 | 103.0 | DOOM Eternal | 75.9 | 74.6 | Warzone | 118.4 | 116.4 | Assassin's Creed | 127.5 | 125.3 | Valheim | 125.9 | 123.8 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
EPYC 7513 | 23% |
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | 15% | To make a finishing decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 7513 is more energy efficient than the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX as it consumes less power: 200W vs. 280W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, video rendering or video editing, machine learning, streaming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor turns on all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum performance. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 7513 |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 162 | 209 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 6680 | 7575 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 304 | 509 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 14158 | 17768 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 748 | 1244 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 36818 | 43450 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7513 |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | Single-Core | 1576 | 2639 | Multi-Core | 54007 | 63806 |
GeekBench 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7513 |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | Single-Core | 1403 | 1283 | Multi-Core | 29463 | 28017 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. The economy are obvious! It turns out that you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD EPYC 7513 |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | Announcement date | March 15, 2021 | July 14, 2020 | Type | Server | Desktop | Socket | SP3 | sTRX4 | Core name | Milan | Matisse | Architecture | Zen 3 | Zen 2 | Generation | 3 | 3 | Turbo Frequency | 3.65 MHz | 4.2 MHz | Frequency | 2.6 MHz | 3.5 MHz | Cores | 32 | 32 | Threads | 64 | 64 | Bus rate | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 68000 millions | 22600 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 200 W | 280 W | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4 | Max. Memory | | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 3200 | Memory bandwidth | 204.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | | 2MB | L2 cache | | 16MB | L3 cache | 128MB | 128MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | 100-000000334 100-100000334WOF
| 100-000000086
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is 25% better than EPYC 7513 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7513 is better: 17
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is better: 12 Although it should be understood that all the number in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the opinion of of people who bought AMD EPYC 7513 and AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX before making a selection which processor to buy for gaming and which not. • Cinebench r15 score • Cinebench r20 score • Cinebench r23 score • GeekBench 5 score
Versus Battle of the Processors • Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Core i9-13900K Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
• Cinebench r15 score • Cinebench r20 score • Cinebench r23 score • GeekBench 5 score • Fortnite gaming benchmark • Roblox gaming benchmark • Valorant gaming benchmark • Cyberpunk 2077 gaming benchmark • Apex Legends gaming benchmark • Call of Duty: Warzone gaming benchmark • Overwatch gaming benchmark • Red Dead Redemption 2 gaming benchmark • DOOM Eternal gaming benchmark • Assassin's Creed gaming benchmark • GTA 5 gaming benchmark • PUBG gaming benchmark
Versus Battle of the Processors • Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Core i9-13900K Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs EPYC 7702 • EPYC 7742 Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Core i9-12900K Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Core i9-12900HK Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Core i9-12900H Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Ryzen Threadripper 3960X Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
|