Processor comparisons 25-03-2021 Let's say you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a choice after reading the comprehensive tests AMD EPYC 7443 vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX and decide which is better for games or simple use for machine learning, video editing, programming, rendering, streaming. Here is all information from various benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A careful review of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests such as Furmark, 7zip, Dolphin Emulator, Geekbench 5.2, UserBenchmark, 3DMark, MATLAB, PassMark, RealBench, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, VeraCrypt, Blender, PCMark 10, AIDA64, SuperPi, Blender, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), WPrime, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Handbrake, Prime95, Gears 5. And how good the CPUs are in games: - Borderlands 3
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Death Stranding
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Fallout 76
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Fortnite
- Overwatch
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Last Man Standing
- DOOM: Eternal
- Apex Legends
- Valheim
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Halo Infinite
- Valorant
After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX or AMD EPYC 7443.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
EPYC 7443 | 72% |
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | 79% | This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is 8% better than EPYC 7443. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.EPYC 7443 | 71% |
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | 74% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Monster Hunter World, Hitman 3, Half-Life: Alyx, DOTA 2A, Forza Horizon 4, Battlefield V, League of Legends (LOL), Microsoft Flight Simulator, Metro Exodus, Control, NBA 2K20, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Horizon Zero Dawn, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Ghostrunner.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 126.4 | 131.3 | Valorant | 143.6 | 149.2 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 80.4 | 83.6 | Apex Legends | 135.0 | 140.3 | Call of Duty Warzone | 107.7 | 111.9 | Overwatch | 116.4 | 120.9 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 99.1 | 103.0 | DOOM Eternal | 71.8 | 74.6 | Warzone | 112.0 | 116.4 | Assassin's Creed | 120.7 | 125.3 | Valheim | 119.2 | 123.8 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
EPYC 7443 | 22% |
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | 15% | To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 7443 is more energy efficient than the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX since it has less power consumption: 200W vs. 280W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, video rendering or video editing, programming, machine learning, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor turns on all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to reach maximum efficiency. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 7443 |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 147 | 209 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 6075 | 7575 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 276 | 509 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 12876 | 17768 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 680 | 1244 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 33481 | 43450 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7443 |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | Single-Core | 1530 | 2639 | Multi-Core | 49112 | 63806 |
GeekBench 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7443 |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | Single-Core | 1354 | 1283 | Multi-Core | 24852 | 28017 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| AMD EPYC 7443 |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | Announcement date | March 15, 2021 | July 14, 2020 | Type | Server | Desktop | Socket | SP3 | sTRX4 | Core name | Milan | Matisse | Architecture | Zen 3 | Zen 2 | Generation | 3 | 3 | Turbo Frequency | 4 MHz | 4.2 MHz | Frequency | 2.85 MHz | 3.5 MHz | Cores | 24 | 32 | Threads | 48 | 64 | Bus rate | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 62000 millions | 22600 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 200 W | 280 W | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4 | Max. Memory | | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 3200 | Memory bandwidth | 204.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | | 2MB | L2 cache | | 16MB | L3 cache | 128MB | 128MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | 100-000000342 100-100000342WOF
| 100-000000086
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is 18% better than EPYC 7443 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX has 8 more core than EPYC 7443. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7443 is better: 5
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is better: 26 However, it should be understood that all the figures in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the opinion of real owners of AMD EPYC 7443 and AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX before making a selection which of the processors to buy for gaming. • Cinebench r15 score • Cinebench r20 score • Cinebench r23 score • GeekBench 5 score
Versus Battle of the Processors • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Core i9-13900K Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs EPYC 7663
• Cinebench r15 score • Cinebench r20 score • Cinebench r23 score • GeekBench 5 score • Fortnite gaming benchmark • Roblox gaming benchmark • Valorant gaming benchmark • Cyberpunk 2077 gaming benchmark • Apex Legends gaming benchmark • Call of Duty: Warzone gaming benchmark • Overwatch gaming benchmark • Red Dead Redemption 2 gaming benchmark • DOOM Eternal gaming benchmark • Assassin's Creed gaming benchmark • GTA 5 gaming benchmark • PUBG gaming benchmark
Versus Battle of the Processors • Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Core i9-13900K Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs EPYC 7702 • EPYC 7742 Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Core i9-12900K Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Core i9-12900HK Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Core i9-12900H Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Ryzen Threadripper 3960X Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
|