Processor comparisons 09-06-2022 If you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a choice after reading the full tests AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs AMD EPYC 7702 and see which is better for games or normal use for rendering, machine learning, programming, video editing, streaming. Here you can find all information from real streaming and video editing tests or various benchmarks. A thorough analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software like VeraCrypt, Handbrake, Blender, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Furmark, WPrime, Dolphin Emulator, Geekbench 5.2, UserBenchmark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Blender, 3DMark, PassMark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), MATLAB, Gears 5, Prime95, AIDA64, 7zip, RealBench, SuperPi, PCMark 10. And how good the processors are in games: - Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Overwatch
- Fortnite
- Valheim
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Death Stranding
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Fallout 76
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Borderlands 3
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Valorant
- DOOM: Eternal
- Halo Infinite
- Apex Legends
- Last Man Standing
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
After looking at the data of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7702 or AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX | 99% |
EPYC 7702 | 83% | The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX is 16% better than EPYC 7702. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX | 88% |
EPYC 7702 | 97% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: DOTA 2A, NBA 2K20, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Hitman 3, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Metro Exodus, Horizon Zero Dawn, Half-Life: Alyx, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Forza Horizon 4, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Monster Hunter World, Control, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Battlefield V, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Ghostrunner, League of Legends (LOL).
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 155.4 | 171.4 | Valorant | 176.6 | 194.8 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 98.9 | 109.1 | Apex Legends | 166.0 | 183.1 | Call of Duty Warzone | 132.4 | 146.1 | Overwatch | 143.0 | 157.8 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 121.8 | 134.4 | DOOM Eternal | 88.3 | 97.4 | Warzone | 137.7 | 152.0 | Assassin's Creed | 148.3 | 163.7 | Valheim | 146.5 | 161.7 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX | 18% |
EPYC 7702 | 17% | To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7702 as it consumes less power: 280W vs. 200W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, programming, video editing or video rendering, machine learning, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU turns on all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to reach maximum performance. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX |
AMD EPYC 7702 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 257 | 216 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 13822 | 8896 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 567 | 406 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 29345 | 18857 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1472 | 996 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 87840 | 49035 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX |
AMD EPYC 7702 | Single-Core | 3223 | 2099 | Multi-Core | 106970 | 71929 |
GeekBench 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX |
AMD EPYC 7702 | Single-Core | 1516 | 1023 | Multi-Core | 43596 | 53995 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. The economy are obvious! It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX |
AMD EPYC 7702 | Announcement date | March 08, 2022 | April 01, 2020 | Type | Desktop | Server | Socket | sWRX8 | SP3 | Core name | Chagall PRO | Naples | Architecture | Zen 3 | Zen | Generation | 3 | 2 | Turbo Frequency | 4.5 MHz | 3.4 MHz | Frequency | 2.7 MHz | 2 MHz | Cores | 64 | 64 | Threads | 128 | 128 | Bus rate | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 22600 millions | 86000 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 280 W | 200 W | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4 | Max. Memory | | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | | | L1 cache | 4MB | | L2 cache | 32MB | | L3 cache | 256MB | 256MB | Overclocking | No | Yes | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | 100-000000444 | 100-000000038 100-100000038WOF
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX is 25% better than EPYC 7702 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX is better: 16
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7702 is better: 15 Although it should be understood that the summary data in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of real owners of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX and AMD EPYC 7702 before making a selection which processor to buy for gaming and which not. • Cinebench r15 score • Cinebench r20 score • Cinebench r23 score • GeekBench 5 score
Versus Battle of the Processors • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs EPYC 7663
• Cinebench r15 score • Cinebench r20 score • Cinebench r23 score • GeekBench 5 score • Fortnite gaming benchmark • Roblox gaming benchmark • Valorant gaming benchmark • Cyberpunk 2077 gaming benchmark • Apex Legends gaming benchmark • Call of Duty: Warzone gaming benchmark • Overwatch gaming benchmark • Red Dead Redemption 2 gaming benchmark • DOOM Eternal gaming benchmark • Assassin's Creed gaming benchmark • GTA 5 gaming benchmark • PUBG gaming benchmark
Versus Battle of the Processors • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Core i9-13900K Vs EPYC 7702 • EPYC 7742 Vs EPYC 7702 • Ryzen Threadripper 3970X Vs EPYC 7702 • Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX Vs EPYC 7702 • Core i9-12900K Vs EPYC 7702 • Core i9-12900H Vs EPYC 7702 • Ryzen Threadripper 3960X Vs EPYC 7702 • Core i9-12900KF Vs EPYC 7702 • EPYC 7513 Vs EPYC 7702
|