Processor comparisons 17-03-2021 You may have difficulties with the choice of a CPU, you will solve them by reading the full tests AMD EPYC 7702 vs AMD Ryzen 9 3900X and decide which is better for games or simple use for video editing, machine learning, streaming, rendering, programming. Here is all information from real streaming and video editing tests or various benchmarks. A thorough review of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications like PassMark, Blender, PCMark 10, SuperPi, Handbrake, 3DMark, Geekbench 5.2, Blender, WPrime, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Furmark, Dolphin Emulator, Prime95, 7zip, RealBench, MATLAB, AIDA64, Gears 5, UserBenchmark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), VeraCrypt. And how good the processors are in games: - Rainbow Six Siege
- Valorant
- Apex Legends
- Overwatch
- Watch Dogs Legion
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Valheim
- Fallout 76
- Fortnite
- Death Stranding
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- DOOM: Eternal
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Halo Infinite
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Last Man Standing
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Borderlands 3
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD Ryzen 9 3900X or AMD EPYC 7702.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
EPYC 7702 | 83% |
Ryzen 9 3900X | 65% | This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7702 is 21% better than Ryzen 9 3900X. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.EPYC 7702 | 97% |
Ryzen 9 3900X | 61% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of less popular games in which CPU comparisons were performed: League of Legends (LOL), Metro Exodus, Control, NBA 2K20, Horizon Zero Dawn, Monster Hunter World, Battlefield V, DOTA 2A, Ghostrunner, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Hitman 3, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Forza Horizon 4, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Half-Life: Alyx.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 171.4 | 108.5 | Valorant | 194.8 | 123.3 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 109.1 | 69.0 | Apex Legends | 183.1 | 115.9 | Call of Duty Warzone | 146.1 | 92.5 | Overwatch | 157.8 | 99.9 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 134.4 | 85.1 | DOOM Eternal | 97.4 | 61.7 | Warzone | 152.0 | 96.2 | Assassin's Creed | 163.7 | 103.6 | Valheim | 161.7 | 102.3 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
EPYC 7702 | 17% |
Ryzen 9 3900X | 42% | To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Ryzen 9 3900X is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7702 as it consumes less power: 200W vs. 105W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, streaming, video rendering or video editing, programming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor turns on all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum efficiency. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 7702 |
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 216 | 214 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 8896 | 3168 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 406 | 521 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 18857 | 7178 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 996 | 1342 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 49035 | 18424 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7702 |
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X | Single-Core | 2099 | 2758 | Multi-Core | 71929 | 32949 |
GeekBench 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7702 |
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X | Single-Core | 1023 | 1335 | Multi-Core | 53995 | 13268 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in new games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD EPYC 7702 |
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X | Announcement date | April 01, 2020 | July 07, 2019 | Type | Server | Desktop | Socket | SP3 | AM4 | Core name | Naples | Matisse | Architecture | Zen | Zen 2 | Generation | 2 | 3 | Turbo Frequency | 3.4 MHz | 4.6 MHz | Frequency | 2 MHz | 3.8 MHz | Cores | 64 | 12 | Threads | 128 | 24 | Bus rate | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 86000 millions | 7800 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 200 W | 105 W | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4 | Max. Memory | | | Memory Frequency | | 3200 | Memory bandwidth | | | L1 cache | | 768KB | L2 cache | | 6MB | L3 cache | 256MB | 64MB | Overclocking | Yes | Yes | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | 100-000000038 100-100000038WOF
| 100-000000023 100-100000023BOX 100-100000023MPK
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Ryzen 9 3900X is 47% better than EPYC 7702 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7702 has 52 more core than Ryzen 9 3900X. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7702 is better: 21
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 9 3900X is better: 12 Although it should be realized that all the figures in the article above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of of people who bought AMD EPYC 7702 and AMD Ryzen 9 3900X before deciding which of the processors to buy for gaming. • Cinebench r15 score • Cinebench r20 score • Cinebench r23 score • GeekBench 5 score • Fortnite gaming benchmark • Roblox gaming benchmark • Valorant gaming benchmark • Cyberpunk 2077 gaming benchmark • Apex Legends gaming benchmark • Call of Duty: Warzone gaming benchmark • Overwatch gaming benchmark • Red Dead Redemption 2 gaming benchmark • DOOM Eternal gaming benchmark • Assassin's Creed gaming benchmark • GTA 5 gaming benchmark • PUBG gaming benchmark
Versus Battle of the Processors • Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Core i9-13900K Vs EPYC 7702 • EPYC 7742 Vs EPYC 7702 • Ryzen Threadripper 3970X Vs EPYC 7702 • Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX Vs EPYC 7702 • Core i9-12900K Vs EPYC 7702 • Core i9-12900H Vs EPYC 7702 • Ryzen Threadripper 3960X Vs EPYC 7702 • Core i9-12900KF Vs EPYC 7702
• Cinebench r23 score • Cinebench r20 score • Cinebench r15 score • GeekBench 5 score • DOOM Eternal gaming benchmark • Apex Legends gaming benchmark • Valorant gaming benchmark • Call of Duty: Warzone gaming benchmark • Fortnite gaming benchmark • GTA 5 gaming benchmark • Roblox gaming benchmark • PUBG gaming benchmark • Overwatch gaming benchmark • Cyberpunk 2077 gaming benchmark • Red Dead Redemption 2 gaming benchmark • Assassin's Creed gaming benchmark
Versus Battle of the Processors • Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Ryzen Threadripper 3990X Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Core i9-13900K Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • EPYC 7763 Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • EPYC 7713P Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • EPYC 75F3 Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • EPYC 7713 Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • EPYC 7742 Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Ryzen Threadripper 3970X Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • EPYC 7663 Vs Ryzen 9 3900X
|