Processor comparisons 25-03-2021 If you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a choice by looking at the AMD EPYC 7413 vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX tests and decide which is better for games or simple use for programming, streaming, rendering, video editing, machine learning. Here you can find all information from real streaming and video editing tests or different benchmarks. A careful review of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software such as UserBenchmark, MATLAB, VeraCrypt, DaVinci Resolve Studio, PassMark, PCMark 10, Prime95, RealBench, SuperPi, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Geekbench 5.2, Blender, WPrime, 7zip, Furmark, Gears 5, Blender, AIDA64, Dolphin Emulator, Handbrake, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, 3DMark. And how good the CPUs are in games: - Red Dead Redemption 2
- DOOM: Eternal
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Fallout 76
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Last Man Standing
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Apex Legends
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Valorant
- Valheim
- Overwatch
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Halo Infinite
- Fortnite
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Borderlands 3
- Death Stranding
After looking at the data of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX or AMD EPYC 7413.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
EPYC 7413 | 75% |
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | 85% | The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is 11% better than EPYC 7413. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.EPYC 7413 | 70% |
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | 74% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Monster Hunter World, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Horizon Zero Dawn, DOTA 2A, Hitman 3, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Half-Life: Alyx, Metro Exodus, NBA 2K20, League of Legends (LOL), Battlefield V, Ghostrunner, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Forza Horizon 4, Microsoft Flight Simulator, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Control.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 123.8 | 131.3 | Valorant | 140.6 | 149.2 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 78.8 | 83.6 | Apex Legends | 132.2 | 140.3 | Call of Duty Warzone | 105.5 | 111.9 | Overwatch | 113.9 | 120.9 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 97.0 | 103.0 | DOOM Eternal | 70.3 | 74.6 | Warzone | 109.7 | 116.4 | Assassin's Creed | 118.1 | 125.3 | Valheim | 116.7 | 123.8 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
EPYC 7413 | 23% |
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | 15% | To make a final resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 7413 is more energy efficient than the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX since it has less power consumption: 180W vs. 280W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, machine learning, streaming, video editing or video rendering, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor uses all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum performance. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 7413 |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 137 | 209 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 5657 | 7575 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 257 | 509 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 11990 | 17768 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 634 | 1244 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 31178 | 43450 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7413 |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | Single-Core | 1425 | 2639 | Multi-Core | 45733 | 63806 |
GeekBench 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7413 |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | Single-Core | 1260 | 1283 | Multi-Core | 23142 | 28017 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in new games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| AMD EPYC 7413 |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | Announcement date | March 15, 2021 | July 14, 2020 | Type | Server | Desktop | Socket | SP3 | sTRX4 | Core name | Milan | Matisse | Architecture | Zen 3 | Zen 2 | Generation | 3 | 3 | Turbo Frequency | 3.6 MHz | 4.2 MHz | Frequency | 2.65 MHz | 3.5 MHz | Cores | 24 | 32 | Threads | 48 | 64 | Bus rate | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 62000 millions | 22600 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 180 W | 280 W | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4 | Max. Memory | | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 3200 | Memory bandwidth | 204.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | | 2MB | L2 cache | | 16MB | L3 cache | 128MB | 128MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | 100-000000323 100-100000323WOF
| 100-000000086
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is 24% better than EPYC 7413 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX has 8 more core than EPYC 7413. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7413 is better: 4
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is better: 27 Although it should be understood that all the number in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should totally trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of of people who bought AMD EPYC 7413 and AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX before making a choice which of the processors to buy for gaming. • Cinebench r15 score • Cinebench r20 score • Cinebench r23 score • GeekBench 5 score
Versus Battle of the Processors • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Core i9-13900K Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs EPYC 7663
• Cinebench r15 score • Cinebench r20 score • Cinebench r23 score • GeekBench 5 score • Fortnite gaming benchmark • Roblox gaming benchmark • Valorant gaming benchmark • Cyberpunk 2077 gaming benchmark • Apex Legends gaming benchmark • Call of Duty: Warzone gaming benchmark • Overwatch gaming benchmark • Red Dead Redemption 2 gaming benchmark • DOOM Eternal gaming benchmark • Assassin's Creed gaming benchmark • GTA 5 gaming benchmark • PUBG gaming benchmark
Versus Battle of the Processors • Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Core i9-13900K Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs EPYC 7702 • EPYC 7742 Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Core i9-12900K Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Core i9-12900HK Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Core i9-12900H Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Ryzen Threadripper 3960X Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Core i9-12900KF Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
|