|
AMD EPYC 9124 vs AMD EPYC 7702 |
|
Processor comparisons 11-03-2023 Let's say you have difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the full tests AMD EPYC 9124 vs AMD EPYC 7702 and understand which is better for games or normal use for video editing, streaming, rendering, machine learning, programming. Here is useful information from many benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A thorough review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software like WPrime, SuperPi, Blender, Furmark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, PassMark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Handbrake, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Gears 5, VeraCrypt, 7zip, Prime95, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Dolphin Emulator, MATLAB, Blender, UserBenchmark, AIDA64, RealBench, 3DMark, PCMark 10. Gaming performance of processors in: - Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Overwatch
- DOOM: Eternal
- Valheim
- Apex Legends
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Fallout 76
- Death Stranding
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Borderlands 3
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Fortnite
- Halo Infinite
- Last Man Standing
- Valorant
After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7702 or AMD EPYC 9124.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
EPYC 9124 | 62% |
EPYC 7702 | 71% | This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7702 is 12% better than EPYC 9124. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.EPYC 9124 | 64% |
EPYC 7702 | 81% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Battlefield V, Horizon Zero Dawn, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Control, Forza Horizon 4, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Hitman 3, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), League of Legends (LOL), Microsoft Flight Simulator, Ghostrunner, DOTA 2A, Half-Life: Alyx, NBA 2K20, Metro Exodus, Monster Hunter World.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 112.7 | 143.1 | Valorant | 128.0 | 162.6 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 71.7 | 91.0 | Apex Legends | 120.3 | 152.8 | Call of Duty Warzone | 96.0 | 121.9 | Overwatch | 103.7 | 131.7 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 88.3 | 112.2 | DOOM Eternal | 64.0 | 81.3 | Warzone | 99.9 | 126.8 | Assassin's Creed | 107.5 | 136.6 | Valheim | 106.3 | 134.9 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The tested computers not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
EPYC 9124 | 20% |
EPYC 7702 | 17% | To make a finishing decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 9124 is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7702 since it has less power consumption: 200W vs. 200W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, video editing or video rendering, streaming, machine learning, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor includes all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum performance. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 9124 |
AMD EPYC 7702 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 110 | 216 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 5178 | 8896 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 220 | 406 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 10991 | 18857 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 566 | 996 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 28606 | 49035 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 9124 |
AMD EPYC 7702 | Single-Core | 1293 | 2099 | Multi-Core | 41968 | 71929 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 9124 |
AMD EPYC 7702 | Single-Core | 1206 | 1023 | Multi-Core | 24169 | 53995 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| AMD EPYC 9124 |
AMD EPYC 7702 | Announcement date | November 10, 2022 | April 01, 2020 | Type | Server | Server | Socket | SP5 | SP3 | Core name | Genoa | Rome | Architecture | Zen 4 | Zen | Generation | 4 | 2 | Turbo Frequency | 3.7 MHz | 3.4 MHz | Frequency | 3 MHz | 2 MHz | Cores | 16 | 64 | Threads | 32 | 128 | Bus rate | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 5 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 64000 millions | 86000 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 200 W | 200 W | Memory type | DDR5 | DDR4 | Max. Memory | 4096 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 4800 | | Memory bandwidth | 204.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 64MB | 256MB | Overclocking | No | Yes | Supports ECC | Yes | No | Part number | 100-000000802 100-100000802WOF | 100-000000038 100-100000038WOF
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 9124 is 33% better than EPYC 7702 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7702 has 48 more core than EPYC 9124. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9124 is better: 11
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7702 is better: 24 Although it should be understood that the summary data in the text above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of of people who bought AMD EPYC 9124 and AMD EPYC 7702 before making a choice which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD EPYC 9124 Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 7702 Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
| |
|