Processor comparisons 25-03-2021 Perhaps you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a decision after reading the full tests AMD EPYC 7313P vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX and understand which is better for games or normal use for machine learning, streaming, video editing, programming, rendering. Here is all information from different benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A careful review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like SuperPi, UserBenchmark, Handbrake, Furmark, 3DMark, Blender, 7zip, Dolphin Emulator, DaVinci Resolve Studio, MATLAB, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Gears 5, VeraCrypt, RealBench, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), WPrime, Prime95, Geekbench 5.2, Blender, PCMark 10, AIDA64, PassMark. Gaming performance of processors in: - Rainbow Six Siege
- Halo Infinite
- Fortnite
- Last Man Standing
- Apex Legends
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Valheim
- DOOM: Eternal
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Borderlands 3
- Valorant
- Fallout 76
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Death Stranding
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Cyberpunk 2077
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Overwatch
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX or AMD EPYC 7313P.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
EPYC 7313P | 67% |
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | 79% | This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is 15% better than EPYC 7313P. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.EPYC 7313P | 67% |
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | 74% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of less popular games in which processors were compared: League of Legends (LOL), Hitman 3, Forza Horizon 4, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Control, DOTA 2A, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Monster Hunter World, Horizon Zero Dawn, Half-Life: Alyx, Metro Exodus, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Battlefield V, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Ghostrunner, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, NBA 2K20.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 118.0 | 131.3 | Valorant | 134.1 | 149.2 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 75.1 | 83.6 | Apex Legends | 126.0 | 140.3 | Call of Duty Warzone | 100.6 | 111.9 | Overwatch | 108.6 | 120.9 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 92.5 | 103.0 | DOOM Eternal | 67.0 | 74.6 | Warzone | 104.6 | 116.4 | Assassin's Creed | 112.6 | 125.3 | Valheim | 111.3 | 123.8 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The tested computers not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
EPYC 7313P | 23% |
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | 15% | To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 7313P is more energy efficient than the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX as it consumes less power: 155W vs. 280W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, programming, machine learning, video editing or video rendering, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum efficiency, the processor includes all cores and threads that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 7313P |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 116 | 209 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 4742 | 7575 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 215 | 509 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 10051 | 17768 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 531 | 1244 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 26137 | 43450 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7313P |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | Single-Core | 1195 | 2639 | Multi-Core | 38338 | 63806 |
GeekBench 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7313P |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | Single-Core | 1107 | 1283 | Multi-Core | 19400 | 28017 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| AMD EPYC 7313P |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | Announcement date | March 15, 2021 | July 14, 2020 | Type | Server | Desktop | Socket | SP3 | sTRX4 | Core name | Milan | Matisse | Architecture | Zen 3 | Zen 2 | Generation | 3 | 3 | Turbo Frequency | 3.7 MHz | 4.2 MHz | Frequency | 3 MHz | 3.5 MHz | Cores | 16 | 32 | Threads | 32 | 64 | Bus rate | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 54000 millions | 22600 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 155 W | 280 W | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4 | Max. Memory | | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 3200 | Memory bandwidth | 204.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | | 2MB | L2 cache | | 16MB | L3 cache | 128MB | 128MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | 100-000000339 100-100000339WOF
| 100-000000086
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is 14% better than EPYC 7313P in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX has 16 more core than EPYC 7313P. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7313P is better: 4
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is better: 27 However, it should be understood that the summary data in the table above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of of people who bought AMD EPYC 7313P and AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX before making a selection which of the CPUs to buy for gaming. • Cinebench r15 score • Cinebench r20 score • Cinebench r23 score • GeekBench 5 score
Versus Battle of the Processors • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Core i9-12900K Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 7643
• Cinebench r15 score • Cinebench r20 score • Cinebench r23 score • GeekBench 5 score • Fortnite gaming benchmark • Roblox gaming benchmark • Valorant gaming benchmark • Cyberpunk 2077 gaming benchmark • Apex Legends gaming benchmark • Call of Duty: Warzone gaming benchmark • Overwatch gaming benchmark • Red Dead Redemption 2 gaming benchmark • DOOM Eternal gaming benchmark • Assassin's Creed gaming benchmark • GTA 5 gaming benchmark • PUBG gaming benchmark
Versus Battle of the Processors • Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Core i9-13900K Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs EPYC 7702 • EPYC 7742 Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Core i9-12900K Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Core i9-12900HK Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Core i9-12900H Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Ryzen Threadripper 3960X Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
|