 |
Apple M2 vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
|
Processor comparisons 20-10-2022 Perhaps you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a choice by looking at the Apple M2 vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX tests and understand which is better for games or normal use for rendering, video editing, streaming, machine learning, programming. Here is all information from real video editing and streaming tests or several benchmarks. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications such as AIDA64, Blender, UserBenchmark, 3DMark, Blender, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Handbrake, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Prime95, 7zip, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), MATLAB, VeraCrypt, Gears 5, Dolphin Emulator, PCMark 10, WPrime, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, PassMark, Furmark, SuperPi, RealBench. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Last Man Standing
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Overwatch
- Halo Infinite
- Borderlands 3
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Valheim
- Death Stranding
- DOOM: Eternal
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Valorant
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Apex Legends
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Fortnite
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Fallout 76
After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX or Apple M2.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
M2 | 59% |
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | 69% | The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is 14% better than M2. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.M2 | 55% |
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | 66% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of less popular games in which processors were compared: NBA 2K20, DOTA 2A, Metro Exodus, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Microsoft Flight Simulator, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Forza Horizon 4, Control, Horizon Zero Dawn, Half-Life: Alyx, Battlefield V, Hitman 3, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Monster Hunter World, Ghostrunner, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, League of Legends (LOL).
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 97.4 | 116.6 | Valorant | 110.7 | 132.5 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 62.0 | 74.2 | Apex Legends | 104.1 | 124.5 | Call of Duty Warzone | 83.0 | 99.4 | Overwatch | 89.7 | 107.3 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 76.4 | 91.4 | DOOM Eternal | 55.4 | 66.2 | Warzone | 86.4 | 103.3 | Assassin's Creed | 93.0 | 111.3 | Valheim | 91.9 | 110.0 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
M2 | 535% |
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | 15% | To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the M2 is more energy efficient than the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX as it consumes less power: 12W vs. 280W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, programming, video rendering or video editing, machine learning, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the CPU includes all threads and cores that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Apple M2 |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 298 | 209 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 1586 | 7575 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 558 | 509 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 2699 | 17768 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 2057 | 1244 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 10520 | 43450 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Apple M2 |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | Single-Core | 4095 | 2639 | Multi-Core | 29665 | 63806 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Apple M2 |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | Single-Core | 1929 | 1283 | Multi-Core | 9243 | 28017 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Apple M2 |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | Announcement date | October 18, 2022 | July 14, 2020 | Type | Laptop | Desktop | Socket | M2 | sTRX4 | Core name | 4 x Avalanche and 4 x Blizzard | Matisse | Architecture | hybrid (big.LITTLE) | Zen 2 | Generation | 2 | 3 | Turbo Frequency | | 4.2 MHz | Frequency | 3.49 MHz | 3.5 MHz | Cores | 8 | 32 | Threads | 8 | 64 | Bus rate | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 5 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 20000 millions | 22600 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 12 W | 280 W | Memory type | LPDDR5 - Up to 6400MHz | DDR4 | Max. Memory | | | Memory Frequency | 2400 | 3200 | Memory bandwidth | | | L1 cache | 2MB | 2MB | L2 cache | 12MB | 16MB | L3 cache | 16MB | 128MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | | 100-000000086
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is 0% better than M2 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX has 24 more core than M2. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Apple M2 is better: 9
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is better: 24 Although it should be understood that all the figures in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of real owners of Apple M2 and AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX before deciding which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Apple M2 Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i7-12700TE • Vs Core i7-12700HE • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Core i7-12700E • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Core i7-12700HL • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Core i7-12800HL • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Xeon W-2275 • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS • Vs Core i9-9940X • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Core i5-12600HE • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen 5 6600H • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i5-12600HX • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U • Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Ryzen 7 6800U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Ryzen 5 6600U • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Core i7-1280P • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Core i5-12450HX • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Ryzen 7 5825U • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Core i3-12300 • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Core i5-12500T • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 9 4900H • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Core i9-10900X • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Core i5-1240P • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G • Vs Core i5-11500H • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U • Vs Core i3-12300T • Vs Core i7-1270P • Vs Ryzen 7 4800U • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Core i5-1250P • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Core i3-12100T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 • Vs Core i7-1260P • Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Core i5-1155G7 • Vs Core i7-10700KF • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i9-13700HK • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Core i7-1360P • Vs Core i5-1350P • Vs Core i5-1340P • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-1345U • Vs Core i5-1335U • Vs Core i5-1334U • Vs Core i5-13420H • Vs Core i5-13450HX • Vs Core i7-1355U • Vs Core i7-1365U • Vs Core i3-1315U • Vs Core i3-1305U • Vs Core i7-13620H • Vs Core i7-13650HX • Vs Core i7-13705H • Vs Core i3-N305 • Vs Core i3-N300 • Vs Core i7-8650U • Vs Ryzen 7 3750H • Vs Core i9-9880H • Vs Ryzen 5 5625C • Vs Ryzen 7 5825C • Vs Ryzen 3 5425C • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Ryzen 9 7945HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7845HX • Vs Ryzen 7 7745HX • Vs Ryzen 5 7645HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7940HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7840HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7736U • Vs Ryzen 7 7735U • Vs Ryzen 5 7535U • Vs Ryzen 3 7335U • Vs Ryzen 7 7730U • Vs Ryzen 5 7530U • Vs Ryzen 3 7330U • Vs Ryzen 5 7520U • Vs Ryzen 3 7320U • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
| |
|