 |
AMD EPYC 7773X vs AMD EPYC 7702 |
|
Processor comparisons 20-04-2023
If you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a choice by looking at the AMD EPYC 7773X vs AMD EPYC 7702 tests and decide which is better for games or simple use for programming, streaming, video editing, rendering, machine learning. Here is all information from real video editing and streaming tests or various benchmarks. A thorough review of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software such as PassMark, VeraCrypt, Dolphin Emulator, UserBenchmark, SuperPi, Handbrake, RealBench, Gears 5, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), PCMark 10, Prime95, WPrime, AIDA64, Blender, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Blender, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, 7zip, MATLAB, 3DMark, Furmark.
And how good the CPUs are in games: - Red Dead Redemption 2
- Cyberpunk 2077
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Valheim
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Borderlands 3
- Overwatch
- Last Man Standing
- DOOM: Eternal
- Halo Infinite
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Fortnite
- Death Stranding
- Fallout 76
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Valorant
- Apex Legends
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7702 or AMD EPYC 7773X.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| EPYC 7773X | 74% |
EPYC 7702 | 71% |
This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7773X is 4% better than EPYC 7702. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| EPYC 7773X | 80% |
EPYC 7702 | 81% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Metro Exodus, Control, Microsoft Flight Simulator, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, DOTA 2A, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Monster Hunter World, Battlefield V, League of Legends (LOL), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, NBA 2K20, Forza Horizon 4, Half-Life: Alyx, Hitman 3, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Horizon Zero Dawn, Ghostrunner, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO).
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 142.2 | 143.1 | | Valorant | 161.6 | 162.6 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 90.5 | 91.0 | | Apex Legends | 151.9 | 152.8 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 121.2 | 121.9 | | Overwatch | 130.9 | 131.7 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 111.5 | 112.2 | | DOOM Eternal | 80.8 | 81.3 | | Warzone | 126.0 | 126.8 | | Assassin's Creed | 135.7 | 136.6 | | Valheim | 134.1 | 134.9 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| EPYC 7773X | 16% |
EPYC 7702 | 17% |
To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 7702 is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7773X as it consumes less power: 280W vs. 200W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, video editing or video rendering, machine learning, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU uses all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to reach maximum performance. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 7773X |
AMD EPYC 7702 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 248 | 216 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 9889 | 8896 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 481 | 406 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 24485 | 18857 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1115 | 996 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 54474 | 49035 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7773X |
AMD EPYC 7702 | | Single-Core | 2797 | 2099 | | Multi-Core | 79901 | 71929 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7773X |
AMD EPYC 7702 | | Single-Core | 1385 | 1023 | | Multi-Core | 53124 | 53995 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in the newest games. The savings are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD EPYC 7773X |
AMD EPYC 7702 | | Announcement date | March 22, 2022 | April 01, 2020 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | SP3 | SP3 | | Core name | Milan | Rome | | Architecture | Zen 3 | Zen | | Generation | 3 | 2 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.5 MHz | 3.4 MHz | | Frequency | 2.2 MHz | 2 MHz | | Cores | 64 | 64 | | Threads | 128 | 128 | | Bus rate | | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 86000 millions | 86000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 280 W | 200 W | | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4 | | Max. Memory | | | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | | | Memory bandwidth | 204.8 GB/s | | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 768MB | 256MB | | Overclocking | No | Yes | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | 100-000000504
100-000000504​WOF | 100-000000038
100-100000038WOF
|
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 7773X is 9% better than EPYC 7702 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7773X is better: 16
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7702 is better: 14
However, it should be understood that the summary data in the text above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch the video tests and read the reviews of of people who bought AMD EPYC 7773X and AMD EPYC 7702 before making a decision which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD EPYC 7773X Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 7702 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
• Vs Ryzen 9 5950X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 3950X
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X
• Vs Core i9-10900K
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Core i9-10850K
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs Core i9-12900K
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs Core i9-12900KF
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
• Vs Core i9-12900HX
• Vs Core i9-12950HX
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Core i9-13900KF
• Vs Core i7-13700K
• Vs Core i7-13700KF
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Core i5-13600KF
• Vs Core i9-13900KS
• Vs Core i9-13900
• Vs Core i7-13700
• Vs Apple M1 Ultra
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
|
|
|
