 |
Intel Core i9-12900TE vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
|
Processor comparisons 10-01-2022 You may have difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the full tests Intel Core i9-12900TE vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX and see which is better for games or simple use for video editing, streaming, rendering, machine learning, programming. Here is all information from various benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests like WPrime, GeekBench 6, 5.2, UserBenchmark, SuperPi, Blender, PCMark 10, Prime95, Dolphin Emulator, PassMark, 3DMark, 7zip, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, AIDA64, VeraCrypt, DaVinci Resolve Studio, MATLAB, Handbrake, Furmark, Blender, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Gears 5, RealBench. Gaming performance of processors in: - Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Valheim
- Valorant
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Last Man Standing
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Fortnite
- DOOM: Eternal
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Apex Legends
- Borderlands 3
- Death Stranding
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Fallout 76
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Overwatch
- Halo Infinite
After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX or Intel Core i9-12900TE.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i9-12900TE | 65% |
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | 69% | The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is 5% better than Core i9-12900TE. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i9-12900TE | 59% |
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | 66% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Half-Life: Alyx, League of Legends (LOL), PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Microsoft Flight Simulator, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Battlefield V, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Monster Hunter World, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, NBA 2K20, DOTA 2A, Control, Forza Horizon 4, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Horizon Zero Dawn, Hitman 3, Ghostrunner, Metro Exodus.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 103.9 | 116.6 | Valorant | 118.0 | 132.5 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 66.1 | 74.2 | Apex Legends | 110.9 | 124.5 | Call of Duty Warzone | 88.5 | 99.4 | Overwatch | 95.6 | 107.3 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 81.4 | 91.4 | DOOM Eternal | 59.0 | 66.2 | Warzone | 92.1 | 103.3 | Assassin's Creed | 99.1 | 111.3 | Valheim | 98.0 | 110.0 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i9-12900TE | 174% |
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | 15% | To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i9-12900TE is more energy efficient than the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX since it has less power consumption: 35W vs. 280W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, video editing or video rendering, programming, streaming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum efficiency, the processor includes all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i9-12900TE |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 432 | 209 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 4547 | 7575 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 721 | 509 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 10110 | 17768 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 2556 | 1244 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 29091 | 43450 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-12900TE |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | Single-Core | 6663 | 2639 | Multi-Core | 49735 | 63806 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-12900TE |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | Single-Core | 1829 | 1283 | Multi-Core | 15550 | 28017 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. The savings are obvious! It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i9-12900TE |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | Announcement date | July 21, 2021 | July 14, 2020 | Type | Embedded | Desktop | Socket | FCLGA1700 | sTRX4 | Core name | Alder Lake | Matisse | Architecture | x86 | Zen 2 | Generation | 12 | 3 | Turbo Frequency | 4.8 MHz | 4.2 MHz | Frequency | 3.6 MHz | 3.5 MHz | Cores | 16 | 32 | Threads | 24 | 64 | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 12600 millions | 22600 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 35 W | 280 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | DDR4 | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 6400 | 3200 | Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | 2 MB | 2MB | L2 cache | 14 MB | 16MB | L3 cache | 30 MB | 128MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | | 100-000000086
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i9-12900TE is 2% better than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX has 16 more core than Core i9-12900TE. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-12900TE is better: 15
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is better: 21 However, it should be understood that the summary data in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should totally trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch the testing video and read the opinion of real owners of Intel Core i9-12900TE and AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX before making a choice which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i9-12900TE Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i7-12800 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Core i7-12700E • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Core i7-12700HL • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Core i7-12800HL • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-13700HX
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
| |
|