Processor comparisons 25-03-2021 If you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a decision by looking at the AMD EPYC 7452 vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX tests and decide which is better for games or simple use for machine learning, rendering, programming, streaming, video editing. Here you can find all information from different benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A thorough review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like UserBenchmark, SuperPi, RealBench, Furmark, PCMark 10, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Blender, 7zip, 3DMark, AIDA64, WPrime, Geekbench 5.2, Handbrake, Dolphin Emulator, MATLAB, Blender, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, VeraCrypt, PassMark, Gears 5, Prime95. And how good the CPUs are in games: - DOOM: Eternal
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Halo Infinite
- Borderlands 3
- Fortnite
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Valorant
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Valheim
- Fallout 76
- Apex Legends
- Overwatch
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Death Stranding
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Last Man Standing
After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX or AMD EPYC 7452.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
EPYC 7452 | 71% |
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | 79% | This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is 10% better than EPYC 7452. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.EPYC 7452 | 56% |
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | 74% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Microsoft Flight Simulator, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Horizon Zero Dawn, DOTA 2A, Ghostrunner, Half-Life: Alyx, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Hitman 3, Monster Hunter World, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Forza Horizon 4, Metro Exodus, NBA 2K20, League of Legends (LOL), Battlefield V, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Control.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 98.6 | 131.3 | Valorant | 112.0 | 149.2 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 62.7 | 83.6 | Apex Legends | 105.3 | 140.3 | Call of Duty Warzone | 84.0 | 111.9 | Overwatch | 90.7 | 120.9 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 77.3 | 103.0 | DOOM Eternal | 56.0 | 74.6 | Warzone | 87.4 | 116.4 | Assassin's Creed | 94.1 | 125.3 | Valheim | 93.0 | 123.8 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
EPYC 7452 | 21% |
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | 15% | To make a final resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 7452 is more energy efficient than the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX since it has less power consumption: 155W vs. 280W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, video rendering or video editing, programming, streaming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU uses all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to reach maximum performance. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 7452 |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 135 | 209 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 5590 | 7575 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 391 | 509 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 11848 | 17768 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 626 | 1244 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 30808 | 43450 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7452 |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | Single-Core | 2155 | 2639 | Multi-Core | 45191 | 63806 |
GeekBench 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7452 |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | Single-Core | 990 | 1283 | Multi-Core | 6837 | 28017 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in the newest games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| AMD EPYC 7452 |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | Announcement date | October 01, 2019 | July 14, 2020 | Type | Server | Desktop | Socket | SP3 | sTRX4 | Core name | Rome | Matisse | Architecture | Zen 2 | Zen 2 | Generation | 2 | 3 | Turbo Frequency | 3.35 MHz | 4.2 MHz | Frequency | 2.35 MHz | 3.5 MHz | Cores | 32 | 32 | Threads | 64 | 64 | Bus rate | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 56000 millions | 22600 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 155 W | 280 W | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4 | Max. Memory | | | Memory Frequency | | 3200 | Memory bandwidth | | | L1 cache | | 2MB | L2 cache | | 16MB | L3 cache | 128MB | 128MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | 100-000000057 100-100000057WOF
| 100-000000086
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is 32% better than EPYC 7452 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7452 is better: 2
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is better: 28 However, it should be realized that all the data in the text above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of real owners of AMD EPYC 7452 and AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX before deciding which processor to buy for gaming and which not. • Cinebench r15 score • Cinebench r20 score • Cinebench r23 score • GeekBench 5 score
Versus Battle of the Processors • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Core i9-13900K Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs EPYC 7663
• Cinebench r15 score • Cinebench r20 score • Cinebench r23 score • GeekBench 5 score • Fortnite gaming benchmark • Roblox gaming benchmark • Valorant gaming benchmark • Cyberpunk 2077 gaming benchmark • Apex Legends gaming benchmark • Call of Duty: Warzone gaming benchmark • Overwatch gaming benchmark • Red Dead Redemption 2 gaming benchmark • DOOM Eternal gaming benchmark • Assassin's Creed gaming benchmark • GTA 5 gaming benchmark • PUBG gaming benchmark
Versus Battle of the Processors • Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Core i9-13900K Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs EPYC 7702 • EPYC 7742 Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Core i9-12900K Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Core i9-12900HK Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Core i9-12900H Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Ryzen Threadripper 3960X Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
|