 |
Intel Xeon Gold 6434 vs AMD EPYC 7662 |
|
Processor comparisons 29-03-2023
If you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a choice after reading the full tests Intel Xeon Gold 6434 vs AMD EPYC 7662 and decide which is better for games or simple use for machine learning, streaming, video editing, rendering, programming. Here is all information from several benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is made by the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like Handbrake, UserBenchmark, AIDA64, PCMark 10, WPrime, Blender, VeraCrypt, Prime95, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Blender, Gears 5, MATLAB, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PassMark, 3DMark, Furmark, SuperPi, Dolphin Emulator, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), DaVinci Resolve Studio, RealBench, 7zip.
And how good the CPUs are in games: - Death Stranding
- Valorant
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Valheim
- DOOM: Eternal
- Overwatch
- Halo Infinite
- Borderlands 3
- Last Man Standing
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Apex Legends
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Fortnite
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Fallout 76
After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7662 or Intel Xeon Gold 6434.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Xeon Gold 6434 | 62% |
EPYC 7662 | 72% |
The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7662 is 13% better than Xeon Gold 6434. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Xeon Gold 6434 | 64% |
EPYC 7662 | 84% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of less popular games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, DOTA 2A, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Battlefield V, Ghostrunner, Hitman 3, NBA 2K20, Half-Life: Alyx, Forza Horizon 4, Horizon Zero Dawn, League of Legends (LOL), Metro Exodus, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Monster Hunter World, Control, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG).
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 112.8 | 149.3 | | Valorant | 128.2 | 169.6 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 71.8 | 95.0 | | Apex Legends | 120.5 | 159.5 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 96.1 | 127.2 | | Overwatch | 103.8 | 137.4 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 88.5 | 117.1 | | DOOM Eternal | 64.1 | 84.8 | | Warzone | 100.0 | 132.3 | | Assassin's Creed | 107.7 | 142.5 | | Valheim | 106.4 | 140.8 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Xeon Gold 6434 | 27% |
EPYC 7662 | 16% |
To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Xeon Gold 6434 is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7662 as it consumes less power: 195W vs. 225W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video rendering or video editing, programming, machine learning, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU uses all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum efficiency. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Xeon Gold 6434 |
AMD EPYC 7662 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 885 | 204 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2858 | 9116 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 1964 | 523 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 7051 | 19338 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1368 | 1006 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 40142 | 50318 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Gold 6434 |
AMD EPYC 7662 | | Single-Core | 12464 | 2880 | | Multi-Core | 40862 | 73932 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Gold 6434 |
AMD EPYC 7662 | | Single-Core | 1607 | 1093 | | Multi-Core | 24327 | 60084 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Xeon Gold 6434 |
AMD EPYC 7662 | | Announcement date | March 12, 2023 | October 01, 2020 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | FCLGA4677 | SP3 | | Core name | Sapphire Rapids | Rome | | Architecture | x86 | Zen 2 | | Generation | 4 | 2 | | Turbo Frequency | 4.1 MHz | 3.3 MHz | | Frequency | 3.7 MHz | 2 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 64 | | Threads | 16 | 128 | | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 36000 millions | 64000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 195 W | 225 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s 1DPC Up to DDR5 4400 MT/s 2DPC | DDR4 | | Max. Memory | 4 Gb | | | Memory Frequency | | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | | 208 GByte/s | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 22.5 MB | 256MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | Yes | No | | Part number | | 100-000000137
100-000000137WOF |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Xeon Gold 6434 is 45% better than EPYC 7662 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7662 has 56 more core than Xeon Gold 6434. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon Gold 6434 is better: 13
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7662 is better: 22
Although it should be realized that the summary data in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch the testing video and read the reviews of of people who bought Intel Xeon Gold 6434 and AMD EPYC 7662 before deciding which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Xeon Gold 6434 Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 7662 Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
|
|
|
