Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
Intel Xeon Gold 6434H vs AMD EPYC 7662 gaming benchmark

Intel Xeon Gold 6434H vs AMD EPYC 7662

Processor comparisons   29-03-2023
   Let's say you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a choice by looking at the Intel Xeon Gold 6434H vs AMD EPYC 7662 tests and see which is better for games or simple use for programming, streaming, machine learning, rendering, video editing. Here is all information from real streaming and video editing tests or different benchmarks. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is made by the table.
   From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like WPrime, UserBenchmark, Prime95, AIDA64, 7zip, PassMark, 3DMark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, MATLAB, Blender, VeraCrypt, Handbrake, Blender, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Furmark, Gears 5, RealBench, SuperPi, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Dolphin Emulator, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PCMark 10.
   Gaming performance of CPUs in:
  • Borderlands 3
  • Fallout 76
  • Assassin's Creed Valhalla
  • Rainbow Six Siege
  • Overwatch
  • Death Stranding
  • Apex Legends
  • Valheim
  • Red Dead Redemption 2
  • Grand Theft Auto V
  • Valorant
  • World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
  • Cyberpunk 2077
  • DOOM: Eternal
  • Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
  • Watch Dogs Legion
  • Last Man Standing
  • Fortnite
  • Halo Infinite

   After looking at the data of all benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7662 or Intel Xeon Gold 6434H.


 
Intel Xeon Gold 6434H
AMD EPYC 7662

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
Xeon Gold 6434H62% EPYC 766272%
This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7662 is 13% better than Xeon Gold 6434H. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.

Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.
Xeon Gold 6434H64% EPYC 766284%
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of other games in which processors were compared: PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Battlefield V, League of Legends (LOL), NBA 2K20, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Monster Hunter World, DOTA 2A, Hitman 3, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Control, Forza Horizon 4, Half-Life: Alyx, Ghostrunner, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Horizon Zero Dawn, Metro Exodus.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite113.1149.3
Valorant128.5169.6
Cyberpunk 207771.995.0
Apex Legends120.8159.5
Call of Duty Warzone96.4127.2
Overwatch104.1137.4
Red Dead Redemption 288.6117.1
DOOM Eternal64.284.8
Warzone100.2132.3
Assassin's Creed107.9142.5
Valheim106.6140.8
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.


Power consumption
Xeon Gold 6434H27% EPYC 766216%
To make a final resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Xeon Gold 6434H is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7662 as it consumes less power: 195W vs. 225W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.

Software benchmarks

If you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, programming, video editing or video rendering, streaming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the CPU turns on all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance
Intel Xeon Gold 6434H AMD EPYC 7662
Cinbench 15 Single-core886204
Cinbench 15 Multi-core28799116
Cinbench 20 Single-core1976523
Cinbench 20 Multi-core711419338
Cinbench 23 Single-core13741006
Cinbench 23 Multi-core4053550318

Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
Intel Xeon Gold 6434H AMD EPYC 7662
Single-Core125812880
Multi-Core4126373932

GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
Intel Xeon Gold 6434H AMD EPYC 7662
Single-Core16151093
Multi-Core2456260084

Comparison of specifications

In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!

Intel Xeon Gold 6434H AMD EPYC 7662
Announcement dateMarch 11, 2023October 01, 2020
TypeServerServer
SocketFCLGA4677SP3
Core nameSapphire RapidsRome
Architecturex86Zen 2
Generation42
Turbo Frequency4.1 MHz3.3 MHz
Frequency3.7 MHz2 MHz
Cores864
Threads16128
Bus rate16 GT/s
Bit6464
Lithography7 nm7 nm
Transistors count36000 millions64000 millions
Power consumption (TDP)195 W225 W
Memory typeUp to DDR5 4800 MT/s 1DPC Up to DDR5 4400 MT/s 2DPCDDR4
Max. Memory4096 Gb
Memory Frequency3200
Memory bandwidth208 GByte/s
L1 cache
L2 cache
L3 cache22.5 MB256MB
OverclockingNoNo
Supports ECCYesNo
Part number100-000000137
100-000000137WOF
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Xeon Gold 6434H is 45% better than EPYC 7662 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7662 has 56 more core than Xeon Gold 6434H. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).

Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon Gold 6434H is better: 13
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7662 is better: 22
   Although it should be understood that the summary data in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Xeon Gold 6434H and AMD EPYC 7662 before making a selection which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Xeon Gold 6434H - all data

•  Cinebench r15 score
•  Cinebench r20 score
•  Cinebench r23 score
•  GeekBench 6, 5.2 score
AMD EPYC 7662 - all data

•  Cinebench r15 score
•  Cinebench r20 score
•  Cinebench r23 score
•  GeekBench 6, 5.2 score


Intel Xeon Gold 6434H Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+


AMD EPYC 7662 Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands