 |
AMD EPYC 7773X vs AMD EPYC 7662 |
|
Processor comparisons 20-04-2023
Let's say you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a decision by looking at the AMD EPYC 7773X vs AMD EPYC 7662 tests and see which is better for games or normal use for streaming, video editing, machine learning, rendering, programming. Here you can find all information from several benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests like SuperPi, AIDA64, 3DMark, Gears 5, RealBench, PassMark, Dolphin Emulator, Furmark, WPrime, Prime95, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), VeraCrypt, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Blender, 7zip, DaVinci Resolve Studio, PCMark 10, UserBenchmark, MATLAB, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Handbrake, Blender.
And how good the processors are in games: - Fallout 76
- Valorant
- DOOM: Eternal
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Apex Legends
- Fortnite
- Valheim
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Rainbow Six Siege
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Death Stranding
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Halo Infinite
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Last Man Standing
- Borderlands 3
- Overwatch
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7662 or AMD EPYC 7773X.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| EPYC 7773X | 74% |
EPYC 7662 | 72% |
This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7773X is 2% better than EPYC 7662. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| EPYC 7773X | 80% |
EPYC 7662 | 84% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: NBA 2K20, Half-Life: Alyx, Ghostrunner, Horizon Zero Dawn, League of Legends (LOL), Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Hitman 3, Metro Exodus, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Monster Hunter World, Forza Horizon 4, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Control, DOTA 2A, Battlefield V.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 142.2 | 149.3 | | Valorant | 161.6 | 169.6 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 90.5 | 95.0 | | Apex Legends | 151.9 | 159.5 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 121.2 | 127.2 | | Overwatch | 130.9 | 137.4 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 111.5 | 117.1 | | DOOM Eternal | 80.8 | 84.8 | | Warzone | 126.0 | 132.3 | | Assassin's Creed | 135.7 | 142.5 | | Valheim | 134.1 | 140.8 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| EPYC 7773X | 16% |
EPYC 7662 | 16% |
Software benchmarksLet's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, programming, video editing or video rendering, machine learning, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the processor turns on all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 7773X |
AMD EPYC 7662 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 248 | 204 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 9889 | 9116 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 481 | 523 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 24485 | 19338 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1115 | 1006 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 54474 | 50318 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7773X |
AMD EPYC 7662 | | Single-Core | 2797 | 2880 | | Multi-Core | 79901 | 73932 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7773X |
AMD EPYC 7662 | | Single-Core | 1385 | 1093 | | Multi-Core | 53124 | 60084 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in the newest games. The savings are obvious! Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD EPYC 7773X |
AMD EPYC 7662 | | Announcement date | March 22, 2022 | October 01, 2020 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | SP3 | SP3 | | Core name | Milan | Rome | | Architecture | Zen 3 | Zen 2 | | Generation | 3 | 2 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.5 MHz | 3.3 MHz | | Frequency | 2.2 MHz | 2 MHz | | Cores | 64 | 64 | | Threads | 128 | 128 | | Bus rate | | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 86000 millions | 64000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 280 W | 225 W | | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4 | | Max. Memory | | | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | 204.8 GB/s | 208 GByte/s | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 768MB | 256MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | 100-000000504
100-000000504​WOF | 100-000000137
100-000000137WOF |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 7773X is 9% better than EPYC 7662 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7773X is better: 13
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7662 is better: 16
Although it should be understood that the summary data in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of real owners of AMD EPYC 7773X and AMD EPYC 7662 before making a selection which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD EPYC 7773X Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 7662 Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
|
|
|
