 |
AMD EPYC 7662 vs AMD EPYC 7542 |
|
Processor comparisons 27-03-2023
You may have difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the comprehensive tests AMD EPYC 7662 vs AMD EPYC 7542 and understand which is better for games or normal use for video editing, rendering, programming, machine learning, streaming. Here you can find useful information from real video editing and streaming tests or different benchmarks. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software like Blender, AIDA64, Furmark, MATLAB, PassMark, Dolphin Emulator, 3DMark, UserBenchmark, Prime95, Blender, RealBench, DaVinci Resolve Studio, WPrime, SuperPi, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), 7zip, Gears 5, GeekBench 6, 5.2, VeraCrypt, Handbrake, PCMark 10, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark.
And how good the CPUs are in games: - Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Fortnite
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Halo Infinite
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Apex Legends
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Overwatch
- Fallout 76
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Last Man Standing
- DOOM: Eternal
- Death Stranding
- Valorant
- Valheim
- Borderlands 3
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Rainbow Six Siege
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7542 or AMD EPYC 7662.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| EPYC 7662 | 72% |
EPYC 7542 | 67% |
This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7662 is 6% better than EPYC 7542. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| EPYC 7662 | 84% |
EPYC 7542 | 76% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: DOTA 2A, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Forza Horizon 4, Monster Hunter World, Metro Exodus, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), League of Legends (LOL), Microsoft Flight Simulator, NBA 2K20, Half-Life: Alyx, Battlefield V, Control, Ghostrunner, Horizon Zero Dawn, Hitman 3.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 149.3 | 134.8 | | Valorant | 169.6 | 153.2 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 95.0 | 85.8 | | Apex Legends | 159.5 | 144.0 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 127.2 | 114.9 | | Overwatch | 137.4 | 124.1 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 117.1 | 105.7 | | DOOM Eternal | 84.8 | 76.6 | | Warzone | 132.3 | 119.5 | | Assassin's Creed | 142.5 | 128.7 | | Valheim | 140.8 | 127.1 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| EPYC 7662 | 16% |
EPYC 7542 | 16% |
Software benchmarksFor example you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, video rendering or video editing, streaming, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum efficiency, the CPU includes all threads and cores that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 7662 |
AMD EPYC 7542 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 204 | 174 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 9116 | 7016 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 523 | 419 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 19338 | 14867 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1006 | 789 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 50318 | 38654 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7662 |
AMD EPYC 7542 | | Single-Core | 2880 | 2227 | | Multi-Core | 73932 | 56789 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7662 |
AMD EPYC 7542 | | Single-Core | 1093 | 1098 | | Multi-Core | 60084 | 45863 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| AMD EPYC 7662 |
AMD EPYC 7542 | | Announcement date | October 01, 2020 | October 01, 2020 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | SP3 | SP3 | | Core name | Rome | Rome | | Architecture | Zen 2 | Zen 2 | | Generation | 2 | 2 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.3 MHz | 3.4 MHz | | Frequency | 2 MHz | 2.9 MHz | | Cores | 64 | 32 | | Threads | 128 | 64 | | Bus rate | | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 64000 millions | 64000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 225 W | 225 W | | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4 | | Max. Memory | | | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | 208 GByte/s | | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 256MB | 128MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | 100-000000137
100-000000137WOF | 100-000000075
100-100000075WOF |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 7542 is 31% better than EPYC 7662 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7662 has 32 more core than EPYC 7542. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7662 is better: 24
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7542 is better: 3
Although it should be understood that the summary data that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should completely trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch the testing video and read the opinion of real owners of AMD EPYC 7662 and AMD EPYC 7542 before making a decision which of the processors to buy for gaming.
AMD EPYC 7662 Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 7542 Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
|
|
|
