 |
AMD EPYC 7702P vs AMD EPYC 7662 |
|
Processor comparisons 27-03-2023
Let's say you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a decision by looking at the AMD EPYC 7702P vs AMD EPYC 7662 tests and see which is better for games or normal use for rendering, video editing, machine learning, streaming, programming. Here is useful information from real streaming and video editing tests or various benchmarks. A careful analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests like VeraCrypt, 3DMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, 7zip, Blender, PassMark, RealBench, UserBenchmark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, PCMark 10, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Blender, SuperPi, WPrime, Prime95, Handbrake, Dolphin Emulator, AIDA64, Furmark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Gears 5, MATLAB.
Gaming performance of processors in: - Halo Infinite
- Apex Legends
- Borderlands 3
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Last Man Standing
- Valorant
- Fortnite
- Overwatch
- Death Stranding
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Fallout 76
- Valheim
- DOOM: Eternal
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Watch Dogs Legion
After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7662 or AMD EPYC 7702P.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| EPYC 7702P | 70% |
EPYC 7662 | 72% |
This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7662 is 2% better than EPYC 7702P. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| EPYC 7702P | 80% |
EPYC 7662 | 84% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which processors were compared: The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Control, Metro Exodus, League of Legends (LOL), Hitman 3, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, DOTA 2A, NBA 2K20, Monster Hunter World, Half-Life: Alyx, Horizon Zero Dawn, Battlefield V, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Ghostrunner, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Forza Horizon 4, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Microsoft Flight Simulator.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 141.7 | 149.3 | | Valorant | 161.1 | 169.6 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 90.2 | 95.0 | | Apex Legends | 151.4 | 159.5 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 120.8 | 127.2 | | Overwatch | 130.5 | 137.4 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 111.1 | 117.1 | | DOOM Eternal | 80.5 | 84.8 | | Warzone | 125.6 | 132.3 | | Assassin's Creed | 135.3 | 142.5 | | Valheim | 133.7 | 140.8 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The tested computers not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| EPYC 7702P | 18% |
EPYC 7662 | 16% |
To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 7702P is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7662 as it consumes less power: 200W vs. 225W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video rendering or video editing, programming, streaming, machine learning, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum efficiency, the processor turns on all threads and cores that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 7702P |
AMD EPYC 7662 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 198 | 204 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 8182 | 9116 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 370 | 523 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 18282 | 19338 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 957 | 1006 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 47555 | 50318 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7702P |
AMD EPYC 7662 | | Single-Core | 2135 | 2880 | | Multi-Core | 66158 | 73932 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7702P |
AMD EPYC 7662 | | Single-Core | 1086 | 1093 | | Multi-Core | 52674 | 60084 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. The economy are obvious! It turns out that you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD EPYC 7702P |
AMD EPYC 7662 | | Announcement date | April 01, 2019 | October 01, 2020 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | SP3 | SP3 | | Core name | Rome | Rome | | Architecture | Zen 2 | Zen 2 | | Generation | 2 | 2 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.35 MHz | 3.3 MHz | | Frequency | 2 MHz | 2 MHz | | Cores | 64 | 64 | | Threads | 128 | 128 | | Bus rate | | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 86000 millions | 64000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 200 W | 225 W | | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4 | | Max. Memory | | | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | 208 GByte/s | 208 GByte/s | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 256MB | 256MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | 100-000000047
100-100000047WOF | 100-000000137
100-000000137WOF |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7702P is better: 3
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7662 is better: 22
Although it should be understood that the summary data that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the reviews of of people who bought AMD EPYC 7702P and AMD EPYC 7662 before making a selection which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
AMD EPYC 7702P Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 7662 Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
|
|
|
