AMD EPYC 7662 vs AMD EPYC 7313P

Processor comparisons 27-03-2023

   Let's say you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a decision by looking at the AMD EPYC 7662 vs AMD EPYC 7313P tests and decide which is better for games or normal use for rendering, streaming, video editing, programming, machine learning. Here is useful information from different benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table.
   From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests like World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Blender, WPrime, Handbrake, Prime95, GeekBench 6, 5.2, VeraCrypt, MATLAB, Dolphin Emulator, Blender, Furmark, RealBench, UserBenchmark, PCMark 10, 7zip, 3DMark, PassMark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), SuperPi, AIDA64, Gears 5.
   Gaming performance of CPUs in:

Death Stranding
Watch Dogs Legion
Halo Infinite
Apex Legends
DOOM: Eternal
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
Fallout 76
Red Dead Redemption 2
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Last Man Standing
Borderlands 3
Valheim
Rainbow Six Siege
Cyberpunk 2077
Grand Theft Auto V
Valorant
Fortnite
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
Overwatch

After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7313P or AMD EPYC 7662.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark

EPYC 7662

72%

EPYC 7313P

61%

The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7662 is 15% better than EPYC 7313P. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.

Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.

EPYC 7662

84%

EPYC 7313P

62%

For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Ghostrunner, Control, Metro Exodus, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), League of Legends (LOL), Battlefield V, Hitman 3, Monster Hunter World, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, NBA 2K20, Horizon Zero Dawn, Forza Horizon 4, Half-Life: Alyx, DOTA 2A.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite	149.3	110.7
Valorant	169.6	125.8
Cyberpunk 2077	95.0	70.5
Apex Legends	159.5	118.3
Call of Duty Warzone	127.2	94.4
Overwatch	137.4	101.9
Red Dead Redemption 2	117.1	86.8
DOOM Eternal	84.8	62.9
Warzone	132.3	98.2
Assassin's Creed	142.5	105.7
Valheim	140.8	104.5

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.

Power consumption

EPYC 7662

16%

EPYC 7313P

28%

To make a final resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 7313P is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7662 since it has less power consumption: 225W vs. 155W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.

Software benchmarks

If you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, video rendering or video editing, machine learning, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor uses all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to reach maximum performance. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.

Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance

	AMD EPYC 7662	AMD EPYC 7313P
Cinbench 15 Single-core	204	116
Cinbench 15 Multi-core	9116	4742
Cinbench 20 Single-core	523	215
Cinbench 20 Multi-core	19338	10051
Cinbench 23 Single-core	1006	531
Cinbench 23 Multi-core	50318	26137

Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	AMD EPYC 7662	AMD EPYC 7313P
Single-Core	2880	1195
Multi-Core	73932	38338

GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	AMD EPYC 7662	AMD EPYC 7313P
Single-Core	1093	1329
Multi-Core	60084	22297

Comparison of specifications

In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in the newest games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.

	AMD EPYC 7662	AMD EPYC 7313P
Announcement date	October 01, 2020	March 15, 2021
Type	Server	Server
Socket	SP3	SP3
Core name	Rome	Milan
Architecture	Zen 2	Zen 3
Generation	2	3
Turbo Frequency	3.3 MHz	3.7 MHz
Frequency	2 MHz	3 MHz
Cores	64	16
Threads	128	32
Bus rate
Bit	64	64
Lithography	7 nm	7 nm
Transistors count	64000 millions	54000 millions
Power consumption (TDP)	225 W	155 W
Memory type	DDR4	DDR4
Max. Memory
Memory Frequency	3200	3200
Memory bandwidth	208 GByte/s	204.8 GB/s
L1 cache
L2 cache
L3 cache	256MB	128MB
Overclocking	No	No
Supports ECC	No	No
Part number	100-000000137 100-000000137WOF	100-000000339 100-100000339WOF

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 7313P is 33% better than EPYC 7662 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7662 has 48 more core than EPYC 7313P. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).

Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7662 is better: 25
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7313P is better: 6
The summary data that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of of people who bought AMD EPYC 7662 and AMD EPYC 7313P before making a choice which processor to buy for gaming and which not.

AMD EPYC 7662 - all data

• Cinebench r15 score
• Cinebench r20 score
• Cinebench r23 score
• GeekBench 6, 5.2 score

• AMD EPYC 7662 specs and review.

AMD EPYC 7313P - all data

• Cinebench r15 score
• Cinebench r20 score
• Cinebench r23 score
• GeekBench 6, 5.2 score

• AMD EPYC 7313P specs and review.