|
AMD EPYC 7662 vs AMD EPYC 7413 |
|
Processor comparisons 27-03-2023 Let's say you are thinking about choosing a processor, you will be able to make a decision after reading the comprehensive tests AMD EPYC 7662 vs AMD EPYC 7413 and understand which is better for games or normal use for video editing, streaming, machine learning, rendering, programming. Here is useful information from real video editing and streaming tests or different benchmarks. A careful review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software such as PCMark 10, Handbrake, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, UserBenchmark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Blender, Gears 5, 7zip, VeraCrypt, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Furmark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), AIDA64, RealBench, SuperPi, 3DMark, Blender, WPrime, Prime95, Dolphin Emulator, MATLAB, PassMark. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Cyberpunk 2077
- Borderlands 3
- Apex Legends
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Valheim
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Halo Infinite
- Last Man Standing
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Grand Theft Auto V
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Fallout 76
- Overwatch
- Death Stranding
- DOOM: Eternal
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Valorant
- Fortnite
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7413 or AMD EPYC 7662.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
EPYC 7662 | 72% |
EPYC 7413 | 66% | This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7662 is 8% better than EPYC 7413. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.EPYC 7662 | 84% |
EPYC 7413 | 74% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Control, DOTA 2A, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Metro Exodus, Microsoft Flight Simulator, NBA 2K20, Hitman 3, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Half-Life: Alyx, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Monster Hunter World, Forza Horizon 4, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Ghostrunner, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), League of Legends (LOL), Horizon Zero Dawn, Battlefield V.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 149.3 | 130.7 | Valorant | 169.6 | 148.5 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 95.0 | 83.2 | Apex Legends | 159.5 | 139.6 | Call of Duty Warzone | 127.2 | 111.4 | Overwatch | 137.4 | 120.3 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 117.1 | 102.5 | DOOM Eternal | 84.8 | 74.3 | Warzone | 132.3 | 115.8 | Assassin's Creed | 142.5 | 124.7 | Valheim | 140.8 | 123.3 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
EPYC 7662 | 16% |
EPYC 7413 | 24% | To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 7413 is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7662 since it has less power consumption: 225W vs. 180W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, streaming, video rendering or video editing, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the processor uses all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 7662 |
AMD EPYC 7413 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 204 | 155 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 9116 | 6534 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 523 | 294 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 19338 | 13852 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1006 | 729 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 50318 | 36025 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7662 |
AMD EPYC 7413 | Single-Core | 2880 | 1644 | Multi-Core | 73932 | 52845 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7662 |
AMD EPYC 7413 | Single-Core | 1093 | 1341 | Multi-Core | 60084 | 41847 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in the newest games. Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| AMD EPYC 7662 |
AMD EPYC 7413 | Announcement date | October 01, 2020 | March 15, 2021 | Type | Server | Server | Socket | SP3 | SP3 | Core name | Rome | Milan | Architecture | Zen 2 | Zen 3 | Generation | 2 | 3 | Turbo Frequency | 3.3 MHz | 3.6 MHz | Frequency | 2 MHz | 2.65 MHz | Cores | 64 | 24 | Threads | 128 | 48 | Bus rate | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 64000 millions | 62000 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 225 W | 180 W | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4 | Max. Memory | | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 3200 | Memory bandwidth | 208 GByte/s | 204.8 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 256MB | 128MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | 100-000000137 100-000000137WOF | 100-000000323 100-100000323WOF
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 7413 is 24% better than EPYC 7662 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7662 has 40 more core than EPYC 7413. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7662 is better: 25
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7413 is better: 6 Although it should be realized that all the figures that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should completely trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of of people who bought AMD EPYC 7662 and AMD EPYC 7413 before making a selection which of the processors to buy for gaming.
AMD EPYC 7662 Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 7413 Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Xeon W-2275 • Vs Core i9-9940X • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs Core i7-12700E • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i7-12700HL • Vs Core i7-12800HL • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
| |
|