Processor comparisons 25-03-2021 If you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a decision by looking at the AMD EPYC 7452 vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X tests and decide which is better for games or normal use for programming, rendering, video editing, machine learning, streaming. Here is all information from real streaming and video editing tests or different benchmarks. A careful analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests such as Prime95, Blender, UserBenchmark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, AIDA64, 3DMark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Furmark, VeraCrypt, Blender, Gears 5, SuperPi, 7zip, WPrime, MATLAB, PCMark 10, Geekbench 5.2, Dolphin Emulator, PassMark, Handbrake, RealBench. And how good the CPUs are in games: - Valheim
- Overwatch
- Apex Legends
- Borderlands 3
- Valorant
- Rainbow Six Siege
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- DOOM: Eternal
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Last Man Standing
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Fallout 76
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Fortnite
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Halo Infinite
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Death Stranding
After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X or AMD EPYC 7452.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
EPYC 7452 | 71% |
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X | 80% | This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is 11% better than EPYC 7452. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.EPYC 7452 | 56% |
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X | 73% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: NBA 2K20, DOTA 2A, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Monster Hunter World, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Microsoft Flight Simulator, Half-Life: Alyx, Forza Horizon 4, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Control, League of Legends (LOL), Ghostrunner, Horizon Zero Dawn, Hitman 3, Metro Exodus, Battlefield V.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 98.6 | 130.2 | Valorant | 112.0 | 147.9 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 62.7 | 82.8 | Apex Legends | 105.3 | 139.1 | Call of Duty Warzone | 84.0 | 110.9 | Overwatch | 90.7 | 119.8 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 77.3 | 102.1 | DOOM Eternal | 56.0 | 74.0 | Warzone | 87.4 | 115.4 | Assassin's Creed | 94.1 | 124.3 | Valheim | 93.0 | 122.8 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The tested computers not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
EPYC 7452 | 21% |
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X | 15% | To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 7452 is more energy efficient than the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X as it consumes less power: 155W vs. 280W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, programming, streaming, video editing or video rendering, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the processor turns on all cores and threads that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 7452 |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 135 | 209 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 5590 | 7398 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 391 | 509 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 11848 | 17444 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 626 | 1270 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 30808 | 47102 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7452 |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X | Single-Core | 2155 | 2686 | Multi-Core | 45191 | 64446 |
GeekBench 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7452 |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X | Single-Core | 990 | 1312 | Multi-Core | 6837 | 27290 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in the newest games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD EPYC 7452 |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X | Announcement date | October 01, 2019 | November 25, 2019 | Type | Server | Desktop | Socket | SP3 | sTRX4 | Core name | Rome | Castle Peak | Architecture | Zen 2 | Zen 2 | Generation | 2 | 3 | Turbo Frequency | 3.35 MHz | 4.5 MHz | Frequency | 2.35 MHz | 3.7 MHz | Cores | 32 | 32 | Threads | 64 | 64 | Bus rate | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 56000 millions | 22600 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 155 W | 280 W | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4 | Max. Memory | | | Memory Frequency | | 3200 | Memory bandwidth | | | L1 cache | | 2MB | L2 cache | | 16MB | L3 cache | 128MB | 128MB | Overclocking | No | Yes | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | 100-000000057 100-100000057WOF
| 100-000000011 100-100000011WOF
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is 36% better than EPYC 7452 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7452 is better: 2
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is better: 29 Although it should be understood that all the number in the table above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the reviews of of people who bought AMD EPYC 7452 and AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X before making a choice which of the CPUs to buy for gaming. • Cinebench r15 score • Cinebench r20 score • Cinebench r23 score • GeekBench 5 score
Versus Battle of the Processors • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Core i9-13900K Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs EPYC 7663
• Assassin's Creed gaming benchmark • Cinebench r15 score • Cinebench r20 score • Cinebench r23 score • GeekBench 5 score • Fortnite gaming benchmark • Roblox gaming benchmark • Valorant gaming benchmark • Cyberpunk 2077 gaming benchmark • Apex Legends gaming benchmark • Call of Duty: Warzone gaming benchmark • Overwatch gaming benchmark • Red Dead Redemption 2 gaming benchmark • DOOM Eternal gaming benchmark • GTA 5 gaming benchmark • PUBG gaming benchmark
Versus Battle of the Processors • Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Core i9-13900K Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs EPYC 7702 • EPYC 7742 Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Core i9-12900K Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Core i9-12900H Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Ryzen Threadripper 3960X Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Core i9-12900KF Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
|