|
Intel Core i5-13600KF vs AMD EPYC 7452 |
|
Processor comparisons 29-09-2022 Let's say you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a choice after reading the comprehensive tests Intel Core i5-13600KF vs AMD EPYC 7452 and decide which is better for games or simple use for machine learning, programming, streaming, video editing, rendering. Here you can find useful information from real streaming and video editing tests or several benchmarks. A thorough analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests such as 3DMark, Handbrake, RealBench, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), WPrime, Blender, 7zip, Furmark, Gears 5, UserBenchmark, PCMark 10, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, MATLAB, VeraCrypt, GeekBench 6, 5.2, SuperPi, AIDA64, PassMark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Dolphin Emulator, Prime95, Blender. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Apex Legends
- Last Man Standing
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Fortnite
- Grand Theft Auto V
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Valorant
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Death Stranding
- Overwatch
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Valheim
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Halo Infinite
- DOOM: Eternal
- Borderlands 3
- Fallout 76
After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7452 or Intel Core i5-13600KF.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i5-13600KF | 63% |
EPYC 7452 | 63% |
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i5-13600KF | 58% |
EPYC 7452 | 53% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of less popular games in which processors were compared: League of Legends (LOL), Monster Hunter World, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, DOTA 2A, Forza Horizon 4, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), NBA 2K20, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Ghostrunner, Hitman 3, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Horizon Zero Dawn, Metro Exodus, Half-Life: Alyx, Control, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Battlefield V.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 102.3 | 95.0 | Valorant | 116.2 | 107.9 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 65.1 | 60.4 | Apex Legends | 109.2 | 101.4 | Call of Duty Warzone | 87.1 | 80.9 | Overwatch | 94.1 | 87.4 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 80.2 | 74.5 | DOOM Eternal | 58.1 | 54.0 | Warzone | 90.6 | 84.2 | Assassin's Creed | 97.6 | 90.7 | Valheim | 96.4 | 89.6 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i5-13600KF | 45% |
EPYC 7452 | 21% | To make a final resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i5-13600KF is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7452 as it consumes less power: 125W vs. 155W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, programming, machine learning, video editing or video rendering, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the CPU uses all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-13600KF |
AMD EPYC 7452 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 390 | 135 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 4188 | 5590 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 658 | 391 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 9322 | 11848 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 2352 | 626 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 26841 | 30808 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13600KF |
AMD EPYC 7452 | Single-Core | 2148 | 2155 | Multi-Core | 45756 | 45191 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13600KF |
AMD EPYC 7452 | Single-Core | 1721 | 990 | Multi-Core | 13972 | 6837 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in new games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i5-13600KF |
AMD EPYC 7452 | Announcement date | December 10, 2022 | October 01, 2019 | Type | Desktop | Server | Socket | FCLGA1700 | SP3 | Core name | Raptor Lake | Rome | Architecture | x86 | Zen 2 | Generation | 13 | 2 | Turbo Frequency | 5.1 MHz | 3.35 MHz | Frequency | 3.9 MHz | 2.35 MHz | Cores | 14 | 32 | Threads | 20 | 64 | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 56000 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 125 W | 155 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5600 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | DDR4 | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 6500 | | Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | | L1 cache | 2 MB | | L2 cache | 8 MB | | L3 cache | 24 MB | 128MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | Yes | No | Part number | | 100-000000057 100-100000057WOF
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i5-13600KF is 39% better than EPYC 7452 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7452 has 18 more core than Core i5-13600KF. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-13600KF is better: 30
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7452 is better: 7 However, it should be realized that all the number in the article above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch the testing video and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Core i5-13600KF and AMD EPYC 7452 before making a decision which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i5-13600KF Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Core i5-12500T • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Core i5-11500B • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Core i5-11500T • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i5-11600T • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Core i3-12100T • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Core i7-10700KF • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i3-12300T • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i5-11600 • Vs Core i3-12300 • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Core i5-10600KF • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Core i9-10900T • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4500 • Vs Core i3-6100 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5645 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655G • Vs Core i5-13490F • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE • Vs Core i7-13790F • Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
AMD EPYC 7452 Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs Core i7-12700E • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i7-12700HL • Vs Core i7-12800HL • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
| |
|