|
Intel Core i5-13400 vs AMD EPYC 7452 |
|
Processor comparisons 12-10-2022 If you have difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the comprehensive tests Intel Core i5-13400 vs AMD EPYC 7452 and see which is better for games or normal use for machine learning, programming, streaming, rendering, video editing. Here you can find all information from real streaming and video editing tests or several benchmarks. A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests like WPrime, SuperPi, DaVinci Resolve Studio, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, PCMark 10, Furmark, VeraCrypt, RealBench, Prime95, Blender, GeekBench 6, 5.2, 7zip, Handbrake, Gears 5, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Blender, Dolphin Emulator, MATLAB, UserBenchmark, 3DMark, PassMark, AIDA64. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Valorant
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Borderlands 3
- Death Stranding
- Valheim
- Cyberpunk 2077
- DOOM: Eternal
- Fortnite
- Halo Infinite
- Grand Theft Auto V
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Overwatch
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Apex Legends
- Fallout 76
- Last Man Standing
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7452 or Intel Core i5-13400.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i5-13400 | 59% |
EPYC 7452 | 63% | This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7452 is 6% better than Core i5-13400. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i5-13400 | 56% |
EPYC 7452 | 53% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: League of Legends (LOL), PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Ghostrunner, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Monster Hunter World, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, NBA 2K20, Battlefield V, Hitman 3, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Metro Exodus, Half-Life: Alyx, Control, Horizon Zero Dawn, DOTA 2A, Forza Horizon 4.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 100.3 | 95.0 | Valorant | 114.0 | 107.9 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 63.8 | 60.4 | Apex Legends | 107.1 | 101.4 | Call of Duty Warzone | 85.5 | 80.9 | Overwatch | 92.3 | 87.4 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 78.6 | 74.5 | DOOM Eternal | 57.0 | 54.0 | Warzone | 88.9 | 84.2 | Assassin's Creed | 95.7 | 90.7 | Valheim | 94.6 | 89.6 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i5-13400 | 91% |
EPYC 7452 | 21% | To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i5-13400 is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7452 as it consumes less power: 65W vs. 155W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video editing or video rendering, streaming, programming, machine learning, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU uses all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to reach maximum performance. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-13400 |
AMD EPYC 7452 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 276 | 135 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2844 | 5590 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 457 | 391 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 6319 | 11848 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1603 | 626 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 18171 | 30808 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13400 |
AMD EPYC 7452 | Single-Core | 1465 | 2155 | Multi-Core | 30969 | 45191 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13400 |
AMD EPYC 7452 | Single-Core | 1786 | 990 | Multi-Core | 12045 | 6837 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in the newest games. The savings are obvious! It turns out that you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i5-13400 |
AMD EPYC 7452 | Announcement date | September 23, 2022 | October 01, 2019 | Type | Desktop | Server | Socket | FCLGA1700 | SP3 | Core name | Raptor Lake | Rome | Architecture | x86 | Zen 2 | Generation | 13 | 2 | Turbo Frequency | 4.6 MHz | 3.35 MHz | Frequency | 2.5 MHz | 2.35 MHz | Cores | 10 | 32 | Threads | 16 | 64 | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 56000 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 65 W | 155 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | DDR4 | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 4800 | | Memory bandwidth | 68 GB/s | | L1 cache | 1 MB | | L2 cache | 1 MB | | L3 cache | 16 MB | 128MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | | 100-000000057 100-100000057WOF
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i5-13400 is 5% better than EPYC 7452 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7452 has 22 more core than Core i5-13400. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-13400 is better: 28
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7452 is better: 8 However, it should be understood that the summary data that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Core i5-13400 and AMD EPYC 7452 before making a decision which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i5-13400 Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Core i7-12800HL • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Core i7-12700HL • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Core i7-12700E • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5645 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE • Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
AMD EPYC 7452 Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs Core i7-12700E • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i7-12700HL • Vs Core i7-12800HL • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
| |
|