Processor comparisons 25-03-2021
If you have difficulties with the choice of a CPU, you will solve them by reading the comprehensive tests AMD EPYC 7452 vs AMD EPYC 7543P and understand which is better for games or normal use for programming, rendering, streaming, machine learning, video editing. Here is all information from real streaming and video editing tests or various benchmarks. A thorough review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like Dolphin Emulator, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), DaVinci Resolve Studio, Gears 5, 7zip, Blender, Handbrake, VeraCrypt, Furmark, PassMark, UserBenchmark, MATLAB, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, PCMark 10, Blender, AIDA64, WPrime, SuperPi, Prime95, 3DMark, RealBench, Geekbench 5.2.
Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Valheim
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Overwatch
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Apex Legends
- Fortnite
- Valorant
- Last Man Standing
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- DOOM: Eternal
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Halo Infinite
- Death Stranding
- Borderlands 3
- Fallout 76
After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7543P or AMD EPYC 7452.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| EPYC 7452 | 75% |
EPYC 7543P | 83% |
This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7543P is 9% better than EPYC 7452. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| EPYC 7452 | 56% |
EPYC 7543P | 77% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of other games in which processors were compared: Metro Exodus, NBA 2K20, Microsoft Flight Simulator, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Control, Monster Hunter World, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), League of Legends (LOL), Hitman 3, DOTA 2A, Ghostrunner, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Battlefield V, Forza Horizon 4, Horizon Zero Dawn, Half-Life: Alyx, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG).
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 98.6 | 135.9 | | Valorant | 112.0 | 154.5 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 62.7 | 86.5 | | Apex Legends | 105.3 | 145.2 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 84.0 | 115.9 | | Overwatch | 90.7 | 125.1 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 77.3 | 106.6 | | DOOM Eternal | 56.0 | 77.2 | | Warzone | 87.4 | 120.5 | | Assassin's Creed | 94.1 | 129.8 | | Valheim | 93.0 | 128.2 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| EPYC 7452 | 21% |
EPYC 7543P | 19% |
To make a final choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 7452 is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7543P as it consumes less power: 155W vs. 225W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, programming, video editing or video rendering, machine learning, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the processor turns on all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 7452 |
AMD EPYC 7543P | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 135 | 182 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 5590 | 7497 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 391 | 341 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 11848 | 15890 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 626 | 840 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 30808 | 41322 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7452 |
AMD EPYC 7543P | | Single-Core | 2155 | 1769 | | Multi-Core | 45191 | 60614 |
GeekBench 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7452 |
AMD EPYC 7543P | | Single-Core | 990 | 1306 | | Multi-Core | 6837 | 31025 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. The economy are obvious! It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD EPYC 7452 |
AMD EPYC 7543P | | Announcement date | October 01, 2019 | March 15, 2021 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | SP3 | SP3 | | Core name | Rome | Milan | | Architecture | Zen 2 | Zen 3 | | Generation | 2 | 3 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.35 MHz | 3.7 MHz | | Frequency | 2.35 MHz | 2.8 MHz | | Cores | 32 | 32 | | Threads | 64 | 64 | | Bus rate | | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 56000 millions | 68000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 155 W | 225 W | | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4 | | Max. Memory | | | | Memory Frequency | | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | | 204.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 128MB | 256MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | 100-000000057
100-100000057WOF
| 100-000000341
100-100000341WOF
|
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 7543P is 16% better than EPYC 7452 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7452 is better: 3
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7543P is better: 27
However, it should be realized that all the number in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of real owners of AMD EPYC 7452 and AMD EPYC 7543P before making a selection which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
• Cinebench r15 score
• Cinebench r20 score
• Cinebench r23 score
• GeekBench 5 score
Versus Battle of the Processors
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
• Core i9-13900K Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
• Cinebench r15 score
• Cinebench r20 score
• Cinebench r23 score
• GeekBench 5 score
Versus Battle of the Processors
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
• Core i9-13900K Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Core i9-12900K Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Core i9-12900HK Vs EPYC 7543P
• Core i9-12900H Vs EPYC 7543P
|
