|
Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X |
|
Processor comparisons 17-03-2021 If you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a decision by looking at the Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X tests and decide which is better for games or simple use for machine learning, programming, video editing, rendering, streaming. Here is all information from real streaming and video editing tests or many benchmarks. A thorough analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests such as PassMark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Blender, MATLAB, SuperPi, GeekBench 6, 5.2, 3DMark, UserBenchmark, WPrime, VeraCrypt, Prime95, Blender, Furmark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Handbrake, Dolphin Emulator, Gears 5, 7zip, PCMark 10, AIDA64, RealBench. Gaming performance of processors in: - Fallout 76
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Grand Theft Auto V
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Last Man Standing
- Overwatch
- Apex Legends
- Rainbow Six Siege
- DOOM: Eternal
- Fortnite
- Valheim
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Valorant
- Death Stranding
- Halo Infinite
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Borderlands 3
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X or Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Xeon Platinum 8260M | 60% |
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X | 69% | This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is 13% better than Xeon Platinum 8260M. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Xeon Platinum 8260M | 69% |
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X | 65% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of less popular games in which processors were compared: League of Legends (LOL), Monster Hunter World, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, DOTA 2A, Forza Horizon 4, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), NBA 2K20, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Ghostrunner, Hitman 3, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Horizon Zero Dawn, Metro Exodus, Half-Life: Alyx, Control, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Battlefield V.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 121.9 | 115.8 | Valorant | 138.5 | 131.6 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 77.6 | 73.7 | Apex Legends | 130.2 | 123.7 | Call of Duty Warzone | 103.9 | 98.7 | Overwatch | 112.2 | 106.6 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 95.6 | 90.8 | DOOM Eternal | 69.3 | 65.8 | Warzone | 108.1 | 102.7 | Assassin's Creed | 116.4 | 110.6 | Valheim | 115.0 | 109.3 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Xeon Platinum 8260M | 21% |
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X | 15% | To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Xeon Platinum 8260M is more energy efficient than the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X since it has less power consumption: 165W vs. 280W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, video rendering or video editing, machine learning, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU includes all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum performance. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 211 | 209 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 5808 | 7398 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 366 | 509 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 14048 | 17444 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1239 | 1270 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 35899 | 47102 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X | Single-Core | 2291 | 2686 | Multi-Core | 34071 | 64446 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X | Single-Core | 1071 | 1312 | Multi-Core | 33238 | 27290 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in the newest games. The savings are obvious! Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X | Announcement date | October 01, 2020 | November 25, 2019 | Type | Server | Desktop | Socket | LGA3647 | sTRX4 | Core name | Cascade Lake | Castle Peak | Architecture | x86 | Zen 2 | Generation | 2 | 3 | Turbo Frequency | 3.9 MHz | 4.5 MHz | Frequency | 2.3 MHz | 3.7 MHz | Cores | 24 | 32 | Threads | 48 | 64 | Bus rate | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 14 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 7510 millions | 22600 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 165 W | 280 W | Memory type | DDR4-2933 | DDR4 | Max. Memory | 1 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | 3200 | Memory bandwidth | | | L1 cache | | 2MB | L2 cache | | 16MB | L3 cache | 35.75 MB | 128MB | Overclocking | Yes | Yes | Supports ECC | Yes | No | Part number | | 100-000000011 100-100000011WOF
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is 37% better than Xeon Platinum 8260M in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Ryzen Threadripper 3970X has 8 more core than Xeon Platinum 8260M. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M is better: 18
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is better: 18 Although it should be understood that all the number in the text above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch the testing video and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M and AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X before making a choice which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M Processor Comparisons • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Core i9-9940X • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i9-7960X • Vs Core i9-7940X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990X • Vs Core i9-10920X • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Xeon W-2275 • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs Core i7-12700E • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i7-12700TE • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i7-12700HE • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Core i7-12700HL • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Core i7-12800HL • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D
| |
|