Processor comparisons 25-03-2021
For example you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a decision after reading the detailed tests AMD EPYC 7452 vs AMD EPYC 7663 and understand which is better for games or simple use for streaming, machine learning, rendering, video editing, programming. Here is all information from real video editing and streaming tests or several benchmarks. A thorough analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications like PassMark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Dolphin Emulator, PCMark 10, 7zip, Blender, UserBenchmark, Geekbench 5.2, RealBench, Blender, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), WPrime, Handbrake, AIDA64, Prime95, 3DMark, VeraCrypt, Furmark, Gears 5, MATLAB, SuperPi.
Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Halo Infinite
- Fallout 76
- Valorant
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Last Man Standing
- Grand Theft Auto V
- DOOM: Eternal
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Overwatch
- Fortnite
- Valheim
- Borderlands 3
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Apex Legends
- Death Stranding
After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7663 or AMD EPYC 7452.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| EPYC 7452 | 75% |
EPYC 7663 | 84% |
The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7663 is 10% better than EPYC 7452. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| EPYC 7452 | 56% |
EPYC 7663 | 90% |
For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Control, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Ghostrunner, Hitman 3, DOTA 2A, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Monster Hunter World, Horizon Zero Dawn, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Microsoft Flight Simulator, League of Legends (LOL), Forza Horizon 4, Metro Exodus, Half-Life: Alyx, NBA 2K20, Battlefield V.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 98.6 | 159.3 | | Valorant | 112.0 | 181.1 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 62.7 | 101.4 | | Apex Legends | 105.3 | 170.2 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 84.0 | 135.8 | | Overwatch | 90.7 | 146.7 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 77.3 | 124.9 | | DOOM Eternal | 56.0 | 90.5 | | Warzone | 87.4 | 141.2 | | Assassin's Creed | 94.1 | 152.1 | | Valheim | 93.0 | 150.3 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The tested computers not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| EPYC 7452 | 21% |
EPYC 7663 | 12% |
To make a finishing decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 7452 is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7663 since it has less power consumption: 155W vs. 240W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, video editing or video rendering, streaming, programming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the processor uses all threads and cores that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 7452 |
AMD EPYC 7663 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 135 | 184 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 5590 | 7606 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 391 | 347 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 11848 | 16121 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 626 | 852 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 30808 | 41920 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7452 |
AMD EPYC 7663 | | Single-Core | 2155 | 1794 | | Multi-Core | 45191 | 61492 |
GeekBench 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7452 |
AMD EPYC 7663 | | Single-Core | 990 | 874 | | Multi-Core | 6837 | 46160 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. The economy are obvious! It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD EPYC 7452 |
AMD EPYC 7663 | | Announcement date | October 01, 2019 | March 15, 2021 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | SP3 | SP3 | | Core name | Rome | Milan | | Architecture | Zen 2 | Zen 3 | | Generation | 2 | 3 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.35 MHz | 3.5 MHz | | Frequency | 2.35 MHz | 2 MHz | | Cores | 32 | 56 | | Threads | 64 | 112 | | Bus rate | | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | | 14 nm | | Transistors count | 56000 millions | 78000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 155 W | 240 W | | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4 | | Max. Memory | | | | Memory Frequency | | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | | 204.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 128MB | 256MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | 100-000000057
100-100000057WOF
| 100-000000318
100-100000318WOF
|
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 7452 is 14% better than EPYC 7663 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7663 has 24 more core than EPYC 7452. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7452 is better: 6
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7663 is better: 27
All the data that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should completely trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of real owners of AMD EPYC 7452 and AMD EPYC 7663 before deciding which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
• Cinebench r15 score
• Cinebench r20 score
• Cinebench r23 score
• GeekBench 5 score
Versus Battle of the Processors
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
• Core i9-13900K Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
• Cinebench r15 score
• Cinebench r20 score
• Cinebench r23 score
• GeekBench 5 score
Versus Battle of the Processors
• Core i9-13900K Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• EPYC 75F3 Vs EPYC 7663
• EPYC 7713 Vs EPYC 7663
• EPYC 7543P Vs EPYC 7663
• Core i9-12900K Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
• EPYC 7543 Vs EPYC 7663
• EPYC 7513 Vs EPYC 7663
|
