Processor comparisons 25-03-2021 Let's say you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a choice by looking at the AMD EPYC 7313P vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X tests and decide which is better for games or normal use for video editing, programming, rendering, machine learning, streaming. Here you can find useful information from several benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software like World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Blender, Blender, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), WPrime, PCMark 10, AIDA64, UserBenchmark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Geekbench 5.2, PassMark, MATLAB, VeraCrypt, Prime95, Furmark, 3DMark, Gears 5, SuperPi, Handbrake, Dolphin Emulator, 7zip, RealBench. Gaming performance of processors in: - Rainbow Six Siege
- Valorant
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Borderlands 3
- Death Stranding
- Fortnite
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Fallout 76
- Overwatch
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Apex Legends
- Halo Infinite
- DOOM: Eternal
- Valheim
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Last Man Standing
After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X or AMD EPYC 7313P.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
EPYC 7313P | 71% |
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X | 86% | This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is 17% better than EPYC 7313P. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.EPYC 7313P | 67% |
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X | 73% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Microsoft Flight Simulator, NBA 2K20, Half-Life: Alyx, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Forza Horizon 4, Battlefield V, Horizon Zero Dawn, Ghostrunner, Monster Hunter World, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Metro Exodus, Control, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, League of Legends (LOL), Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Hitman 3, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, DOTA 2A.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 118.0 | 130.2 | Valorant | 134.1 | 147.9 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 75.1 | 82.8 | Apex Legends | 126.0 | 139.1 | Call of Duty Warzone | 100.6 | 110.9 | Overwatch | 108.6 | 119.8 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 92.5 | 102.1 | DOOM Eternal | 67.0 | 74.0 | Warzone | 104.6 | 115.4 | Assassin's Creed | 112.6 | 124.3 | Valheim | 111.3 | 122.8 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The tested computers not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
EPYC 7313P | 23% |
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X | 15% | To make a final resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 7313P is more energy efficient than the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X as it consumes less power: 155W vs. 280W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video rendering or video editing, machine learning, streaming, programming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor includes all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to reach maximum efficiency. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 7313P |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 116 | 209 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 4742 | 7398 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 215 | 509 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 10051 | 17444 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 531 | 1270 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 26137 | 47102 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7313P |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X | Single-Core | 1195 | 2686 | Multi-Core | 38338 | 64446 |
GeekBench 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7313P |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X | Single-Core | 1107 | 1312 | Multi-Core | 19400 | 27290 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| AMD EPYC 7313P |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X | Announcement date | March 15, 2021 | November 25, 2019 | Type | Server | Desktop | Socket | SP3 | sTRX4 | Core name | Milan | Castle Peak | Architecture | Zen 3 | Zen 2 | Generation | 3 | 3 | Turbo Frequency | 3.7 MHz | 4.5 MHz | Frequency | 3 MHz | 3.7 MHz | Cores | 16 | 32 | Threads | 32 | 64 | Bus rate | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 54000 millions | 22600 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 155 W | 280 W | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4 | Max. Memory | | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 3200 | Memory bandwidth | 204.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | | 2MB | L2 cache | | 16MB | L3 cache | 128MB | 128MB | Overclocking | No | Yes | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | 100-000000339 100-100000339WOF
| 100-000000011 100-100000011WOF
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is 18% better than EPYC 7313P in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Ryzen Threadripper 3970X has 16 more core than EPYC 7313P. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7313P is better: 4
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is better: 28 However, it should be realized that the summary data that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the opinion of real owners of AMD EPYC 7313P and AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X before making a selection which processor to buy for gaming and which not. • Cinebench r15 score • Cinebench r20 score • Cinebench r23 score • GeekBench 5 score
Versus Battle of the Processors • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Core i9-12900K Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 7643
• Assassin's Creed gaming benchmark • Cinebench r15 score • Cinebench r20 score • Cinebench r23 score • GeekBench 5 score • Fortnite gaming benchmark • Roblox gaming benchmark • Valorant gaming benchmark • Cyberpunk 2077 gaming benchmark • Apex Legends gaming benchmark • Call of Duty: Warzone gaming benchmark • Overwatch gaming benchmark • Red Dead Redemption 2 gaming benchmark • DOOM Eternal gaming benchmark • GTA 5 gaming benchmark • PUBG gaming benchmark
Versus Battle of the Processors • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Core i9-13900K Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs EPYC 7702 • EPYC 7742 Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Core i9-12900K Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Core i9-12900H Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Ryzen Threadripper 3960X Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Core i9-12900KF Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • EPYC 7513 Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
|