|
AMD EPYC 7262 vs AMD EPYC 7452 |
|
Processor comparisons 19-03-2023 If you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a decision by looking at the AMD EPYC 7262 vs AMD EPYC 7452 tests and decide which is better for games or simple use for machine learning, streaming, programming, rendering, video editing. Here is useful information from several benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A thorough review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like WPrime, Furmark, Blender, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PCMark 10, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), 3DMark, 7zip, PassMark, MATLAB, VeraCrypt, Gears 5, UserBenchmark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, AIDA64, Handbrake, Prime95, SuperPi, RealBench, Blender, Dolphin Emulator. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Fortnite
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Fallout 76
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Halo Infinite
- Cyberpunk 2077
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Last Man Standing
- Overwatch
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Valorant
- Borderlands 3
- Death Stranding
- Valheim
- DOOM: Eternal
- Apex Legends
After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7452 or AMD EPYC 7262.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
EPYC 7262 | 56% |
EPYC 7452 | 63% | The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7452 is 11% better than EPYC 7262. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.EPYC 7262 | 57% |
EPYC 7452 | 53% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Half-Life: Alyx, Monster Hunter World, Battlefield V, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Hitman 3, Control, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Horizon Zero Dawn, League of Legends (LOL), DOTA 2A, Metro Exodus, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Ghostrunner, Forza Horizon 4, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, NBA 2K20.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 101.4 | 95.0 | Valorant | 115.2 | 107.9 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 64.5 | 60.4 | Apex Legends | 108.3 | 101.4 | Call of Duty Warzone | 86.4 | 80.9 | Overwatch | 93.3 | 87.4 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 79.5 | 74.5 | DOOM Eternal | 57.6 | 54.0 | Warzone | 89.9 | 84.2 | Assassin's Creed | 96.8 | 90.7 | Valheim | 95.6 | 89.6 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The tested computers not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
EPYC 7262 | 22% |
EPYC 7452 | 21% | To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 7262 is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7452 since it has less power consumption: 155W vs. 155W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, video editing or video rendering, programming, streaming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum efficiency, the processor includes all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 7262 |
AMD EPYC 7452 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 199 | 135 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 1922 | 5590 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 398 | 391 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 4212 | 11848 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1148 | 626 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 11721 | 30808 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7262 |
AMD EPYC 7452 | Single-Core | 1915 | 2155 | Multi-Core | 21190 | 45191 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7262 |
AMD EPYC 7452 | Single-Core | 1037 | 990 | Multi-Core | 13124 | 6837 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in the newest games. It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| AMD EPYC 7262 |
AMD EPYC 7452 | Announcement date | October 01, 2019 | October 01, 2019 | Type | Server | Server | Socket | SP3 | SP3 | Core name | Rome | Rome | Architecture | Zen 2 | Zen 2 | Generation | 2 | 2 | Turbo Frequency | 3.4 MHz | 3.35 MHz | Frequency | 3.2 MHz | 2.35 MHz | Cores | 8 | 32 | Threads | 16 | 64 | Bus rate | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 42000 millions | 56000 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 155 W | 155 W | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4 | Max. Memory | | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | | | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 128MB | 128MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | 100-000000041 100-100000041WOF | 100-000000057 100-100000057WOF
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 7262 is 26% better than EPYC 7452 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7452 has 24 more core than EPYC 7262. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7262 is better: 19
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7452 is better: 8 However, it should be realized that all the number that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should completely trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the reviews of real owners of AMD EPYC 7262 and AMD EPYC 7452 before making a selection which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD EPYC 7262 Processor Comparisons • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 7452 Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs Core i7-12700E • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i7-12700HL • Vs Core i7-12800HL • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
| |
|