|
AMD EPYC 9274F vs AMD EPYC 7452 |
|
Processor comparisons 11-03-2023 If there are difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the comprehensive tests AMD EPYC 9274F vs AMD EPYC 7452 and see which is better for games or simple use for programming, rendering, machine learning, streaming, video editing. Here you can find useful information from real streaming and video editing tests or different benchmarks. A thorough review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software like UserBenchmark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Prime95, SuperPi, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Handbrake, Furmark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, PassMark, RealBench, PCMark 10, MATLAB, GeekBench 6, 5.2, AIDA64, Gears 5, Blender, 7zip, VeraCrypt, Dolphin Emulator, Blender, WPrime, 3DMark. And how good the processors are in games: - Last Man Standing
- Borderlands 3
- Valorant
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Fortnite
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Apex Legends
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Halo Infinite
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Overwatch
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Fallout 76
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Valheim
- DOOM: Eternal
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Death Stranding
After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7452 or AMD EPYC 9274F.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
EPYC 9274F | 69% |
EPYC 7452 | 63% | The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 9274F is 8% better than EPYC 7452. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.EPYC 9274F | 73% |
EPYC 7452 | 53% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, League of Legends (LOL), Battlefield V, Metro Exodus, Hitman 3, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, DOTA 2A, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Half-Life: Alyx, Control, Monster Hunter World, Horizon Zero Dawn, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Ghostrunner, Forza Horizon 4, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), NBA 2K20.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 129.7 | 95.0 | Valorant | 147.4 | 107.9 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 82.5 | 60.4 | Apex Legends | 138.5 | 101.4 | Call of Duty Warzone | 110.5 | 80.9 | Overwatch | 119.4 | 87.4 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 101.7 | 74.5 | DOOM Eternal | 73.7 | 54.0 | Warzone | 114.9 | 84.2 | Assassin's Creed | 123.8 | 90.7 | Valheim | 122.3 | 89.6 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
EPYC 9274F | 21% |
EPYC 7452 | 21% |
Software benchmarksLet's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, video editing or video rendering, streaming, machine learning, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum performance, the CPU turns on all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 9274F |
AMD EPYC 7452 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 154 | 135 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 7827 | 5590 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 321 | 391 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 16627 | 11848 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 846 | 626 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 43295 | 30808 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 9274F |
AMD EPYC 7452 | Single-Core | 1946 | 2155 | Multi-Core | 63524 | 45191 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 9274F |
AMD EPYC 7452 | Single-Core | 2073 | 990 | Multi-Core | 40852 | 6837 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in new games. It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| AMD EPYC 9274F |
AMD EPYC 7452 | Announcement date | November 10, 2022 | October 01, 2019 | Type | Server | Server | Socket | SP5 | SP3 | Core name | Genoa | Rome | Architecture | Zen 4 | Zen 2 | Generation | 4 | 2 | Turbo Frequency | 4.3 MHz | 3.35 MHz | Frequency | 4.05 MHz | 2.35 MHz | Cores | 24 | 32 | Threads | 48 | 64 | Bus rate | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 5 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 64000 millions | 56000 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 320 W | 155 W | Memory type | DDR5 | DDR4 | Max. Memory | 4096 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 4800 | | Memory bandwidth | 460.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 256MB | 128MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | Yes | No | Part number | 100-000000794 100-000000794WOF | 100-000000057 100-100000057WOF
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 9274F is 41% better than EPYC 7452 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7452 has 8 more core than EPYC 9274F. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9274F is better: 30
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7452 is better: 5 However, it should be realized that all the number that you have looked at here do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of of people who bought AMD EPYC 9274F and AMD EPYC 7452 before making a decision which of the processors to buy for gaming.
AMD EPYC 9274F Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 7452 Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs Core i7-12700E • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i7-12700HL • Vs Core i7-12800HL • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
| |
|