|
AMD EPYC 9254 vs AMD EPYC 7452 |
|
Processor comparisons 11-03-2023 Let's say there are difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the comprehensive tests AMD EPYC 9254 vs AMD EPYC 7452 and understand which is better for games or normal use for video editing, machine learning, programming, streaming, rendering. Here is useful information from different benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A careful review of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like MATLAB, Furmark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Prime95, RealBench, VeraCrypt, 3DMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Handbrake, WPrime, SuperPi, Dolphin Emulator, PassMark, PCMark 10, Gears 5, 7zip, Blender, Blender, DaVinci Resolve Studio, UserBenchmark, AIDA64. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Apex Legends
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Valheim
- DOOM: Eternal
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Fallout 76
- Fortnite
- Death Stranding
- Borderlands 3
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Halo Infinite
- Valorant
- Last Man Standing
- Cyberpunk 2077
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Overwatch
After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7452 or AMD EPYC 9254.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
EPYC 9254 | 66% |
EPYC 7452 | 63% | The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 9254 is 4% better than EPYC 7452. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.EPYC 9254 | 70% |
EPYC 7452 | 53% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Monster Hunter World, NBA 2K20, Battlefield V, Control, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Ghostrunner, DOTA 2A, Hitman 3, Metro Exodus, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Microsoft Flight Simulator, Forza Horizon 4, Half-Life: Alyx, League of Legends (LOL), Horizon Zero Dawn, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO).
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 124.2 | 95.0 | Valorant | 141.2 | 107.9 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 79.1 | 60.4 | Apex Legends | 132.7 | 101.4 | Call of Duty Warzone | 105.9 | 80.9 | Overwatch | 114.3 | 87.4 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 97.4 | 74.5 | DOOM Eternal | 70.6 | 54.0 | Warzone | 110.1 | 84.2 | Assassin's Creed | 118.6 | 90.7 | Valheim | 117.2 | 89.6 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
EPYC 9254 | 29% |
EPYC 7452 | 21% | To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 9254 is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7452 since it has less power consumption: 200W vs. 155W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, video rendering or video editing, machine learning, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor uses all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to reach maximum performance. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 9254 |
AMD EPYC 7452 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 129 | 135 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 6801 | 5590 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 274 | 391 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 14453 | 11848 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 730 | 626 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 37643 | 30808 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 9254 |
AMD EPYC 7452 | Single-Core | 1687 | 2155 | Multi-Core | 55233 | 45191 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 9254 |
AMD EPYC 7452 | Single-Core | 1797 | 990 | Multi-Core | 35518 | 6837 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in the newest games. The savings are obvious! It turns out that you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD EPYC 9254 |
AMD EPYC 7452 | Announcement date | November 10, 2022 | October 01, 2019 | Type | Server | Server | Socket | SP5 | SP3 | Core name | Genoa | Rome | Architecture | Zen 4 | Zen 2 | Generation | 4 | 2 | Turbo Frequency | 4.15 MHz | 3.35 MHz | Frequency | 2.9 MHz | 2.35 MHz | Cores | 24 | 32 | Threads | 48 | 64 | Bus rate | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 5 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 64000 millions | 56000 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 200 W | 155 W | Memory type | DDR5 | DDR4 | Max. Memory | 4096 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 4800 | | Memory bandwidth | 460.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 128MB | 128MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | Yes | No | Part number | 100-000000480 100-000000480WOF | 100-000000057 100-100000057WOF
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 9254 is 18% better than EPYC 7452 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7452 has 8 more core than EPYC 9254. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9254 is better: 28
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7452 is better: 6 Although it should be realized that all the figures in the text above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the reviews of real owners of AMD EPYC 9254 and AMD EPYC 7452 before making a selection which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
AMD EPYC 9254 Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 7452 Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs Core i7-12700E • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i7-12700HL • Vs Core i7-12800HL • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
| |
|