AMD EPYC 9474F vs AMD EPYC 7313P

Processor comparisons 15-03-2023

   For example you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a choice after reading the detailed tests AMD EPYC 9474F vs AMD EPYC 7313P and see which is better for games or normal use for machine learning, programming, streaming, video editing, rendering. Here is all information from several benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A careful review of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table.
   From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like 3DMark, 7zip, Dolphin Emulator, Furmark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, VeraCrypt, Blender, RealBench, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), PCMark 10, AIDA64, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Handbrake, MATLAB, WPrime, Prime95, SuperPi, PassMark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Gears 5, Blender, UserBenchmark.
   Gaming performance of processors in:

Watch Dogs Legion
Apex Legends
Last Man Standing
DOOM: Eternal
Overwatch
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Halo Infinite
Cyberpunk 2077
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
Rainbow Six Siege
Borderlands 3
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
Valheim
Grand Theft Auto V
Red Dead Redemption 2
Death Stranding
Valorant
Fortnite
Fallout 76

After looking at the data of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7313P or AMD EPYC 9474F.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark

EPYC 9474F

77%

EPYC 7313P

61%

This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 9474F is 20% better than EPYC 7313P. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.

Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.

EPYC 9474F

85%

EPYC 7313P

62%

The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which processors were compared: Ghostrunner, DOTA 2A, NBA 2K20, Hitman 3, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Forza Horizon 4, Control, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), League of Legends (LOL), Half-Life: Alyx, Metro Exodus, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Monster Hunter World, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Horizon Zero Dawn, Battlefield V, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite	150.1	110.7
Valorant	170.6	125.8
Cyberpunk 2077	95.5	70.5
Apex Legends	160.3	118.3
Call of Duty Warzone	127.9	94.4
Overwatch	138.1	101.9
Red Dead Redemption 2	117.7	86.8
DOOM Eternal	85.3	62.9
Warzone	133.0	98.2
Assassin's Creed	143.3	105.7
Valheim	141.6	104.5

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.

Power consumption

EPYC 9474F

16%

EPYC 7313P

28%

To make a final choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 7313P is more energy efficient than the EPYC 9474F as it consumes less power: 360W vs. 155W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.

Software benchmarks

Let's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, streaming, machine learning, video editing or video rendering, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the processor includes all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused.

Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance

	AMD EPYC 9474F	AMD EPYC 7313P
Cinbench 15 Single-core	246	116
Cinbench 15 Multi-core	11139	4742
Cinbench 20 Single-core	484	215
Cinbench 20 Multi-core	23633	10051
Cinbench 23 Single-core	1229	531
Cinbench 23 Multi-core	61496	26137

Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	AMD EPYC 9474F	AMD EPYC 7313P
Single-Core	2790	1195
Multi-Core	90217	38338

GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	AMD EPYC 9474F	AMD EPYC 7313P
Single-Core	1762	1329
Multi-Core	60869	22297

Comparison of specifications

In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in the newest games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.

	AMD EPYC 9474F	AMD EPYC 7313P
Announcement date	November 10, 2022	March 15, 2021
Type	Server	Server
Socket	SP5	SP3
Core name	Genoa	Milan
Architecture	Zen 4	Zen 3
Generation	4	3
Turbo Frequency	4.1 MHz	3.7 MHz
Frequency	3.6 MHz	3 MHz
Cores	48	16
Threads	96	32
Bus rate
Bit	64	64
Lithography	5 nm	7 nm
Transistors count	64000 millions	54000 millions
Power consumption (TDP)	360 W	155 W
Memory type	DDR5	DDR4
Max. Memory	4096 Gb
Memory Frequency	4800	3200
Memory bandwidth	460.8 GB/s	204.8 GB/s
L1 cache
L2 cache
L3 cache	256MB	128MB
Overclocking	No	No
Supports ECC	Yes	No
Part number	100-000000788 100-000000788WOF	100-000000339 100-100000339WOF

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 9474F is 16% better than EPYC 7313P in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 9474F has 32 more core than EPYC 7313P. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).

Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9474F is better: 34
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7313P is better: 1
However, it should be understood that all the data in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of of people who bought AMD EPYC 9474F and AMD EPYC 7313P before making a choice which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.

AMD EPYC 9474F - all data

• Cinebench r15 score
• Cinebench r20 score
• Cinebench r23 score
• GeekBench 6, 5.2 score

• AMD EPYC 9474F specs and review.

AMD EPYC 7313P - all data

• Cinebench r15 score
• Cinebench r20 score
• Cinebench r23 score
• GeekBench 6, 5.2 score

• AMD EPYC 7313P specs and review.