AMD EPYC 7313P vs Intel Xeon W-2235

Processor comparisons 27-03-2023

   For example you have difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the full tests AMD EPYC 7313P vs Intel Xeon W-2235 and see which is better for games or normal use for rendering, machine learning, streaming, programming, video editing. Here you can find all information from real video editing and streaming tests or several benchmarks. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table.
   From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like SuperPi, Blender, PCMark 10, UserBenchmark, 7zip, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Prime95, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Gears 5, MATLAB, RealBench, DaVinci Resolve Studio, 3DMark, Dolphin Emulator, Blender, WPrime, PassMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, VeraCrypt, Handbrake, Furmark, AIDA64.
   And how good the processors are in games:

Red Dead Redemption 2
Halo Infinite
Grand Theft Auto V
Fallout 76
Death Stranding
Borderlands 3
Watch Dogs Legion
Cyberpunk 2077
Valorant
Valheim
DOOM: Eternal
Apex Legends
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
Rainbow Six Siege
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
Fortnite
Overwatch
Last Man Standing

After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Xeon W-2235 or AMD EPYC 7313P.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark

EPYC 7313P

61%

Xeon W-2235

54%

This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7313P is 11% better than Xeon W-2235. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.

Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.

EPYC 7313P

62%

Xeon W-2235

53%

The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of less popular games in which CPU comparisons were performed: League of Legends (LOL), Metro Exodus, Control, NBA 2K20, Horizon Zero Dawn, Monster Hunter World, Battlefield V, DOTA 2A, Ghostrunner, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Hitman 3, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Forza Horizon 4, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Half-Life: Alyx.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite	110.7	94.9
Valorant	125.8	107.9
Cyberpunk 2077	70.5	60.4
Apex Legends	118.3	101.4
Call of Duty Warzone	94.4	80.9
Overwatch	101.9	87.4
Red Dead Redemption 2	86.8	74.4
DOOM Eternal	62.9	53.9
Warzone	98.2	84.1
Assassin's Creed	105.7	90.6
Valheim	104.5	89.5

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.

Power consumption

EPYC 7313P

28%

Xeon W-2235

31%

To make a final choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Xeon W-2235 is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7313P as it consumes less power: 155W vs. 130W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.

Software benchmarks

For example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video editing or video rendering, programming, machine learning, streaming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU includes all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to reach maximum efficiency. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused.

Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance

	AMD EPYC 7313P	Intel Xeon W-2235
Cinbench 15 Single-core	116	206
Cinbench 15 Multi-core	4742	1514
Cinbench 20 Single-core	215	188
Cinbench 20 Multi-core	10051	5853
Cinbench 23 Single-core	531	502
Cinbench 23 Multi-core	26137	14141

Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	AMD EPYC 7313P	Intel Xeon W-2235
Single-Core	1195	2638
Multi-Core	38338	14394

GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	AMD EPYC 7313P	Intel Xeon W-2235
Single-Core	1329	1210
Multi-Core	22297	6788

Comparison of specifications

In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in the newest games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!

	AMD EPYC 7313P	Intel Xeon W-2235
Announcement date	March 15, 2021	April 01, 2020
Type	Server	Server
Socket	SP3	FCLGA2066
Core name	Milan	Cascade Lake
Architecture	Zen 3	x86
Generation	3	3
Turbo Frequency	3.7 MHz	4.6 MHz
Frequency	3 MHz	3.8 MHz
Cores	16	6
Threads	32	12
Bus rate		8 GT/s
Bit	64	64
Lithography	7 nm	14 nm
Transistors count	54000 millions	4130 millions
Power consumption (TDP)	155 W	130 W
Memory type	DDR4	DDR4 2933
Max. Memory		1 Gb
Memory Frequency	3200
Memory bandwidth	204.8 GB/s	93.85 GB/s
L1 cache
L2 cache
L3 cache	128MB	8.25 MB
Overclocking	No	No
Supports ECC	No	Yes
Part number	100-000000339 100-100000339WOF

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Xeon W-2235 is 21% better than EPYC 7313P in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7313P has 10 more core than Xeon W-2235. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).

Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7313P is better: 25
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon W-2235 is better: 10
Although it should be realized that all the data in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of real owners of AMD EPYC 7313P and Intel Xeon W-2235 before deciding which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.

AMD EPYC 7313P - all data

• Cinebench r15 score
• Cinebench r20 score
• Cinebench r23 score
• GeekBench 6, 5.2 score

• AMD EPYC 7313P specs and review.

• Intel Xeon W-2235 specs and review.