Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
MediaTek MT6592M vs Spreadtrum SC9850 benchmark which processor is better

MediaTek MT6592M vs Spreadtrum SC9850

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   So, which chip or processor is better? Comprehensive compare data of benchmarks MediaTek MT6592M vs Spreadtrum SC9850, speed testing of GPUs Mali-450 MP4 and Mali-T820.
   This performance comparison involves two processors: MT6592M is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A7) and Spreadtrum SC9850 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A7). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table.
   From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in synthetic type tests such as PCMark, 3DMark, Quadrant, Octane V2, Mozilla Kraken, Vellamo, WebXPRT 3, Neocore, Geekbench, PassMark, AnTuTu 8, GFXBench, even the gaming performance of CPUs in Mortal Kombat, Call of Duty: Mobile, PUBG, Sniper 3D, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Fortnite, Minecraft Bedrock, Real Racing 3 etc.
   After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy MT6592M or Spreadtrum SC9850 and which chip is better for gaming: CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9, Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2.

 
MediaTek MT6592M
Spreadtrum SC9850

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score
MT6592M2% Spreadtrum SC98501%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)
MT6592M22% Spreadtrum SC985030%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming
MT6592M1% Spreadtrum SC98501%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed
MT6592M Spreadtrum SC9850
Total score2806525610
CPU78587162
GPU106549729
MEM44964093
UX50464607

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
MT6592M Spreadtrum SC9850
Single-Core7468
Multi-Core343313

Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory
MT6592M Spreadtrum SC9850
Frequency1400 MHz1300 MHz
Cores84
Bit3232
Lithography28 nm28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration4x1.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A7
4x1.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A7
4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A7
Power consumption (TDP)7 W7 W
Memory typeLPDDR3LPDDR3
Max. Memory2 Gb4 Gb
Memory Frequency667266
Memory bandwidth44
Neural Processor (NPU)NoNo
L1 cache32 KB128 KB
L2 cache1 MB2 MB
L3 cache1 MB8 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)ARMv8-AARMv8-A
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MT6592M is 7% better than Spreadtrum SC9850 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that MT6592M has -4 more core than Spreadtrum SC9850. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media
GPUMali-450 MP4Mali-T820
GPU Frequency600 MHz600 MHz
GFloPS35.7710.2
# of Cores41
# of Shader Units
Display1920 x 1080 pixels1440 x 720 pixels
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark
Fortnite Mobile8.32.4
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)22.316.9
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra14.18.6
Call of Duty: Mobile14.18.3
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)18.812.5
Minecraft: Pocket Edition28.322.5
Real Racing 321.217.2
Sniper 3D18.313.8
Need for Speed No Limits22.615.5
Mortal Kombat X16.213.8
CSR Racing 216.911.2
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras
Camera resolution16 MP13 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS3030
Video Encoding resolution4K, 2K, FullHDFullHD
Codec supportH.264, H.265H.264


Networks and Navigation
Modem
Download speed150 MBit/s.300 MBit/s.
Upload speed50 MBit/s.150 MBit/s.
NavigationGPS, Galileo, Glonass, BeidouGPS, Glonass, Beidou
NFC supportNoNo
5G supportYesNo


Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6592M is better: 28
The number of parameters for which Spreadtrum SC9850 is better: 5
   You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of joint testing and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs MT6592M and Spreadtrum SC9850, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
MT6592M SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
Spreadtrum SC9850 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark


MT6592M SoC Comparisons
• Vs MediaTek MT6737
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916
• Vs MediaTek MT6592
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974
• Vs MediaTek MT8163
• Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WM
• Vs Qualcomm 205
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WW
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 MSM8920
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570
• Vs MediaTek MT6753
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917
• Vs Unisoc SC9832E
• Vs MediaTek MT6737T
• Vs MediaTek MT6739
• Vs MediaTek MT6739V
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WA
• Vs MediaTek MT6750
• Vs Atom Z3560
• Vs Unisoc SC9850K
• Vs MediaTek MT6750S
• Vs MediaTek MT6752
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580
• Vs MediaTek MT6735
• Vs MediaTek MT6737M
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E
• Vs MediaTek MT8735
• Vs MediaTek MT6737V
• Vs MediaTek MT6735P
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832
• Vs MediaTek MT8321
• Vs MediaTek MT8735M
• Vs MediaTek MT6580
• Vs MediaTek MT6580M
• Vs MediaTek MT6580A
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909
• Vs Spreadtrum SC8830
• Vs MediaTek MT8127
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A
• Vs MediaTek MT8783
• Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475
• Vs MediaTek MT6735M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928
• Vs Atom x3-C3230RK
• Vs MediaTek MT8735B
• Vs Rockchip RK3126C
• Vs MediaTek MT8382
• Vs MediaTek MT6580P
• Vs MediaTek MT6732M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228
• Vs MediaTek MT6582
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016
• Vs MediaTek MT8732
• Vs MediaTek MT8735W
• Vs MediaTek MT8765B
• Vs MediaTek MT8389
• Vs Atom Z3735F
• Vs MediaTek MT6737H
• Vs MediaTek MT8167D
• Vs MediaTek MT6732
• Vs MediaTek MT6738
• Vs MediaTek MT6753T
• Vs MediaTek MT6735T
• Vs MediaTek MT8735P
• Vs Unisoc SC7331e
• Vs MediaTek MT8167A
• Vs MediaTek MT6731


Spreadtrum SC9850 SoC Comparisons
• Vs MediaTek MT8735
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E
• Vs MediaTek MT6737
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916
• Vs MediaTek MT6592
• Vs MediaTek MT8163
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WW
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570
• Vs MediaTek MT6753
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917
• Vs Unisoc SC9832E
• Vs MediaTek MT6737T
• Vs MediaTek MT6739
• Vs MediaTek MT6739V
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WA
• Vs MediaTek MT6750
• Vs Atom Z3560
• Vs Unisoc SC9850K
• Vs MediaTek MT6750S
• Vs MediaTek MT6752
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580
• Vs Atom Z3580
• Vs MediaTek MT6750T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832
• Vs MediaTek MT8321
• Vs MediaTek MT6580
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909
• Vs MediaTek MT6737M
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WM
• Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420
• Vs MediaTek MT6580A
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215
• Vs MediaTek MT6580M
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C
• Vs MediaTek MT8735M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 MSM8920
• Vs MediaTek MT6735
• Vs MediaTek MT6735P
• Vs Qualcomm 205
• Vs MediaTek MT6737V
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974
• Vs Spreadtrum SC8830
• Vs MediaTek MT8127
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A
• Vs MediaTek MT8783
• Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475
• Vs MediaTek MT6735M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928
• Vs Atom x3-C3230RK
• Vs MediaTek MT8735B
• Vs Rockchip RK3126C
• Vs MediaTek MT8382
• Vs MediaTek MT6580P
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210
• Vs MediaTek MT6732M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228
• Vs MediaTek MT6582
• Vs MediaTek MT6572
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016
• Vs MediaTek MT8732
• Vs MediaTek MT8735W
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026
• Vs MediaTek MT8765B
• Vs Atom x3-C3130
• Vs MediaTek MT8389
• Vs Atom Z3735F
• Vs MediaTek MT6582M
• Vs MediaTek MT6737H
• Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470
• Vs MediaTek MT8167D
• Vs MediaTek MT6732
• Vs Samsung Exynos 4 Quad 4412
• Vs MediaTek MT6753T
• Vs MediaTek MT6735T
• Vs MediaTek MT8735P
• Vs Unisoc SC7331e
• Vs MediaTek MT8167A
• Vs MediaTek MT6731
• Vs Unisoc UIS8141E
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands