|
Spreadtrum SC9850 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939 |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 Well, which chip or processor is better? Comprehensive comparison data of benchmarks Spreadtrum SC9850 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939, speed examination of GPUs Mali-T820 and Adreno 405. This performance comparison includes two processors: Spreadtrum SC9850 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A7) and Snapdragon 615 MSM8939 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A53). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics of the processors, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in software tests such as Mozilla Kraken, GFXBench, Quadrant, 3DMark, Neocore, Octane V2, AnTuTu 8, Vellamo, WebXPRT 3, PCMark, Geekbench, PassMark, and how good the CPUs are in games Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Fortnite, Sniper 3D, PUBG, Call of Duty: Mobile, Minecraft Bedrock, Real Racing 3, Mortal Kombat etc. After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which processors is better to buy Spreadtrum SC9850 or Snapdragon 615 MSM8939 and which chip is better for gaming: Madout2, CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9, Need for Speed No Limits.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreSpreadtrum SC9850 | 1% |
Snapdragon 615 MSM8939 | 2% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Spreadtrum SC9850 | 30% |
Snapdragon 615 MSM8939 | 23% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingSpreadtrum SC9850 | 1% |
Snapdragon 615 MSM8939 | 1% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Spreadtrum SC9850 |
Snapdragon 615 MSM8939 | Total score | 25610 | 37558 | CPU | 7162 | 10509 | GPU | 9729 | 14272 | MEM | 4093 | 6000 | UX | 4607 | 6754 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Spreadtrum SC9850 |
Snapdragon 615 MSM8939 | Single-Core | 68 | 99 | Multi-Core | 313 | 459 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Spreadtrum SC9850 |
Snapdragon 615 MSM8939 | Frequency | 1300 MHz | 1700 MHz | Cores | 4 | 8 | Bit | 32 | 64 | Lithography | 28 nm | 28 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A7 | 8x1.7 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | Power consumption (TDP) | 7 W | 4 W | Memory type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR3 | Max. Memory | 4 Gb | 4 Gb | Memory Frequency | 266 | 800 | Memory bandwidth | 4 | 6 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB | L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | L3 cache | 8 MB | 1 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 615 MSM8939 is 23% better than Spreadtrum SC9850 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Spreadtrum SC9850 has 4 more core than Snapdragon 615 MSM8939. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-T820 | Adreno 405 | GPU Frequency | 600 MHz | 550 MHz | GFloPS | 10.2 | 59.4 | # of Cores | 1 | | # of Shader Units | | 48 | Display | 1440 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1600 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 2.4 | 10.9 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 16.9 | 29.2 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 8.6 | 18.3 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 8.3 | 15.7 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 12.5 | 24.2 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 22.5 | 37.4 | Real Racing 3 | 17.2 | 27.5 | Sniper 3D | 13.8 | 34.8 | Need for Speed No Limits | 15.5 | 22 | Mortal Kombat X | 13.8 | 23.8 | CSR Racing 2 | 11.2 | 22 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 13 MP | 21 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | FullHD | Codec support | H.264 | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and NavigationModem | | Qualcomm Snapdragon X4 LTE modem | Download speed | 300 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 150 MBit/s. | 50 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Glonass, Beidou | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Spreadtrum SC9850 is better: 6
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939 is better: 29 You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of parallel comparison and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors Spreadtrum SC9850 and Snapdragon 615 MSM8939, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
Spreadtrum SC9850 SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek MT8735 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT6737 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 • Vs MediaTek MT6592 • Vs MediaTek MT8163 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WW • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570 • Vs MediaTek MT6753 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 • Vs Unisoc SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT6737T • Vs MediaTek MT6739 • Vs MediaTek MT6739V • Vs MediaTek MT6739WA • Vs MediaTek MT6750 • Vs Atom Z3560 • Vs Unisoc SC9850K • Vs MediaTek MT6750S • Vs MediaTek MT6752 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580 • Vs Atom Z3580 • Vs MediaTek MT6750T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832 • Vs MediaTek MT8321 • Vs MediaTek MT6580 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 • Vs MediaTek MT6737M • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E • Vs MediaTek MT6739WM • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420 • Vs MediaTek MT6580A • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215 • Vs MediaTek MT6580M • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C • Vs MediaTek MT8735M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 MSM8920 • Vs MediaTek MT6735 • Vs MediaTek MT6735P • Vs Qualcomm 205 • Vs MediaTek MT6737V • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 • Vs MediaTek MT6592M • Vs Spreadtrum SC8830 • Vs MediaTek MT8127 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A • Vs MediaTek MT8783 • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 • Vs MediaTek MT6735M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 • Vs Atom x3-C3230RK • Vs MediaTek MT8735B • Vs Rockchip RK3126C • Vs MediaTek MT8382 • Vs MediaTek MT6580P • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210 • Vs MediaTek MT6732M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228 • Vs MediaTek MT6582 • Vs MediaTek MT6572 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 • Vs MediaTek MT8732 • Vs MediaTek MT8735W • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026 • Vs MediaTek MT8765B • Vs Atom x3-C3130 • Vs MediaTek MT8389 • Vs Atom Z3735F • Vs MediaTek MT6582M • Vs MediaTek MT6737H • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470 • Vs MediaTek MT8167D • Vs MediaTek MT6732 • Vs Samsung Exynos 4 Quad 4412 • Vs MediaTek MT6753T • Vs MediaTek MT6735T • Vs MediaTek MT8735P • Vs Unisoc SC7331e • Vs MediaTek MT8167A • Vs MediaTek MT6731 • Vs Unisoc UIS8141E
Snapdragon 615 MSM8939 SoC Comparisons • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 • Vs Unisoc SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT6739 • Vs MediaTek MT6739V • Vs MediaTek MT6739WA • Vs MediaTek MT6750 • Vs Atom Z3560 • Vs Unisoc SC9850K • Vs MediaTek MT6750S • Vs MediaTek MT6752 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580 • Vs Atom Z3580 • Vs MediaTek MT6750T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 • Vs Qualcomm 215 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 930 • Vs Atom Z3590 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795) • Vs MediaTek MT6595 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 650 • Vs Unisoc SC9853I • Vs MediaTek Helio A20 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 935 • Vs MediaTek Helio P10 (MT6755) • Vs MediaTek Helio A22 • Vs MediaTek Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro) • Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A • Vs MediaTek MT6753 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570 • Vs MediaTek MT6737 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832 • Vs MediaTek MT8321 • Vs MediaTek MT6580 • Vs MediaTek MT6737T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WW • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578 • Vs MediaTek MT8163 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 • Vs MediaTek MT6592 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT8735 • Vs MediaTek MT6737M • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WM • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420 • Vs MediaTek MT6580A • Vs MediaTek MT6580M • Vs MediaTek MT8735M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 MSM8920 • Vs MediaTek MT6735 • Vs MediaTek MT6735P • Vs Qualcomm 205 • Vs MediaTek MT6737V • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 • Vs MediaTek MT6592M • Vs Spreadtrum SC8830 • Vs MediaTek MT8127 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A • Vs MediaTek MT8783 • Vs MediaTek MT6732M • Vs MediaTek MT6582 • Vs MediaTek MT8765B • Vs MediaTek MT8167D • Vs MediaTek MT6732 • Vs MediaTek MT6738 • Vs MediaTek MT6753T • Vs Unisoc SC7331e • Vs MediaTek MT8167A • Vs MediaTek MT6731 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs Unisoc UIS8141E
| |
|