|
MediaTek MT6732M vs Spreadtrum SC9850 |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 So, which processor or chip is better? Comprehensive data of benchmarks and speed tests MediaTek MT6732M vs Spreadtrum SC9850, comparison of GPUs Mali-T760 MP2 and Mali-T820. This performance comparison includes two processors: MT6732M is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A53) and Spreadtrum SC9850 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A7). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in software tests like Neocore, Octane V2, PCMark, GFXBench, Quadrant, Geekbench, AnTuTu 8, PassMark, 3DMark, Mozilla Kraken, Vellamo, WebXPRT 3, even the gaming performance of chipsets in Sniper 3D, Mortal Kombat, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Real Racing 3, Call of Duty: Mobile, PUBG, Minecraft Bedrock, Fortnite etc. After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which SoCs is better to buy MT6732M or Spreadtrum SC9850 and which chip is better for gaming: Need for Speed No Limits, CSR Racing 2, Madout2, Asphalt 9.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreMT6732M | 1% |
Spreadtrum SC9850 | 1% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)MT6732M | 24% |
Spreadtrum SC9850 | 30% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingMT6732M | 1% |
Spreadtrum SC9850 | 1% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | MT6732M |
Spreadtrum SC9850 | Total score | 27277 | 25610 | CPU | 7632 | 7162 | GPU | 10363 | 9729 | MEM | 4359 | 4093 | UX | 4909 | 4607 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | MT6732M |
Spreadtrum SC9850 | Single-Core | 72 | 68 | Multi-Core | 333 | 313 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | MT6732M |
Spreadtrum SC9850 | Frequency | 1300 MHz | 1300 MHz | Cores | 8 | 4 | Bit | 64 | 32 | Lithography | 28 nm | 28 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 4x1.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | 4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A7 | Power consumption (TDP) | 7 W | 7 W | Memory type | LPDDR3 (Single Channel) | LPDDR3 | Max. Memory | 4 Gb | 4 Gb | Memory Frequency | 800 | 266 | Memory bandwidth | 4 | 4 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | 32 KB | 128 KB | L2 cache | 1 MB | 2 MB | L3 cache | 1 MB | 8 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Another difference is that MT6732M has -4 more core than Spreadtrum SC9850. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-T760 MP2 | Mali-T820 | GPU Frequency | 500 MHz | 600 MHz | GFloPS | 34 | 10.2 | # of Cores | 2 | 1 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 1920 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 720 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 7.6 | 2.4 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 21.6 | 16.9 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 13.1 | 8.6 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 13.4 | 8.3 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 17.7 | 12.5 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 27.5 | 22.5 | Real Racing 3 | 22.9 | 17.2 | Sniper 3D | 28.8 | 13.8 | Need for Speed No Limits | 21 | 15.5 | Mortal Kombat X | 17 | 13.8 | CSR Racing 2 | 15.7 | 11.2 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 16 MP | 13 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | FullHD | Codec support | H.264 | H.264 |
Networks and NavigationModem | | | Download speed | 150 MBit/s. | 300 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 50 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | GPS, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6732M is better: 29
The number of parameters for which Spreadtrum SC9850 is better: 5 You need to know that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of parallel comparison and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
MT6732M SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek MT6735 • Vs MediaTek MT6592M • Vs MediaTek MT8783 • Vs MediaTek MT6737 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 • Vs MediaTek MT6592 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 • Vs MediaTek MT8163 • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WM • Vs Qualcomm 205 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WW • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 MSM8920 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570 • Vs MediaTek MT6753 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 • Vs Unisoc SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT6737T • Vs MediaTek MT6739 • Vs MediaTek MT6739V • Vs MediaTek MT6739WA • Vs MediaTek MT6750 • Vs Atom Z3560 • Vs Unisoc SC9850K • Vs MediaTek MT6737M • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT8735 • Vs MediaTek MT6737V • Vs MediaTek MT8127 • Vs MediaTek MT6735P • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215 • Vs Spreadtrum SC8830 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A • Vs MediaTek MT8735B • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E • Vs MediaTek MT8382 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832 • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 • Vs MediaTek MT8321 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 • Vs MediaTek MT8735M • Vs MediaTek MT6580 • Vs MediaTek MT6580M • Vs MediaTek MT6580P • Vs MediaTek MT6580A • Vs MediaTek MT6735M • Vs Rockchip RK3126C • Vs Atom x3-C3230RK • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228 • Vs MediaTek MT6582 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 • Vs MediaTek MT8732 • Vs MediaTek MT8735W • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026 • Vs MediaTek MT8765B • Vs MediaTek MT8389 • Vs Atom Z3735F • Vs MediaTek MT6582M • Vs MediaTek MT6737H • Vs MediaTek MT8167D • Vs MediaTek MT6732 • Vs MediaTek MT6738 • Vs MediaTek MT6753T • Vs MediaTek MT6735T • Vs MediaTek MT8735P • Vs Unisoc SC7331e • Vs MediaTek MT8167A • Vs MediaTek MT6731
Spreadtrum SC9850 SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek MT8735 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT6737 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 • Vs MediaTek MT6592 • Vs MediaTek MT8163 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WW • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570 • Vs MediaTek MT6753 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 • Vs Unisoc SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT6737T • Vs MediaTek MT6739 • Vs MediaTek MT6739V • Vs MediaTek MT6739WA • Vs MediaTek MT6750 • Vs Atom Z3560 • Vs Unisoc SC9850K • Vs MediaTek MT6750S • Vs MediaTek MT6752 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580 • Vs Atom Z3580 • Vs MediaTek MT6750T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832 • Vs MediaTek MT8321 • Vs MediaTek MT6580 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 • Vs MediaTek MT6737M • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E • Vs MediaTek MT6739WM • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420 • Vs MediaTek MT6580A • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215 • Vs MediaTek MT6580M • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C • Vs MediaTek MT8735M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 MSM8920 • Vs MediaTek MT6735 • Vs MediaTek MT6735P • Vs Qualcomm 205 • Vs MediaTek MT6737V • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 • Vs MediaTek MT6592M • Vs Spreadtrum SC8830 • Vs MediaTek MT8127 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A • Vs MediaTek MT8783 • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 • Vs MediaTek MT6735M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 • Vs Atom x3-C3230RK • Vs MediaTek MT8735B • Vs Rockchip RK3126C • Vs MediaTek MT8382 • Vs MediaTek MT6580P • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228 • Vs MediaTek MT6582 • Vs MediaTek MT6572 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 • Vs MediaTek MT8732 • Vs MediaTek MT8735W • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026 • Vs MediaTek MT8765B • Vs Atom x3-C3130 • Vs MediaTek MT8389 • Vs Atom Z3735F • Vs MediaTek MT6582M • Vs MediaTek MT6737H • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470 • Vs MediaTek MT8167D • Vs MediaTek MT6732 • Vs Samsung Exynos 4 Quad 4412 • Vs MediaTek MT6753T • Vs MediaTek MT6735T • Vs MediaTek MT8735P • Vs Unisoc SC7331e • Vs MediaTek MT8167A • Vs MediaTek MT6731 • Vs Unisoc UIS8141E
| |
|