Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
MediaTek MT6737H vs Spreadtrum SC9850 benchmark which processor is better

MediaTek MT6737H vs Spreadtrum SC9850

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   Well, which chip or processor is better? Detailed compare data of benchmarks MediaTek MT6737H vs Spreadtrum SC9850, speed examination of GPUs Mali-T820 and Mali-T720.

   This performance comparison includes two processors: MT6737H is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A53) and Spreadtrum SC9850 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A7). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A thorough analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table.

   From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in special test applications such as Quadrant, Geekbench, WebXPRT 3, AnTuTu, PCMark, Mozilla Kraken, 3DMark, Octane V2, Vellamo, Neocore, GFXBench, PassMark, even the gaming performance of SoCs in Call of Duty: Mobile, PUBG, Sniper 3D, Mortal Kombat, Fortnite, Real Racing 3, Minecraft Bedrock, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra etc.

   After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which chip is better to buy MT6737H or Spreadtrum SC9850 and which chip is better for gaming: CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9, Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2.


 
MediaTek MT6737H
Spreadtrum SC9850

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score
MT6737H1% Spreadtrum SC98501%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)
MT6737H30% Spreadtrum SC985030%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming
MT6737H1% Spreadtrum SC98501%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed
MT6737H Spreadtrum SC9850
Total score2387025610
CPU66877162
GPU90709729
MEM38274093
UX43014607

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
MT6737H Spreadtrum SC9850
Single-Core6368
Multi-Core291313

Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory
MT6737H Spreadtrum SC9850
Frequency1250 MHz1300 MHz
Cores44
Bit6432
Lithography28 nm28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A534x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A7
Power consumption (TDP)7 W7 W
Memory typeLPDDR2, LPDDR3LPDDR3
Max. Memory3 Gb4 Gb
Memory Frequency640266
Memory bandwidth44
Neural Processor (NPU)NoNo
L1 cache32 KB128 KB
L2 cache1 MB2 MB
L3 cache1 MB8 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)ARMv8-AARMv8-A
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Spreadtrum SC9850 is 3% better than MT6737H in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media
GPUMali-T720Mali-T820
GPU Frequency450 MHz600 MHz
GFloPS7.6510.2
# of Cores11
# of Shader Units
Display1280 x 720 pixels1440 x 720 pixels
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark
Fortnite Mobile6.42.4
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)18.116.9
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra12.98.6
Call of Duty: Mobile11.58.3
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)15.112.5
Minecraft: Pocket Edition23.122.5
Real Racing 316.117.2
Sniper 3D20.613.8
Need for Speed No Limits23.215.5
Mortal Kombat X14.813.8
CSR Racing 218.111.2
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras
Camera resolution13 MP13 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS3030
Video Encoding resolutionHDFullHD
Codec support MPEG-4H.264


Networks and Navigation
Modem
Download speed150 MBit/s.300 MBit/s.
Upload speed50 MBit/s.150 MBit/s.
NavigationGPS, Glonass, Beidou
NFC supportNoNo
5G supportYesNo


Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6737H is better: 14
The number of parameters for which Spreadtrum SC9850 is better: 18
   Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of parallel comparison and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips MT6737H and Spreadtrum SC9850, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
MT6737H SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
Spreadtrum SC9850 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark


MT6737H SoC Comparisons
• Vs MediaTek MT8732
• Vs Spreadtrum SC8830
• Vs MediaTek MT6582
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215
• Vs MediaTek MT6735P
• Vs MediaTek MT8765B
• Vs MediaTek MT8127
• Vs MediaTek MT6737V
• Vs MediaTek MT8735
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E
• Vs MediaTek MT6737M
• Vs MediaTek MT6732M
• Vs MediaTek MT6735
• Vs MediaTek MT6592M
• Vs MediaTek MT8783
• Vs MediaTek MT6737
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916
• Vs MediaTek MT6592
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974
• Vs MediaTek MT8163
• Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WM
• Vs Qualcomm 205
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WW
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 MSM8920
• Vs MediaTek MT8735W
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A
• Vs MediaTek MT8735B
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E
• Vs MediaTek MT8382
• Vs MediaTek MT8389
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832
• Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475
• Vs MediaTek MT8321
• Vs Atom Z3735F
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928
• Vs MediaTek MT8735M
• Vs MediaTek MT6580
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016
• Vs MediaTek MT6580M
• Vs MediaTek MT6580P
• Vs MediaTek MT6582M
• Vs MediaTek MT6580A
• Vs MediaTek MT6735M
• Vs Rockchip RK3126C
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026
• Vs Atom x3-C3230RK
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909
• Vs Atom x3-C3130
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212
• Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470
• Vs MediaTek MT8167D
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S1
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SW
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2
• Vs MediaTek MT6732
• Vs Atom x3-C3200RK
• Vs Samsung Exynos 4 Quad 4412
• Vs MediaTek MT6753T
• Vs MediaTek MT6735T
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SE
• Vs MediaTek MT8735P
• Vs Spreadtrum SC5735
• Vs Unisoc SC7331e
• Vs MediaTek MT8167A
• Vs MediaTek MT6731


Spreadtrum SC9850 SoC Comparisons
• Vs MediaTek MT8735
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E
• Vs MediaTek MT6737
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916
• Vs MediaTek MT6592
• Vs MediaTek MT8163
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WW
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570
• Vs MediaTek MT6753
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917
• Vs Unisoc SC9832E
• Vs MediaTek MT6737T
• Vs MediaTek MT6739
• Vs MediaTek MT6739V
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WA
• Vs MediaTek MT6750
• Vs Atom Z3560
• Vs Unisoc SC9850K
• Vs MediaTek MT6750S
• Vs MediaTek MT6752
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580
• Vs Atom Z3580
• Vs MediaTek MT6750T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832
• Vs MediaTek MT8321
• Vs MediaTek MT6580
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909
• Vs MediaTek MT6737M
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WM
• Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420
• Vs MediaTek MT6580A
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215
• Vs MediaTek MT6580M
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C
• Vs MediaTek MT8735M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 MSM8920
• Vs MediaTek MT6735
• Vs MediaTek MT6735P
• Vs Qualcomm 205
• Vs MediaTek MT6737V
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974
• Vs MediaTek MT6592M
• Vs Spreadtrum SC8830
• Vs MediaTek MT8127
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A
• Vs MediaTek MT8783
• Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475
• Vs MediaTek MT6735M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928
• Vs Atom x3-C3230RK
• Vs MediaTek MT8735B
• Vs Rockchip RK3126C
• Vs MediaTek MT8382
• Vs MediaTek MT6580P
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210
• Vs MediaTek MT6732M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228
• Vs MediaTek MT6582
• Vs MediaTek MT6572
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016
• Vs MediaTek MT8732
• Vs MediaTek MT8735W
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026
• Vs MediaTek MT8765B
• Vs Atom x3-C3130
• Vs MediaTek MT8389
• Vs Atom Z3735F
• Vs MediaTek MT6582M
• Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470
• Vs MediaTek MT8167D
• Vs MediaTek MT6732
• Vs Samsung Exynos 4 Quad 4412
• Vs MediaTek MT6753T
• Vs MediaTek MT6735T
• Vs MediaTek MT8735P
• Vs Unisoc SC7331e
• Vs MediaTek MT8167A
• Vs MediaTek MT6731
• Vs Unisoc UIS8141E
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands