Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
Intel Xeon Silver 4416+ vs AMD EPYC 9654P gaming benchmark

Intel Xeon Silver 4416+ vs AMD EPYC 9654P

Processor comparisons   15-05-2023
   If you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a choice by looking at the Intel Xeon Silver 4416+ vs AMD EPYC 9654P tests and decide which is better for games or normal use for programming, machine learning, rendering, video editing, streaming. Here is all information from real streaming and video editing tests or various benchmarks. A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table.
   From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software such as PCMark 10, Furmark, Gears 5, Blender, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), 7zip, WPrime, MATLAB, Dolphin Emulator, GeekBench 6, 5.2, 3DMark, Blender, Handbrake, Prime95, PassMark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, SuperPi, AIDA64, UserBenchmark, RealBench, VeraCrypt.
   Gaming performance of CPUs in:
  • Red Dead Redemption 2
  • Valorant
  • Cyberpunk 2077
  • Watch Dogs Legion
  • Fortnite
  • Rainbow Six Siege
  • Last Man Standing
  • World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
  • Overwatch
  • Borderlands 3
  • Death Stranding
  • Valheim
  • Grand Theft Auto V
  • Apex Legends
  • Assassin's Creed Valhalla
  • Halo Infinite
  • Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
  • Fallout 76
  • DOOM: Eternal

   After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 9654P or Intel Xeon Silver 4416+.


 
Intel Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 9654P

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
Xeon Silver 4416+64% EPYC 9654P98%
This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 9654P is 34% better than Xeon Silver 4416+. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.

Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.
Xeon Silver 4416+67% EPYC 9654P98%
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a little game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Monster Hunter World, NBA 2K20, Battlefield V, Horizon Zero Dawn, Ghostrunner, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Metro Exodus, League of Legends (LOL), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Forza Horizon 4, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Control, DOTA 2A, Hitman 3, Half-Life: Alyx.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite118.0173.9
Valorant134.1197.6
Cyberpunk 207775.1110.7
Apex Legends126.1185.8
Call of Duty Warzone100.6148.2
Overwatch108.6160.1
Red Dead Redemption 292.6136.4
DOOM Eternal67.198.8
Warzone104.6154.1
Assassin's Creed112.7166.0
Valheim111.3164.0
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.


Power consumption
Xeon Silver 4416+24% EPYC 9654P14%
To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Xeon Silver 4416+ is more energy efficient than the EPYC 9654P since it has less power consumption: 165W vs. 360W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.

Software benchmarks

If you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, video rendering or video editing, programming, machine learning, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor turns on all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to reach maximum efficiency. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance
Intel Xeon Silver 4416+ AMD EPYC 9654P
Cinbench 15 Single-core1057469
Cinbench 15 Multi-core341919565
Cinbench 20 Single-core2350887
Cinbench 20 Multi-core844241479
Cinbench 23 Single-core16342185
Cinbench 23 Multi-core48070107871

Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
Intel Xeon Silver 4416+ AMD EPYC 9654P
Single-Core149244612
Multi-Core48932158238

GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
Intel Xeon Silver 4416+ AMD EPYC 9654P
Single-Core12251586
Multi-Core2944684216

Comparison of specifications

In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.

Intel Xeon Silver 4416+ AMD EPYC 9654P
Announcement dateMarch 28, 2023November 10, 2022
TypeServerServer
SocketFCLGA4677SP5
Core nameSapphire RapidsGenoa
Architecturex86Zen 4
Generation44
Turbo Frequency3.9 MHz3.7 MHz
Frequency2 MHz2.4 MHz
Cores2096
Threads40192
Bus rate16 GT/s
Bit6464
Lithography7 nm5 nm
Transistors count36000 millions116000 millions
Power consumption (TDP)165 W360 W
Memory typeUp to DDR5 4000 MT/s 1DPC and 2DPCDDR5
Max. Memory4 Gb
Memory Frequency4800
Memory bandwidth460.8
L1 cache
L2 cache
L3 cache37.5 MB384MB
OverclockingNoNo
Supports ECCYesYes
Part number100-000000803
100-100000803WOF
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 9654P is 16% better than Xeon Silver 4416+ in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 9654P has 76 more core than Xeon Silver 4416+. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).

Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon Silver 4416+ is better: 8
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9654P is better: 26
   Although it should be realized that all the figures that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Xeon Silver 4416+ and AMD EPYC 9654P before making a choice which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Xeon Silver 4416+ - all data

•  Cinebench r15 score
•  Cinebench r20 score
•  Cinebench r23 score
•  GeekBench 6, 5.2 score
AMD EPYC 9654P - all data

•  Cinebench r15 score
•  Cinebench r20 score
•  Cinebench r23 score
•  GeekBench 6, 5.2 score


Intel Xeon Silver 4416+ Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 74F3


AMD EPYC 9654P Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands