 |
Intel Xeon Silver 4416+ vs AMD EPYC 9554 |
|
Processor comparisons 15-05-2023
For example there are difficulties with the choice of a CPU, you will solve them by reading the detailed tests Intel Xeon Silver 4416+ vs AMD EPYC 9554 and understand which is better for games or simple use for video editing, streaming, machine learning, rendering, programming. Here you can find useful information from various benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is presented in the form of the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like GeekBench 6, 5.2, Dolphin Emulator, PassMark, Furmark, MATLAB, SuperPi, 7zip, Prime95, 3DMark, Blender, UserBenchmark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, VeraCrypt, PCMark 10, Gears 5, AIDA64, Blender, RealBench, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), WPrime, Handbrake, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark.
Gaming performance of processors in: - World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- DOOM: Eternal
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Halo Infinite
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Fortnite
- Valheim
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Last Man Standing
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Apex Legends
- Borderlands 3
- Valorant
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Fallout 76
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Death Stranding
- Overwatch
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 9554 or Intel Xeon Silver 4416+.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Xeon Silver 4416+ | 64% |
EPYC 9554 | 87% |
This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 9554 is 26% better than Xeon Silver 4416+. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Xeon Silver 4416+ | 67% |
EPYC 9554 | 88% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Battlefield V, Ghostrunner, Half-Life: Alyx, NBA 2K20, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Microsoft Flight Simulator, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Control, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, DOTA 2A, Monster Hunter World, Metro Exodus, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Hitman 3, Forza Horizon 4, Horizon Zero Dawn, League of Legends (LOL).
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 118.0 | 155.8 | | Valorant | 134.1 | 177.1 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 75.1 | 99.2 | | Apex Legends | 126.1 | 166.4 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 100.6 | 132.8 | | Overwatch | 108.6 | 143.4 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 92.6 | 122.2 | | DOOM Eternal | 67.1 | 88.5 | | Warzone | 104.6 | 138.1 | | Assassin's Creed | 112.7 | 148.7 | | Valheim | 111.3 | 147.0 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Xeon Silver 4416+ | 24% |
EPYC 9554 | 14% |
To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Xeon Silver 4416+ is more energy efficient than the EPYC 9554 as it consumes less power: 165W vs. 360W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, programming, video editing or video rendering, machine learning, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the CPU uses all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Xeon Silver 4416+ |
AMD EPYC 9554 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 1057 | 380 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 3419 | 15365 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 2350 | 708 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 8442 | 32559 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1634 | 1726 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 48070 | 84655 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Silver 4416+ |
AMD EPYC 9554 | | Single-Core | 14924 | 3630 | | Multi-Core | 48932 | 124178 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Silver 4416+ |
AMD EPYC 9554 | | Single-Core | 1225 | 1560 | | Multi-Core | 29446 | 66486 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in new games. The savings are obvious! It turns out that you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Xeon Silver 4416+ |
AMD EPYC 9554 | | Announcement date | March 28, 2023 | November 10, 2022 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | FCLGA4677 | SP5 | | Core name | Sapphire Rapids | Genoa | | Architecture | x86 | Zen 4 | | Generation | 4 | 4 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.9 MHz | 3.75 MHz | | Frequency | 2 MHz | 3.1 MHz | | Cores | 20 | 64 | | Threads | 40 | 128 | | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 5 nm | | Transistors count | 36000 millions | 108000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 165 W | 360 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4000 MT/s 1DPC and 2DPC | DDR5 | | Max. Memory | 4 Gb | | | Memory Frequency | | 4800 | | Memory bandwidth | | 460.8 | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 37.5 MB | 256MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | | Part number | | 100-000000790
100-100000790WOF |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 9554 is 35% better than Xeon Silver 4416+ in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 9554 has 44 more core than Xeon Silver 4416+. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon Silver 4416+ is better: 9
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9554 is better: 25
However, it should be understood that the summary data in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Xeon Silver 4416+ and AMD EPYC 9554 before making a choice which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Xeon Silver 4416+ Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 74F3
AMD EPYC 9554 Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
|
|
|
