|
Intel Xeon Silver 4416+ vs AMD EPYC 7313 |
|
Processor comparisons 15-05-2023 Let's say you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a choice after reading the detailed tests Intel Xeon Silver 4416+ vs AMD EPYC 7313 and decide which is better for games or simple use for programming, streaming, video editing, rendering, machine learning. Here is all information from real video editing and streaming tests or various benchmarks. A thorough review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software like Blender, 3DMark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Handbrake, Blender, Furmark, Gears 5, SuperPi, WPrime, VeraCrypt, UserBenchmark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, PassMark, Prime95, AIDA64, RealBench, Dolphin Emulator, PCMark 10, MATLAB, 7zip. And how good the processors are in games: - Watch Dogs Legion
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Fallout 76
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Borderlands 3
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Overwatch
- Apex Legends
- Fortnite
- Halo Infinite
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Death Stranding
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Valheim
- Valorant
- Last Man Standing
- DOOM: Eternal
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7313 or Intel Xeon Silver 4416+.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Xeon Silver 4416+ | 64% |
EPYC 7313 | 62% | This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Xeon Silver 4416+ is 3% better than EPYC 7313. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Xeon Silver 4416+ | 67% |
EPYC 7313 | 68% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Forza Horizon 4, DOTA 2A, Metro Exodus, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Half-Life: Alyx, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Hitman 3, Control, Microsoft Flight Simulator, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Ghostrunner, NBA 2K20, Horizon Zero Dawn, League of Legends (LOL), Monster Hunter World, Battlefield V.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 118.0 | 120.0 | Valorant | 134.1 | 136.4 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 75.1 | 76.4 | Apex Legends | 126.1 | 128.2 | Call of Duty Warzone | 100.6 | 102.3 | Overwatch | 108.6 | 110.5 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 92.6 | 94.1 | DOOM Eternal | 67.1 | 68.2 | Warzone | 104.6 | 106.4 | Assassin's Creed | 112.7 | 114.6 | Valheim | 111.3 | 113.2 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The tested computers not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Xeon Silver 4416+ | 24% |
EPYC 7313 | 30% | To make a final choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 7313 is more energy efficient than the Xeon Silver 4416+ as it consumes less power: 165W vs. 155W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, machine learning, video editing or video rendering, programming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU includes all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum efficiency. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Xeon Silver 4416+ |
AMD EPYC 7313 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 1057 | 124 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 3419 | 5029 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 2350 | 229 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 8442 | 10661 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1634 | 564 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 48070 | 27719 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Silver 4416+ |
AMD EPYC 7313 | Single-Core | 14924 | 1268 | Multi-Core | 48932 | 40658 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Silver 4416+ |
AMD EPYC 7313 | Single-Core | 1225 | 1399 | Multi-Core | 29446 | 31411 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in new games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Xeon Silver 4416+ |
AMD EPYC 7313 | Announcement date | March 28, 2023 | March 15, 2021 | Type | Server | Server | Socket | FCLGA4677 | SP3 | Core name | Sapphire Rapids | Milan | Architecture | x86 | Zen 3 | Generation | 4 | 3 | Turbo Frequency | 3.9 MHz | 3.7 MHz | Frequency | 2 MHz | 3 MHz | Cores | 20 | 16 | Threads | 40 | 32 | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 36000 millions | 54000 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 165 W | 155 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4000 MT/s 1DPC and 2DPC | DDR4 | Max. Memory | 4 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | 3200 | Memory bandwidth | | 204.8 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 37.5 MB | 128MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | Yes | No | Part number | | 100-000000329 100-100000329WOF
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 7313 is 33% better than Xeon Silver 4416+ in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Xeon Silver 4416+ has 4 more core than EPYC 7313. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon Silver 4416+ is better: 15
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7313 is better: 20 However, it should be understood that the summary data in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of of people who bought Intel Xeon Silver 4416+ and AMD EPYC 7313 before making a decision which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Intel Xeon Silver 4416+ Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 74F3
AMD EPYC 7313 Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Xeon W-2275 • Vs Core i9-9940X • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs Core i7-12700E • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i7-12700TE • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i7-12700HE • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Core i7-12700HL • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Core i7-12800HL • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
| |
|