 |
Intel Xeon Silver 4416+ vs AMD EPYC 7232P |
|
Processor comparisons 15-05-2023
For example you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a decision after reading the detailed tests Intel Xeon Silver 4416+ vs AMD EPYC 7232P and decide which is better for games or normal use for machine learning, streaming, video editing, rendering, programming. Here you can find useful information from real video editing and streaming tests or different benchmarks. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications such as World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Prime95, RealBench, Blender, VeraCrypt, MATLAB, PassMark, Handbrake, AIDA64, Dolphin Emulator, Gears 5, GeekBench 6, 5.2, UserBenchmark, 3DMark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Furmark, WPrime, PCMark 10, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), SuperPi, 7zip, Blender.
And how good the processors are in games: - Overwatch
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Fallout 76
- Borderlands 3
- Halo Infinite
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Last Man Standing
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Valheim
- Death Stranding
- Fortnite
- Valorant
- Cyberpunk 2077
- DOOM: Eternal
- Apex Legends
After looking at the data of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7232P or Intel Xeon Silver 4416+.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Xeon Silver 4416+ | 64% |
EPYC 7232P | 55% |
The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Xeon Silver 4416+ is 14% better than EPYC 7232P. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Xeon Silver 4416+ | 67% |
EPYC 7232P | 55% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of other games in which processors were compared: Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, League of Legends (LOL), Battlefield V, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Metro Exodus, Ghostrunner, Forza Horizon 4, Horizon Zero Dawn, Microsoft Flight Simulator, NBA 2K20, Control, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), DOTA 2A, Half-Life: Alyx, Monster Hunter World, Hitman 3, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG).
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 118.0 | 96.8 | | Valorant | 134.1 | 110.0 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 75.1 | 61.6 | | Apex Legends | 126.1 | 103.4 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 100.6 | 82.5 | | Overwatch | 108.6 | 89.1 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 92.6 | 75.9 | | DOOM Eternal | 67.1 | 55.0 | | Warzone | 104.6 | 85.8 | | Assassin's Creed | 112.7 | 92.4 | | Valheim | 111.3 | 91.3 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Xeon Silver 4416+ | 24% |
EPYC 7232P | 26% |
To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 7232P is more energy efficient than the Xeon Silver 4416+ as it consumes less power: 165W vs. 120W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video rendering or video editing, machine learning, streaming, programming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the CPU includes all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Xeon Silver 4416+ |
AMD EPYC 7232P | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 1057 | 211 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 3419 | 1570 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 2350 | 372 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 8442 | 3480 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1634 | 1255 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 48070 | 9326 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Silver 4416+ |
AMD EPYC 7232P | | Single-Core | 14924 | 1367 | | Multi-Core | 48932 | 16608 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Silver 4416+ |
AMD EPYC 7232P | | Single-Core | 1225 | 965 | | Multi-Core | 29446 | 8637 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. The economy are obvious! It turns out that you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Xeon Silver 4416+ |
AMD EPYC 7232P | | Announcement date | March 28, 2023 | April 01, 2020 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | FCLGA4677 | SP3 | | Core name | Sapphire Rapids | Rome | | Architecture | x86 | Zen 2 | | Generation | 4 | 2 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.9 MHz | 3.2 MHz | | Frequency | 2 MHz | 3.1 MHz | | Cores | 20 | 8 | | Threads | 40 | 16 | | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 36000 millions | 42000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 165 W | 120 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4000 MT/s 1DPC and 2DPC | DDR4 | | Max. Memory | 4 Gb | | | Memory Frequency | | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | | 85 GByte/s | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 37.5 MB | 32MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | | Part number | | 100-000000081
100-100000081WOF |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 7232P is 35% better than Xeon Silver 4416+ in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Xeon Silver 4416+ has 12 more core than EPYC 7232P. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon Silver 4416+ is better: 29
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7232P is better: 5
Although it should be understood that all the figures in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Xeon Silver 4416+ and AMD EPYC 7232P before making a decision which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Xeon Silver 4416+ Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 74F3
AMD EPYC 7232P Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
|
|
|
